Started By
Message

re: FDR, Pearl Harbor, The “Great Man” Myth And The True Historical Record…

Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:03 am to
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
19089 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:03 am to
We could have stopped it when that aircraft carrier went back through the wormhole. We did shoot down one Zero.

Watch the documentary The Final Countdown with Kirk Douglas.







Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35870 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:08 am to
They knew war with Japan was imminent. What surprised FDR , etc was that the Japanese would attack Pearl. They figured the Phillipines. Most military strategists at the time thought that Pearl could be subject to harassment by subs....but a large scale aerial attack was thought to be unlikely

It was a most impressive operation devised by Yamamoto. Audacious and he knew it.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:12 am to
quote:

I don't see how you can accused the U.S. government of the same thing.



Once again, Roosevelt’s Secretary of War actively discussed how best to provoke Japan: that is a documented fact. Likewise, it is not a conspiracy theory to claim that the Roosevelt Administration engaged in a cover-up to divert blame for its own failures onto military commanders.

These two assertions are grounded in an objective analysis of the historical record. Since I am repeating myself here, you may have the last word if you so choose.

Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69694 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Once again, Roosevelt’s Secretary of War actively discussed how best to provoke Japan: that is a documented fact. Likewise, it is not a conspiracy theory to claim that the Roosevelt Administration engaged in a cover-up to divert blame for its own failures onto military commanders.


1. You are missing important context. Stimson did indeed write in his diary on November 25, 1941, just two weeks before the Japanese attack, about how discussions were being had at the highest levels of maneuvering Japan into firing the first shot of a potential war. What you fail to mention, however, is that by this time talks between the United States and Japan had already broken down and we knew from the cracking of their diplomatic codes that the Japanese believed hostilities were imminent. Naturally we would want the Japanese to fire the first shot if they believed the two countries were on a collision course. And as has been documented multiple times in this thread, two days after Stimson wrote about maneuvering the Japanese into firing the first shot of a potential war, he had the Chief of Naval Operations send out a message to the high command in the Pacific that war was considered imminent. That's not a cover-up if you are broadcasting it to your operational commanders in the field.

2. No, it's not a conspiracy theory to claim that the Roosevelt Administration engaged in a cover-up to divert blame for its own failures onto military commanders. That's just called politics. If you honestly think that Roosevelt was going to let himself swing for not having the army and navy properly ready for a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor then you are just plain naive.


This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 8:23 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135581 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:24 am to
quote:

we knew from the cracking of their diplomatic codes that the Japanese believed hostilities were imminent.
I don't doubt the truth of your statement at all, but has this ever been firmly proven?
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Watch the documentary The Final Countdown with Kirk Douglas.




It almost is a documentary. The scenes shot on the USS Nimitz largely featured actual footage of Navy crewmen conducting drills.



It is an underrated science fiction gem. 5 thumbs up!


Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135581 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:33 am to
FDR and Churchill had a long-standing relationship beginning with Roosevelt's stent as secretary of the Navy in World War I, and Churchill's correspondent role in Britain. That relationship encompassed sinking of the Lusitania.

So the two had already been involved in a major military cover-up. Whether or not the US was as far along in breaking the Japanese code as you imply, Britain had broken it. Britain's far east stations almost certainly had intercepted information specific to the Japanese plans for attack.

Whether they shared those facts with FDR, and the US, has never been revealed to the best of my knowledge. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that Churchill would have determined not to share the information though, lest the US persuade Japan, directly or indirectly away from attacking. Churchill badly wanted the US in the war.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Narax




Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Churchill badly wanted the US in the war.

That is definitely undeniable.

https://artsandculture.google.com/story/pearl-harbor-why-was-the-attack-a-surprise-u-s-national-archives/5QVRxdyVqxIA8A?hl=en

Here is some good actual photographs of what we definitely knew.
This includes the Letters to the Former Naval Person

This includes documents marked TOP SECRET-ULTRA
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.


Agreed, there is no shame being fooled once, FDR as you said did try to find scapegoats for the massive screw up, but now that a number of people have given you buckets of sources and documents that directly refute your claims of an initial hiding of the impending attack from field commanders, it is your call if you want to be "fooled again".

Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
14111 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:45 am to
I suspect the attack on Pearl Harbor was orchestrated in orer to get us into the War.
If we were worried about Japan, why did we send our troops to Europe?
I suspect we entered the war to protect the Soviet Union. Germany was invading the Soviet Union.
As Trump has stated, the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans protect the USA. No way Germany or Japan could wage war on the USA successfully.
Too bad Patton didn't live long enough to inform the American people.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

a number of people have given you buckets of sources and documents that directly refute your claims of an initial hiding of the impending attack from field commanders, it is your call if you want to be "fooled again".



