- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/28/25 at 1:17 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Nowhere in the law does it say that members of a terrorist organization can't be deported because it would be mean. In fact, the law says that use of this act is not up for judicial review
Oof...that is not what is in the constitution...the 14th amendment specifically
Posted on 3/28/25 at 1:26 am to TenWheelsForJesus
Trump declared a terrorist organization no one but him he makes things up hour by hour . You cannot take the law into your own hands just because it suites your agenda .
Posted on 3/28/25 at 1:35 am to AggieHank86
Thats not whats happening and any rational minded person knows it.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 2:02 am to David_DJS
quote:
My position is it's silly to think a district court can have the whole f'n country as a party before him
they don’t need the whole
country, the defendants are various executive officers and agencies including Trump.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:11 am to David_DJS
He can’t defend it but also would never say anything that might appear to be in favor of OMB so he doubles down
Posted on 3/28/25 at 4:19 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
You cannot take the law into your own hands just because it suites your agenda .
Agree. That’s exactly what the judge did. So you support impeachment ?
Posted on 3/28/25 at 6:21 am to DawgCountry
We the people will not let this country turn into a free for all this is not Russia we do not cater to and old fart who is a Narcissist if you don’t like it a plane leaves for Central America every hour .
Posted on 3/28/25 at 6:35 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
not subject to judicial review by any lower court.
This is interfering with an official governmental proceeding by these judges.
(where have you heard that before? J6ers)
This is interfering with an official governmental proceeding by these judges.
(where have you heard that before? J6ers)
Posted on 3/28/25 at 6:39 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
We the people will not let this country turn into a free for all
Shut the frick up, your 5th grade educated arse isn't going to do shite.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 8:44 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
Judge A in District A has no authority outside of District A.
Unfortunately our federal laws are not written that way
As long as the court has subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdiction the authority of the court on the issue presented to it would cover Virtually everything Specially if it's involved interstate commerce
I am firmly against the ability to issue a temporary injunction based on the allegations of one party without the participation of a second party And for no real appellate review Initially and I think Congress could change that
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Hard to say.
If the DJ decides properly on the PI, a matter of weeks. If he rules incorrectly, the Administration will almost certainly pursue an expedited appeal, in which case another month or three at the Circuit. If it goes all the way to SCOTUS, longer.
All that also does not address the potential of orders enjoining enforcement during appeals
Exactly, and this is why I argue all of this bullshite, in practice, puts the judiciary head/shoulders above the executive and legislative branches.
It's asinine.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:34 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
This isn't an unchecked power though.
Sure it is. It's about running out the clock on an administration's policy and in this view, it is unchecked power.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News