- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fed Judge in Boston to keep EBT food stamps
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:09 am to AubieinNC2009
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:09 am to AubieinNC2009
Well if she thinks she can force the executive to spend money in a way there is no law to do so, what’s keeping her from ruling that the democrats in the legislative must vote yes on to the CR and just reopen the government?
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:10 am to AubieinNC2009
Hope she has a huge line of credit.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:15 am to AubieinNC2009
To be reversed/overturned in a week or two.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:28 am to Barstools
quote:
How does she have the authority to do this
This better be a rhetorical question
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:35 am to AubieinNC2009
Say what you want the west coast, but MA is the most liberal, communistic state in the union. I can’t wait for the day they drive enough white collar business out of Boston through taxation that their economy collapses. They don’t produce anything tangible to prop them up
Posted on 10/31/25 at 7:45 am to AubieinNC2009
I wish I could get a bet card
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:22 am to el Gaucho
Until one of these activist judges gets removed from the bench, this will keep happening.
They continue to ignore the SCOTUS ruling on the limits of their jurisdiction, and try to force Trump to their will.
It’s embarrassing to the point of parody, but I don’t think the GOP has the numbers, or the balls, to impeach one.
They continue to ignore the SCOTUS ruling on the limits of their jurisdiction, and try to force Trump to their will.
It’s embarrassing to the point of parody, but I don’t think the GOP has the numbers, or the balls, to impeach one.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:25 am to AubieinNC2009
I'll go with "Examples of the judicial branch overreaching their constitutional powers for $1000 Alex."
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:25 am to Placekicker
Insert Slo Flo “achually” meme
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 9:14 am
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:27 am to MMauler
quote:
What fricking authority does she have to do anything outside of Massachusetts?
She doesn't even have that authority in Massachusetts.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:29 am to Clockwatcher68
quote:
Why not issue a writ of mandamus compelling the dems to pass the continuing resolution while you are at it?
Woah woah woah, and act like a King?
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:39 am to AubieinNC2009
It's not an emergency. It is a Democrat caused crisis but not an emergency. The judge could have just the same issues an order requiring the Democrat Senators to pass the CR to avoid the crisis.
Ordering the Senate to pass the CR is the same as ordering the govt to fund a program during a shutdown that does not fund the government.
Republicans should be nailing this point across the media to avert this judges ruling ahead of time.
Ordering the Senate to pass the CR is the same as ordering the govt to fund a program during a shutdown that does not fund the government.
Republicans should be nailing this point across the media to avert this judges ruling ahead of time.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 8:59 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
frick you. Random pissant judges are not supposed to run the executive branch.
I was being sarcastic you motherfricking retard.
Posted on 10/31/25 at 9:02 am to AubieinNC2009
“No Kings” except when we want
Posted on 10/31/25 at 11:01 am to lsuson
The issue is that there aren't enough funds in the emergency fund to fully provide SNAP benefits. There is, supposedly, $5 billion in emergency funds but the total monthly cost for SNAP is close to $9 billion. Does Trump have to issue half funds to everyone? If so what about those who get the statutory minimum of $16 a month, it's illegal to issue less than $16 so you can't give them $8. If you give those people $16 and halve everyone else then there is a discrimination aspect to it. If you don't halve everyone then how do you decide who gets the benefits and who doesn't? Again, discriminatory.
There is no way to fund SNAP in November because of how many people in this country are reliant on daddy government to eat.
There is no way to fund SNAP in November because of how many people in this country are reliant on daddy government to eat.
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 11:02 am
Popular
Back to top

0