You obviously can’t read or comprehend source documents if you are making such a claim.

So F.O. you illiterate troll!


Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:01 am to
quote:

You obviously can’t read or comprehend source documents if you are making such a claim.


You do know there are multiple people who have given you references to the war orders that Short and Kimmel got in November.

Kimmel and Short literally had a meeting to discuss the messages they had gotten from DC about the war being impending.

quote:

Kimmel ordered USS Enterprise to ferry Marine fighters and pilots to Wake Island to reinforce the garrison, and for USS Lexington to depart Pearl Harbor on December 5 to ferry Marine dive bombers to Midway


He knew, and he was acting on the instructions he received from Washington, his forces were preparing for an imminent attack, for weeks.

Short was putting in place measures to protect against sabotage at Pearl that would prevent Pearl from supporting exposed positions at Wake and Guam.

They fully knew War was coming soon and were acting on it.

The field commanders just guessed the wrong place.

No one in DC knew Pearl, no one in the field guessed Pearl.

When we realized that Japan was declaring war, the message went out to the Military 20 minutes after it got to the president. Due to a screw up it got to Pearl a few hours late.

But no one guessed that right then and there it was going to be Pearl.

And to note the Philippines got hit 9 hours later, and had plenty of warning.

No one here is denying Roosevelt looked for scapegoats, you keep bringing that up as if anyone here is denying it.

I guess you want the shame of being fooled again.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 9:07 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69694 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I don't doubt the truth of your statement at all, but has this ever been firmly proven?



I mean, yeah...

September 24, 1941:

“If by the early part of October the Japanese-American negotiations do not show signs of progress, we will decide upon our course of action.”

November 5, 1941:

“The Imperial Government has decided that if by November 25th an agreement is not reached, Japan will take action.”

November 14, 1941:

“The situation is extremely critical. The United States is showing no signs of compromise.”

November 16, 1941:

“We are making our final efforts, but the situation is such that war may break out at any moment.”

November 22, 1941:

“This time we mean it, that the deadline absolutely cannot be changed.”

November 29, 1941:

“This is an ultimatum. If we cannot reach agreement, negotiations will end.”

December 1-6, 1941:

Japan sends the famous 14-part message to their embassy in Washington that basically said/did the following:

1. Formally ended negotiations
2. Accused the U.S. of bad faith
3. Signaled that relations were effectively over

This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 9:06 am
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:


Kimmel ordered USS Enterprise to ferry Marine fighters and pilots to Wake Island to reinforce the garrison, and for USS Lexington to depart Pearl Harbor on December 5 to ferry Marine dive bombers to Midway



So fricking what? I never have claimed Kimmel and Short have no blame for Pearl Harbor. It is a straw man argument you fricking low-wattage moron.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

So fricking what? I never have claimed Kimmel and Short have no blame for Pearl Harbor. It is a straw man argument you fricking low-wattage moron.


Not thinking clearly are you?

You were claiming that they were unfairly targeted by Roosevelt for being unprepared, and I am giving you evidence that they were actually trying to prepare for what they thought was going to happen. They guessed wrong.
Most people here do not believe that their mistakes were the only ones made.

You actually posted
quote:

Oh. And by the way: below is an image of the proclamation by the Pearl Harbor Survivors Association posthumously recognizing that Admiral Kimmel was shamelessly tarnished by the political machinations of the Roosevelt Administration:


Can you keep your story straight?
Posted by Floyd Dawg
Silver Creek, GA
Member since Jul 2018
4903 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:36 am to
Lend-Lease was blatantly unconstitutional as well.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Not thinking clearly are you?








You are a grotesque pantomime who revels in an utter lack of self-awareness.

That Kimmel and Short were caught flat-footed and did not anticipate an attack at Pearl Harbor does not erase the fact that they were victims of a virulent propaganda campaign by the Roosevelt Administration to unjustly take the lion’s share of the blame for the catastrophic attack.




This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 10:18 am
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 10:23 am to
quote:

That Kimmel and Short were caught flat-footed and did not anticipate an attack at Pearl Harbor does not erase the fact that they were victims of a virulent propaganda campaign by the Roosevelt Administration to unjustly take the lion’s share of the blame for the catastrophic attack.



See everyone here is fine, and has been fine with that as a line of argument.

The entire thread.

If you have now backed your argument down to that then I have no complaints.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

See everyone here is fine, and has been fine with that as a line of argument.

The entire thread.

If you have now backed your argument down to that then I have no complaints.





Reread the OP, slowly and out loud to yourself.

Not only does nothing I stated in subsequent posts* contradict the stated premise, but my subsequent comments have reinforced and bolstered the primary argument.



*Excepting of course my “…and nanny-boo-boo-to-you too!” responses that are admittedly puerile in nature. But you will get what you give with me!

Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram