- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:58 am to BCreed1
Public Opinion?
The voters have spoken.
The voters have spoken.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:58 am to BCreed1
quote:
they argue, makes it seem like they did shoddy work and are biased against Trump
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:14 am to scrooster
quote:
It would take 16 libtard members of the house flipping in order to impeach a judge and that's not likely to happen
You mean Senate (to convict/remove)?
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:51 am to BCreed1
This is fricking unbelievable
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:52 am to udtiger
quote:
This is a HUGE violation of judicial canons.
I am gobsmacked.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:04 pm to Wally Sparks
Get them exposed in a hearing they can be removed for bad behavior also. You can bet somebody is looking at this
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:05 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
You mean Senate (to convict/remove)?
Yes, my bad .... good catch. I had The House on the brain because of some hearings I was watching at the time.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 12:34 pm to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
This comes down to two questions here:
1. Do you think that 12 "anonymous" judges give the impression of bias by providing commentary to this article? If yes, this provides a clear bias and calls into question their judgements.
2. Should judges be allowed to report their opinions, or are they bound to the law? I don't care what their political affiliations are, as long as they provide their rulings based upon a strict interpretation of the law.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 2:49 pm to BCreed1
quote:
noting that the terse decisions leave lower court judges with little guidance for how to proceed
The lower courts don't need "guidance" - they just need to read and apply the law.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:05 pm to Riverside
Same place SFP did... 
Posted on 9/4/25 at 10:07 pm to BCreed1
Federal judges have way too much power… no term limits, and I’m sick of that joke that they think they are Gods.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:39 pm to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
You are one vile POS.
Posted on 9/4/25 at 11:41 pm to BCreed1
This sounds an awful lot like a threat to democracy.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 2:32 am to udtiger
If Roberts doesn't do something to stop this nonsense his legacy is going to be that the United States Judicial System crashed and burned under his watch. He has to know this, and that whispers of this have started. USSC and US Justice has functioned relatively effective for 236 years. Now it's on him to keep it so. Seems to me if he would yank knots into a few tails the activism would taper off considerably. Up to him.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 3:07 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
Federal judges are elected for life
Federal judges are not elected at all.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 3:09 am to Decatur
quote:
Which canon does this violate?
the one about not being political.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 7:20 am to blueridgeTiger
quote:
The lower courts don't need "guidance" - they just need to read and apply the law.
THIS..Men are not perfect...but if you cant place your personal feelings aside and be fair when you put that black robe on you do not belong on the bench, and these people do not.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News