Started By
Message

re: FDR, Pearl Harbor, The “Great Man” Myth And The True Historical Record…

Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:49 pm to
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3742 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 5:49 pm to
On 22 October 1941, during an exercise taking place in heavy fog, the ship was hit in the bow by the Oklahoma. Arizona had been scheduled to depart for Bremerton Navy Yard in November to undergo an overhaul. The accident instead required her to be dry-docked at Pearl Harbor for repairs to the collision damage. As a result, she remained in Hawaii.

Ruane, Michael (6 December 2016). "The USS Arizona wasn't supposed to be at Pearl Harbor, but it became America's most famous battleship". The Washington Post. Retrieved 3 February 2022.

I found this in under 1 minute online and have known of this since 2000 or earlier.

I told many historians of this more than 10 years ago.

I Have detail reports of this event.



Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

If you exclude the fact that intercepted Japanese communications clearly indicated that war was certain if successful negotiations with the U.S. had not been reached when November came to a close. Again, Naval intelligence was indeed busy throughout November intercepting and encrypting messages that indicated the threat from Japan was building day by day.


Noting that this was a closely guarded secret that would save many American lives.
quote:

Whether the Roosevelt Administration knew that the Japanese would attack Pearl Harbor at exactly 7:48 a.m. Hawaiian time on December 7th 1941 is of secondary importance to the fact that the Roosevelt Administration were privy to intercepted intelligence that clearly indicated Japan was planning a military strike against Anglo-American forces. This was no idle threat: Japan — a militaristic culture which extolled the ideal that ritual suicide was preferable to dishonor — had demonstrated in the Second Sino-Japanese War that it possessed a deadly ruthless and efficient military.


quote:

Admiral Kimmel and General short were both sent "war warning"
messages on November 27. They were advised that negotiations were
stalemated and that Japan might take hostile action at any moment.
Admiral Kimmel was ordered to execute a "defensive deployment"
consistent with the us war plan in the Pacific; General short was
ordered to undertake "reconnaissance and other measures ... ", but his
instructions were muddied somewhat by advice to avoid actions that would
"alarm [Hawaii's] civil population or disclose intent."
c. Admiral Kimmel and General short discussed the November 27 war
warning, but concluded that an attack would occur in the western
Pacific, not in Hawaii. Indeed, the November 27 messa~es had mentioned
the likelihood that the attack would occur in "the Philippines, Thai or
Kra Peninsula or .... Borneo." Washington also did not expect Hawaii to
be attacked. Further, it appears that Admiral Kimmel and General short
were depending on timely tactical warning from Washington, should Hawaii
become a target. Military leaders in Washington, on the other hand,
appear to have felt that the November 27 war warning would lead Admiral
Kimmel and General short to heighten their vigilance, and failed to
examine closely what they actually were doing
.


quote:

The documented evidence presented in the official Congressional inquiry into the Pearl Harbor attack demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that by December 1 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Secretary of War Henry Stimson were well aware that Japan was going to attack Anglo-American forces — sooner rather than later.


Yes, they were told.

quote:

Washington, Tuesday, November 25

Marshall and Stark attended a “War Council” meeting with the President, Secretary of State Cordell Hull, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, and Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox. Were the Japanese bluffing? Hull thought not; rejection of their terms would mean war. “These fellows mean to fight,” he told the group. “You [Marshall and Stark] will have to be prepared.”

Adequate preparation could not be guaranteed by either service chief. The great draft army was still only a partly disciplined mass. The Navy, better prepared for an immediate fight, was still far from ready for an extended period of combat. Marshall urged diplomatic delay. If the State Department could hold war off for even three months, the time gained would be precious, especially in the Philippines, where Douglas MacArthur’s newly raised Commonwealth Army was only partly organized and equipped.



quote:

Further, key officials in the Roosevelt administration were actively seeking to provoke Japan into such an attack.

Japan had already decided they were going to war with us, no one needed to provoke them.

quote:

Nevertheless, the Roosevelt Administration did not share the full extent of this threat with their military commanders. Roosevelt further assured the American people that good faith diplomatic negotiations with Japan were still in progress when in fact they knew that the Japan was on the brink of an attack.


quote:

Honolulu, Tuesday, November 25

Kimmel and Short had more than a passing interest in the status of our negotiations with Japan. Admiral Kimmel had been kept informed of the increasingly strained relations by frequent frank and newsy letters from Admiral Stark. One of these, dated November 7, had said in part: “Things seem to be moving steadily towards a crisis in the Pacific.…A month may see, literally, most anything…It doesn’t look good.”

Admiral Kimmel undoubtedly was thinking of that letter when he reread the official radio message which he had received the day before, November 24:

Chances of favorable outcomes of negotiations with Japan very doubtful…A surprise aggressive movement in any direction including attack on Philippines or Guam is a possibility. Chief of Staff has seen this dispatch, concurs and requests action addressees to inform senior Army officers their areas. Utmost secrecy necessary in order not to complicate an already tense situation or precipitate Japanese action.



quote:

Finally and perhaps most shamefully, the Roosevelt Administration ascribed responsibility for the Pearl Harbor disaster to be placed solely on General Short and Admiral Kimmel while effectively shielding senior Administration officials from comparable scrutiny. It was a despicable act of scapegoating.

Why is that "Most shamefully"

They both messed up, bad commanders get fired.

They earned a lot of blame.

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Personnel_Related/16-F-1171%20Dorn%20Report%20on%20Kimmel%20and%20Short%201995.pdf

quote:

These issues are immediate and highly emotional to the descendants of
Admiral Kimmel and General short. [lJ Family members feel that the Pearl
Harbor commanders were scapegoats for a disaster that they could neither
prevent nor mitigate, and that others who were blameworthy escaped both
official censure and public humiliation
.


quote:

It was a despicable act of scapegoating.

It wasn't, they messed up big time.

quote:

it was a gross dereliction of duty by the Roosevelt Administration to not inform the military commanders of vulnerable outposts in the Pacific about the increasing evidence that Japan was preparing a major strike against both British and American forces.


quote:

they were advised that negotiations were
stalemated and that Japan might take hostile action at any moment.



How much more could they be told, seriously?
https://www.americanheritage.com/pearl-harbor-who-blundered

quote:

Now, it was suggested elsewhere that to dare question the motives of the Roosevelt Administration when it comes to Pearl Harbor is in some way an affront to Pearl Harbor survivors. Nothing could be further from the truth: we have a sacred duty to inform future generations of Americans that in times of war, moral considerations often may be eclipsed by calculated political manipulation aimed at achieving foreign policy objectives.


It was and it still is, they never agreed to being part of your magical conspiracy theory.

I've posted a lot of information that directly refutes your claims, who knew what when.

There is no need for your false conspiracy claims. Especially tied to the hero's of Pearl who cannot agree to your tying them to your crusader.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

I Have detail reports of this event.

You lying idiot, I was quite clear that I was speaking about your "mysterious notes" person who recorded Roosevelt, not some completely unrelated random accident at sea.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:23 pm to
quote:


But political scapegoating is not a conspiracy. It's just politics
.

As discussed in great depth above, the coverup of the Roosevelt Administration’s knowledge of the certainty of a Japanese attack certainly was an orchestrated conspiracy.

quote:

Why do you think FDR canned Kimmel and Short but didn't can MacArthur?




Possibly because MacArthur — unlike the relatively unknown Kimmel and Short — had a clique of sympathetic defenders in the press who would rise to MacArthur’s cause if they believed he had been unfairly maligned. The Roosevelt Administration further needed a larger-than-life military hero to unify the American public after the disastrous attack at Pearl Harbor and MacArthur perfectly filled that bill.

quote:

Despite his failure to decisively defend the Philippines, MacArthur consistently had one of the lower casualties rates of any commander in the blood-bowl that was the Pacific Theater of Operations.

This is a remarkable statement considering MacArthur was responsible for the single largest surrender of US forces in history.




That is why I qualified that statement with the preface about MacArthur’s failure in the Philippines. It certainly wasn’t my intent to gloss over such a significant strategic loss.

quote:

But I'm still curious about how FDR goaded the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor. Apart from the embargo of oil and steel, what actions did he take, exactly?


Cutting off Japan — a relatively small island nation — from vitally needed raw materials while it was in a war with China seems to be a rather serious provocation. I certainly would argue that Japan viewed it as such.

quote:


Once Japan was cut off from US oil, the strategic objective of the East Indies, and thus the elimination of the Philippine threat, was obvious. Is that justification for continuing to supply Japan with war materiel?


I would argue that the American economic embargo was seen by Japan as an aggressive act of war. It thus led Japan to consider military campaigns in Burma and the Dutch East Indies as means to seize necessary resources.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 6:48 pm
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3742 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:37 pm to
Narax so now I'm only partly lying as i knew about the USS Arizonia?

The is nothing as I did my first report on Peral Harbor in 1969.

So. was Kimmel getting the magic interceptions?

Because in the first investigate it was flat out told by one of the persons (Turner) in charge he was in Nov-Dec 1941, which was found out not to be the truth in the second investigation.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Narax so now I'm only partly lying as i knew about the USS Arizonia?

No, you said
quote:

The meeting on NOV 28th is the smoking gun, no minutes of that meeting were kept. In that meeting FDR flat out told Marshall, his sub commander and the 2 Admirals that the US would not strike the first blow and Japan would have to attack first. The US Would not go on full alert, as he wanted the attack to be seen as a surprise attack. No one was to keep any notes of this meeting, but the one person did, and it came out in a book in 1947/8.


I asked you

quote:

So he was just scribbling away while they spoke and no one noticed?


You then claimed
quote:

He took the notes after the meeting and it was found out during the second investigation of the attack, which can also be found in the record of the second investigation.


You have then tried to repeatedly change the topic.

I replied to you
quote:

You know what a source is right?

Do you care to provide a source to this thing you claim happened?

Let's see your sources...

Specifically about this second investigation and secret notes


Don't keep pretending to be dumb.

Put up your sources on that or admit that you made it up.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

I've posted a lot of information that directly refutes your claims, who knew what when.



And I have replied with relevant counterpoints. I have enjoyed the civil discussion. We can disagree without being disagreeable.



quote:

There is no need for your false conspiracy claims. Especially tied to the hero's of Pearl who cannot agree to your tying them to your crusader.


Back to that? Oh well.

Such is life. I tried.




This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 6:47 pm
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3742 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:05 pm to
Toomer Deplorable
You did great job!


Right now, i am having to reread a book from 1947/8 on the second investigate.

You need that book.

As we all know a copy of the first investigation runs around 3,000.

Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Back to that? Oh well.

It was uncalled for and unneeded to try to drag them into something that is openly conspiracy theory.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69694 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

As discussed in great depth above, the coverup of the Roosevelt Administration’s knowledge of the certainty of a Japanese attack certainly was an orchestrated conspiracy.



There was no cover-up .

A warning of imminent Japanese aggression went out to U.S. forces in the Pacific a full 10 days before the attack on Pearl Harbor. They knew from Japanese diplomatic communications that war between the United States and Japan was imminent - they just did not know the target of that imminent aggression.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Right now, i am having to reread a book from 1947/8 on the second investigate.


Title?

Publisher?

Copyright?

quote:

As we all know a copy of the first investigation runs around 3,000.

Wha?
That would be the Roberts Commission? (unless you mean Knox, which is also below)
https://www.nsa.gov/History/Cryptologic-History/Historical-Events/Article-View/Article/2740707/the-investigations/

Or this exact document?
https://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/roberts/roberts.html

Vs the Hart Inquiry which was the second.

https://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/hart/hart-26.html

Or how about here,

https://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/invest.html

Every single investigation.

For free.

I guess I saved you a lot of money.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 8:25 pm
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3750 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 2:11 am to
quote:

a clique of sympathetic defenders in the press who would rise to MacArthur’s cause if they believed he had been unfairly maligned.

"Unfairly maligned"? That's where this all just starts to look like partisan bullshite. MacArthur had 10 hours warning AFTER the actual bombing of Pearl Harbor. There's no need for putting him on any further alert, it's game ON. And still no planes in the air, and not a peep about gross incompetence . That blame is obvious and easy to place, yet all we hear about are the failings in Washington DC.

If MacArthur had been a Japanese officer himself under those circumstances, he would have performed seppuku, and if not then, certainly on Corregidor.
quote:

Cutting off Japan — a relatively small island nation — from vitally needed raw materials while it was in a war with China seems to be a rather serious provocation. I certainly would argue that Japan viewed it as such.
...
I would argue that the American economic embargo was seen by Japan as an aggressive act of war. It thus led Japan to consider military campaigns in Burma and the Dutch East Indies as means to seize necessary resources.

And that's all I ever been able to find as well.

It's ridiculous on its face.

So , if we decide we don't want to trade with someone because of their belligerence, it's tantamount to a declaration of war? Are we not free to trade with whom we please, and not with whom displeases us?

I guess when Standard Oil was selling large batch octane control technology to the Germans in the 30s, and then was forced to stop by the government, that was reason for Germany to declare war on us? Are we to be held hostage by our trading partners?

So Japan was pissed, frick them. Let them do something about it.

They tried. It was a surprisingly hard first blow.

While no one could predict how far their reach could be, the Japanese were still seen as an inferior people, everyone saw what the eventual outcome would be - even the highest admiral of the IJN himself. It was folly from the start. They gave it their best shot, and predictably were toast in 6 months. From our perspective, Pearl Harbor looks like a catastrophe, but from Japan's perspective, they stumbled out the gate, and then fell flat on their faces. I bet they'll never try that again.

That's why I have such a hard time blaming FDR for the damage to the fleet at Pearl Harbor. After all, it wasn't even destroyed. Too bad it was too dark for Nishimura to actually see them all lined up crossing his T in the Surigao Strait.

FDR's socialist policies for dealing with the depression were not only unsuccessful, but in many cases judged to be unlawful. His negotiations with Stalin were shockingly naive and led directly to the Cold War. But his cutting off trade with Japan was not the war he was looking for in Germany. Of all the shite he can reasonably be blamed for, cutting off war materiel and positioning the Pacific Fleet to be able to respond to the subsequent Japanese threat to the Philippines made strategic sense at the time. And, ultimately, FDR gave us the strongest military the world had ever seen.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Unfairly maligned"? That's where this all just starts to look like partisan bullshite. MacArthur had 10 hours warning AFTER the actual bombing of Pearl Harbor.



Perhaps you misunderstood my comment. To clarify, I’m not making that claim nor am I excusing MacArthur’s failure to defend the Philippines.

Very much like Trump, Douglass MacArthur often had an adversarial relationship with the press. And though MacArthur had many critics in the press, MacArthur also had many admirers in the American public.

Journalists thus knew MacArthur was always good for a headline and copy. This dynamic ensured that MacArthur was one of the era’s most written-against — and written-bout — figures of his era.

The popular press would alternately demonize or lionize MacArthur depending upon the mood of the public. Again, after the strategic losses the allies had suffered in the weeks and months after Pearl Harbor, the American public was looking for a heroic figure to rally around and MacArthur perfectly fit that bill.

quote:

MacArthur’s relationship with the press was not one of mutual respect, but one of mutual exploitation. He used the press as a tool to craft and project the image he wanted to convey — that of a larger-than-life figure, a mythic hero whose will was unstoppable. While the journalists often had to search for the truth behind his carefully constructed public persona, MacArthur understood that perception was power. He used their stories to solidify his own legend, both in the United States and abroad. William Manchester: American Caesar.



MacArthur’s evacuation from the Philippines in March 1942 — though followed by a devastating defeat for the allies — was largely portrayed in the press as a triumphant vow by MacArthur to someday return and resume the fight. MacArthur was adept at uttering pithy lines and understood how a symbolic narrative of defiance and future liberation that would resonate emotionally with both American and Filipino audiences.

quote:

FDR's socialist policies for dealing with the depression were not only unsuccessful, but in many cases judged to be unlawful. His negotiations with Stalin were shockingly naive and led directly to the Cold War. But his cutting off trade with Japan was not the war he was looking for in Germany. Of all the shite he can reasonably be blamed for, cutting off war materiel and positioning the Pacific Fleet to be able to respond to the subsequent Japanese threat to the Philippines made strategic sense at the time. And, ultimately, FDR gave us the strongest military the world had ever seen.


President Roosevelt, ever the two faced political Janus, exhibited considerable ambiguity during the siege of Bataan. Roosevelt indicated support and relief were forthcoming to MacArthur in his radio messages, despite the fact that no such assistance was planned or even anticipated.

To make clear, this is not meant as a defense of MacArthur. I am simply highlighting the complex and often deceptive political maneuvering that can occur in wartime scenarios, where leaders aim to maintain morale or public support by manipulation through narrative building.



This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 7:31 am
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:28 am to
quote:

There was no cover-up .




Only if you strip the word “coverup” of it’s meaning.

Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23057 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:35 am to

I’m right leaning, and certainly don’t mind slamming leftists and their leaders, but the truth is all politicians are liars. They lie for a living.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:36 am to
quote:

It was uncalled for and unneeded to try to drag them into something that is openly conspiracy theory.




Hello Pot. I’m Kettle! I am pleased to make your acquaintance!

You imbuing your bizarre violent impulses upon the Pearl Harbor survivors is what was uncalled for.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:44 am to
quote:

You imbuing your bizarre violent impulses upon the Pearl Harbor survivors is what was uncalled for.

Yea you are now acknowledging that you have completely lost this argument.

Your claims of no warning were disproven.

There are records of the state department trying to delay the war to give the military more time.

And yes, if they were younger those Pearl Harbor vets would punch you in the face on behalf of their dead friends for your claims of the US pushing Japan into attacking Pearl, or that the United States somehow started the war.

The idea that Roosevelt or anyone else deliberately withheld information to allow Japan to attack us without our forces being ready is conclusively wrong.
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 7:48 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69694 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Only if you strip the word “coverup” of it’s meaning.



By that definition you can definitely accuse the Japanese of a cover-up. But I don't see how you can accused the U.S. government of the same thing. Admiral Stark, the Chief of Naval Operations, sent out a "war warning" message to Admiral Kimmel, commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, on November 27, 1941. This was a full 10 days prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. In this message, he informed Admiral Kimmel that war with Japan was considered imminent and could break out within the next few days. The very next day, Admiral Halsey and the USS Enterprise struck out from Pearl Harbor to deliver planes to Wake Island. While at sea, Halsey issued "Battle Order No. 1" where he informed his strike group that they were to fire upon any foreign vessel or aircraft without first giving warning. This order was given a full five days prior to Japan's surprise attack in the Pacific.

The U.S. military was primed and ready for war. They knew that war with Japan was about to kick off. Our intelligence analysts were able to discern that much from reading the Japanese diplomatic codes. They just didn't know WHERE the attack would fall because they had yet to significantly break the JN-25 naval codes. Major progress wouldn't develop on that score until the spring.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23495 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Narax


F.O.

Quit acting like you are here for any type meaningful dialogue.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
5986 posts
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:02 am to
quote:

F.O.

Quit acting like you are here for any type meaningful dialogue.

Look by now you have to know that you were a fool.

Beyond that you tried to spread your foolishness to others.

You shamed yourself by trying to tie the survivors into this.

I dont have to pretend your view is somehow sensible, its not, you had your chance to put forward your claims, but you were uninformed and flat out wrong.

I dont expect you to do anything more than act like a spoiled brat who wont admit he's wrong.

But lets see if you can at least prove that wrong.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram