- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Feinstein concedes Credible Ford May not be telling truth
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:23 pm to LSUconvert
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:23 pm to LSUconvert
quote:She sat on this for two months. It has nothing to do with her "believing" Ford's story, or "believing" any aspect of it was true. This is all about timeline manipulation, and politics. Period!
Did you think Feinstein was there!?!
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
What can happen for Kavanaugh to clear himself to you?
Clear himself? As far as I'm concerned he never assaulted that woman. That doesn't mean claims don't need to be investigated.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
You should just stop. You are bleeding all over the board like a loon
The bleeding is on ebbnflow levels. He is embarrassing himself on multiple threads
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Special report just played the clip of Feinstein saying “I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know." Quote is accurate.
Have we discussed this yet?
And may I reiterrate that Feinstein should be expelled from the Senate and also tried and convicted for lying to the FBI.
WHAT THE ACTUAL frick?
I have the evidence that in 1976 when Feinstein was a member of the SF Board of Supervisors, she voted for legislation that she knew illegally amended a ballot measure passed by the SF voters. It is SF Ordinance #293-76.
It proves Feinstein really doesn't give a shite about what the voters want.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to Clark14
Where is Ellison’s accuser? Why isn’t she on every newscast, why isn’t she being invited to speak before Congress? She has far more damaging physical evidence than this woman making claims from 36 years ago. Who by the way, has zero physical evidence and zero witnesses.
Do you not see a bias?
Do you not see a bias?
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Clear himself? As far as I'm concerned he never assaulted that woman. That doesn't mean claims don't need to be investigated
How does one investigate a thirty-five-year-old claim with no physical evidence?
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:25 pm to NC_Tigah
Actually NC Tigah, it is quite possible that DiFi sat on this in part because she DID NOT believe this “credible” accuser and knew she would look like an absolute dumbass for vouching for her.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
How does one investigate a thirty-five-year-old claim with no physical evidence?
We'll find out, wont we?
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
That is not the same as thinking it's not credible. Do you understand the distinction?
...please name me 3 sources you believe to be credible without knowing if the content of those sources is truthful.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:26 pm to Wild Thang
quote:
The bleeding is on ebbnflow levels. He is embarrassing himself on multiple threads
Its amazing to witness the dedication
Must be ebbandflows alter
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:27 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
We'll find out, wont we
No actually we won't because it's impossible. And you know it's impossible also. That's why you ducked the question
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:27 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
As far as I'm concerned he never assaulted that woman. That doesn't mean claims don't need to be investigated.
Then let the local police handle it as any other sexual assault allegation would be.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to Wednesday
quote:
“I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."
Far more honest than some on this board
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Exactly. Of course there is a possibility it's not credible. Did she ever say the opposite?
... thank you for agreeing with me. her saying the opposite would mean that it IS credible.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Actually NC Tigah, it is quite possible that DiFi sat on this in part because she DID NOT believe this “credible” accuser and knew she would look like an absolute dumbass for vouching for her.
No way.
You don't know Feinstein like I do.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to AMS
quote:
please name me 3 sources you believe to be credible without knowing if the content of those sources is truthful.
any random person who comes up to me on the street and tells me they were raped.
Do I believe them? Sure. Do I know they were raped? Nope.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:28 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Exactly.
No actually we won't because it's impossible. And you know it's impossible also. That's why you ducked the question
It is actually impossible.
These morons are basing this off of something that cannot be proven.
It is insanity.
That is the standard they apparently want, which is insanely dangerous.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
No actually we won't because it's impossible.
Of course it's not. That's why they're having a hearing.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
any random person who comes up to me on the street and tells me they were raped.
Do I believe them? Sure. Do I know they were raped? Nope
You believe any random person who tells you they were raped? Are you stupid?
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Actually NC Tigah, it is quite possible that DiFi sat on this in part because she DID NOT believe this “credible” accuser and knew she would look like an absolute dumbass for vouching for her.
I suspect that it’s worse. They knew she was lying. She gave more details to them initially. Maybe a house that didn’t match her story. Maybe a time that didn’t match Kavanaugh’s movements. And they knew her story would fall apart. So they told her to lose the details and to wait by the phone. There’s no chance she’ll be believed. The only chance is delaying the vote.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News