- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/16/23 at 1:52 pm to GeauxGutsy
quote:
Dominion could go on record admitting to the steal and nothing would happen. What’s done is done.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 1:54 pm to deeprig9
quote:
It prints it out, you literally go down your paper ballot and verify all of it is how you voted, and then slide it into a secure bin thingy.
The Dominion "tablulator" is reading the QR code, not the text printout of what you believe is the votes you're casting for your desired candidate.
Unless you have some kind of cybernetic implant that lets you read QR codes like your phone camera, you have no guarantee who you're voting for.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 1:55 pm to deeprig9
quote:You understand thousands and thousands of Georgia machine ballots were competed in the Fulton Co VM test center prior to the election?
In Georgia, the dominion machine prints out your ballot on paper, which you verify all your votes are correct, which you put in a separate bin.
Nah, nevermind. You obviously don't. Otherwise you'd never have posted that nonsense.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 2:18 pm to Gifman
I read the study this morning and I agree, the Dominion process is loaded with vulnerabilities, most obvious is the QR code method. I questioned the ballot QR code vulnerabilities the first time I voted with it, years ago. It is an intentionally designed vulnerability, to hide fraud and exclude competition from the voting system business:
(1) As the QR code is what the scanner reads. The scanner doesn't even look for the names you voted for. The QR code could be anything and you would have no idea what it is.
(2) Also, the code is proprietary, so if you took a pic of the code to take away with you, you still would not know what it represents. No one can interpret the code without Dominion keys
(3) Why not use OCR and read the names? At least voters would know for sure what was on the ballot
(4) with OCR, any contractor could count the ballots during an audit and any auditor could visually read the ballot content
(5) OCR would remove on major fraud vulnerability
Some would argue that OCR is not fast enough or accurate enough but that is a lie. Those ballot scanners read one ballot at a time, so it does not require a fast process. Ballots can be printed with an OCR friendly font. The voter walks up to a scanner and lays it in the feeder one at a time. It could be a simple strait forward process.
QR codes have a lot of valid applications but counting ballots is not one of them
(1) As the QR code is what the scanner reads. The scanner doesn't even look for the names you voted for. The QR code could be anything and you would have no idea what it is.
(2) Also, the code is proprietary, so if you took a pic of the code to take away with you, you still would not know what it represents. No one can interpret the code without Dominion keys
(3) Why not use OCR and read the names? At least voters would know for sure what was on the ballot
(4) with OCR, any contractor could count the ballots during an audit and any auditor could visually read the ballot content
(5) OCR would remove on major fraud vulnerability
Some would argue that OCR is not fast enough or accurate enough but that is a lie. Those ballot scanners read one ballot at a time, so it does not require a fast process. Ballots can be printed with an OCR friendly font. The voter walks up to a scanner and lays it in the feeder one at a time. It could be a simple strait forward process.
QR codes have a lot of valid applications but counting ballots is not one of them
Posted on 6/16/23 at 2:30 pm to FlexDawg
1000000% designed this way
Posted on 6/16/23 at 2:39 pm to deeprig9
quote:
This is all bull shite.
quote:
In Georgia, the dominion machine prints out your ballot on paper, which you verify all your votes are correct, which you put in a separate bin. In every recount district, the paper ballots matched the electronic count exactly. If someone hacked the dominion machines to switch votes from Trump to Biden, then the e-count would not match the paper count.
I guess you missed the part about QR codes.
I get it, you love your establishment bros., and the government could never possibly rig elections. Stay comfy in the matrix; the truth is too hard for most to handle.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 2:45 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
1000000% designed this way
Yes, and each vote has a paper trail; and the producers of the cheat ensures that it’s audit proof with a paper trail, this is how we have changed regimes without war, but never thought they would use the tech in America
Posted on 6/16/23 at 2:46 pm to FlexDawg
Another reason why the fox lawsuit doesn't make sense me.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 2:56 pm to ChexMix
quote:
Can we not sue them to stop using Dominion??? I dont fricking get it. Its a failed system and we have to use it?
Yous gots no standing dogg...pssshh posh you citizenry and your idea of "rights". Cute. *taps your head*
Seriously though... anyone know who would have "standing" to sue over this being used prior or would the vote need to happen first...then rinse repeat for a few yrs??
Posted on 6/16/23 at 3:44 pm to deeprig9
*nevermind*
This post was edited on 6/16/23 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 6/16/23 at 3:54 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
The Dominion "tablulator" is reading the QR code, not the text printout of what you believe is the votes you're casting for your desired candidate.
Unless you have some kind of cybernetic implant that lets you read QR codes like your phone camera, you have no guarantee who you're voting for.
Then why did every hand recount of in-person votes match up perfectly with the electronic results?
Why did they bother with mules if they controlled the machines?
This post was edited on 6/16/23 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 6/16/23 at 4:40 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:every citizen in Georgia would be my guess.
Seriously though... anyone know who would have "standing" to sue over this being used prior or would the vote need to happen first...then rinse repeat for a few yrs??
Posted on 6/16/23 at 4:57 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Then why did every hand recount of in-person votes match up perfectly with the electronic results?
Your premise that the "hand recount" did more than just rerun the printed ballots through the machines.
Time to dust this one off, I see...
Posted on 6/16/23 at 4:57 pm to deeprig9
quote:
In Georgia, the dominion machine prints out your ballot on paper, which you verify all your votes are correct, which you put in a separate bin. In every recount district, the paper ballots matched the electronic count exactly.
I'll address this one item.
Election day for me and my 10 local voters who were the first in the door of our precinct were handed blank sheets of paper. Not forms, blank copy paper. The precinct being run by a Democrat could not (or would not) unlock the highly secure dominion machines. 30 minutes go by. They then try to tell us we've already voted. Nope. Try again. That's when we are handed blank pieces of paper, sat at a table that they've thrown up and told to write in our vote. We were all at the table at the same time. I could see what everyone else wrote. We were then instructed to deposit our forms in that secondary bin. We were all assured that our vote is counted.
So...sounds like, if it's the way you describe it, our votes didn't count, because the machines, when they did get turned on, would not have had our votes and therefore not matched exactly....
Posted on 6/16/23 at 5:56 pm to Bulldogblitz
I would imagine that you just described 10 Biden votes.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 6:16 pm to VoxDawg
I fully understand the difference between a recount and an audit. And I'm convinced an actual audit in Georgia would have shown Trump won the state by a decent margin.
What the recounts showed is the paper "receipts" that are checked (by every individual voter before it goes in the bin) matched up with the electronic counts for the precinct. So if the machines were being manipulated, the e-counts would not match the paper counts.
The fraud in Georgia was in the mail-in ballots, not the in-person voting on dominion machines.
Also, even if Raffy did the right thing and audited and found the votes for Trump in Georgia, Trump still loses because of Penn, Mich, AZ, Wiscy. I think that might have been the reason Raffy didn't roll up his sleeves and do his job, because even if he was successful, it still wouldn't have changed the outcome nationally.
Slope-skulled morons act like Georgia is the reason Biden is in the white house.
What the recounts showed is the paper "receipts" that are checked (by every individual voter before it goes in the bin) matched up with the electronic counts for the precinct. So if the machines were being manipulated, the e-counts would not match the paper counts.
The fraud in Georgia was in the mail-in ballots, not the in-person voting on dominion machines.
Also, even if Raffy did the right thing and audited and found the votes for Trump in Georgia, Trump still loses because of Penn, Mich, AZ, Wiscy. I think that might have been the reason Raffy didn't roll up his sleeves and do his job, because even if he was successful, it still wouldn't have changed the outcome nationally.
Slope-skulled morons act like Georgia is the reason Biden is in the white house.
Posted on 6/16/23 at 6:18 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
I'll address this one item.
Election day for me and my 10 local voters who were the first in the door of our precinct were handed blank sheets of paper. Not forms, blank copy paper. The precinct being run by a Democrat could not (or would not) unlock the highly secure dominion machines. 30 minutes go by. They then try to tell us we've already voted. Nope. Try again. That's when we are handed blank pieces of paper, sat at a table that they've thrown up and told to write in our vote. We were all at the table at the same time. I could see what everyone else wrote. We were then instructed to deposit our forms in that secondary bin. We were all assured that our vote is counted.
So...sounds like, if it's the way you describe it, our votes didn't count, because the machines, when they did get turned on, would not have had our votes and therefore not matched exactly....
Was this in Georgia?
Posted on 6/16/23 at 6:18 pm to FlexDawg
The people in charge of this should be hung
Posted on 6/16/23 at 6:20 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
TigerOnTheMountain
One that claimed all is good.
quote:
Do something about it, pussy.
POS!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News