- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:13 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
If I could, I'd Skype myself doing it and charge you.
Come out come out wherever you are!
Come out come out wherever you are!
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:13 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
and there it is...
People may hate slippery slope arguments, but given that government has a tendency to grow rather than retract it's probably not entirely misplaced.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:14 pm to BamaFan89
Just something for their campaign commercials.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:14 pm to Vegas Bengal
Apparently you missed this:
Unless you're too ignorant to follow the discussion.
quote:
Headline was taken from another website where I initially read about the bill.
Unless you're too ignorant to follow the discussion.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:15 pm to NC_Tigah
And nc is the only honest con in the thread. As usual.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:15 pm to BamaFan89
i don't really reject the concept of the first 2, as long as there is legitimate due process and seizure does not occur prior to granting the person due process, unless imminent danger is presented.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:15 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:+1
Feinstein/Boxer Introduce Federal Bill to Confiscate Guns in cases involving Court assessed MENTAL INSTABILITY.
I have no problem with this as long as criterion assessing mental instability are reasonable and clear, and ability to reasonably petition court for return of guns is in place.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
as long as there is legitimate due process and seizure does not occur prior to granting the person due process, unless imminent danger is presented.
Again, I totally agree, but that is way too reasonable when talking about 'ER GUNS!!!
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
My concern would be whether such processes could be done ex parte.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:17 pm to boosiebadazz
well this law is probably redundant, as i bet california has a restraining order law that is part of the national compact (and following federal law) which grants a vehicle to prevent gun possession if a legitimate threat exists
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:17 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
Do you guys think law enforcement should be able to check for cc on the computer before addressing you during a traffic stop?
In Louisiana if you have a CC and are armed, you are required to immediately notify law enforcement of such when coming into contact with them
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i don't really reject the concept of the first 2, as long as there is legitimate due process and seizure does not occur prior to granting the person due process, unless imminent danger is presented.
I'm in the same boat.
I am a bit concerned about how much leeway and authority this would, if ever passed, give the government, though.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:18 pm to BamaFan89
quote:Funny, when I google it all I come up with is this thread on TigerDroppings.
Headline was taken from another website where I initially read about the bill.
... and you still haven't made an effort to fix the title.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:18 pm to Chappy
Not every State requires you to notify law enforcement.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i don't really reject the concept of the first 2, as long as there is legitimate due process and seizure does not occur prior to granting the person due process, unless imminent danger is presented.
Not to mention it's taking more of an approach towards mental instability rather than casting a wide net measures that government seems to love so much.
My only real concern is what constitutes mental instability. If a family provides a prescription for Prozac, for example, does that demonstrate instability?
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Well if someone comes for my guns unfairly, I might well have a seizure. I don't see where that should be held against me though.
and seizure does not occur prior to granting the person due process, unless imminent danger is presented.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:19 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
And nc is the only honest con in the thread. As usual.
I'm 100% honest on the poli board and too often wrong VB.
OK
98.2 % honest
This post was edited on 6/6/14 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:20 pm to NC_Tigah
I hope you guys realize this type of law would become a regular tactic in divorce proceedings.
Posted on 6/6/14 at 2:20 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Funny, when I google it all I come up with is this thread on TigerDroppings.
Feel better now?
quote:
... and you still haven't made an effort to fix the title.
Why should I?
Does this bill not propose the confiscation of weapons?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News