Started By
Message

re: Feinstein concedes Credible Ford May not be telling truth

Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:23 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123910 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Did you think Feinstein was there!?!
She sat on this for two months. It has nothing to do with her "believing" Ford's story, or "believing" any aspect of it was true. This is all about timeline manipulation, and politics. Period!
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

What can happen for Kavanaugh to clear himself to you?


Clear himself? As far as I'm concerned he never assaulted that woman. That doesn't mean claims don't need to be investigated.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

You should just stop. You are bleeding all over the board like a loon


The bleeding is on ebbnflow levels. He is embarrassing himself on multiple threads
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to
quote:


Special report just played the clip of Feinstein saying “I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know." Quote is accurate.

Have we discussed this yet?

And may I reiterrate that Feinstein should be expelled from the Senate and also tried and convicted for lying to the FBI.

WHAT THE ACTUAL frick?


I have the evidence that in 1976 when Feinstein was a member of the SF Board of Supervisors, she voted for legislation that she knew illegally amended a ballot measure passed by the SF voters. It is SF Ordinance #293-76.

It proves Feinstein really doesn't give a shite about what the voters want.

Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
7950 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to
Where is Ellison’s accuser? Why isn’t she on every newscast, why isn’t she being invited to speak before Congress? She has far more damaging physical evidence than this woman making claims from 36 years ago. Who by the way, has zero physical evidence and zero witnesses.

Do you not see a bias?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Clear himself? As far as I'm concerned he never assaulted that woman. That doesn't mean claims don't need to be investigated


How does one investigate a thirty-five-year-old claim with no physical evidence?
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15416 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to
Actually NC Tigah, it is quite possible that DiFi sat on this in part because she DID NOT believe this “credible” accuser and knew she would look like an absolute dumbass for vouching for her.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

How does one investigate a thirty-five-year-old claim with no physical evidence?


We'll find out, wont we?
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm to
quote:




That is not the same as thinking it's not credible. Do you understand the distinction?



...please name me 3 sources you believe to be credible without knowing if the content of those sources is truthful.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73639 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

The bleeding is on ebbnflow levels. He is embarrassing himself on multiple threads


Its amazing to witness the dedication

Must be ebbandflows alter
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:27 pm to
quote:


We'll find out, wont we


No actually we won't because it's impossible. And you know it's impossible also. That's why you ducked the question
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

As far as I'm concerned he never assaulted that woman. That doesn't mean claims don't need to be investigated.




Then let the local police handle it as any other sexual assault allegation would be.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

“I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."


Far more honest than some on this board
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6495 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to
quote:



Exactly. Of course there is a possibility it's not credible. Did she ever say the opposite?





... thank you for agreeing with me. her saying the opposite would mean that it IS credible.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

Actually NC Tigah, it is quite possible that DiFi sat on this in part because she DID NOT believe this “credible” accuser and knew she would look like an absolute dumbass for vouching for her.


No way.

You don't know Feinstein like I do.
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

please name me 3 sources you believe to be credible without knowing if the content of those sources is truthful.


any random person who comes up to me on the street and tells me they were raped.

Do I believe them? Sure. Do I know they were raped? Nope.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72100 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

No actually we won't because it's impossible. And you know it's impossible also. That's why you ducked the question
Exactly.

It is actually impossible.

These morons are basing this off of something that cannot be proven.

It is insanity.

That is the standard they apparently want, which is insanely dangerous.
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

No actually we won't because it's impossible.


Of course it's not. That's why they're having a hearing.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 pm to
quote:


any random person who comes up to me on the street and tells me they were raped.

Do I believe them? Sure. Do I know they were raped? Nope

You believe any random person who tells you they were raped? Are you stupid?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111524 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

Actually NC Tigah, it is quite possible that DiFi sat on this in part because she DID NOT believe this “credible” accuser and knew she would look like an absolute dumbass for vouching for her.


I suspect that it’s worse. They knew she was lying. She gave more details to them initially. Maybe a house that didn’t match her story. Maybe a time that didn’t match Kavanaugh’s movements. And they knew her story would fall apart. So they told her to lose the details and to wait by the phone. There’s no chance she’ll be believed. The only chance is delaying the vote.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram