- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FCC Chairman Ajit Pai: Why He's Rejecting Net Neutrality
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:30 pm to culsutiger
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:30 pm to culsutiger
quote:
I wish they would change the law. I'd much much rather have net neturality without title 2 classification. Unfortunately, that isn't currently possible.
Wait. It's not possible to change a law?
1
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Google is already moving in that direction.
You....literally didn't respond to anything that I said.
Your own cited article says they are having issues already with being constrained by limitations of how much data they can put in frequencies, and there is a BIG arse difference between the statement that the service being available at ALL vs it being the primary.
You
Cannot
Put
That
Much
Data
In
The
Air
In
A
WAN
On
A
Wide
Scale
And again....latency issues are still there.
Most users won't care, but there are many who will.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:31 pm to culsutiger
quote:
I think obamacare is an abomination.
Huh. Your style of arguing is very similar. (Did not mean that question as an offense, but your points are very similar in reasoning.)
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:32 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/18 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:32 pm to ShortyRob
I didn’t see it. I will be happy to answer if you repost and I see it.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:32 pm to CorporateTiger
You're sounding like a flat earther. Some wireless options require minimal ifrastucture upgrades
LINK
5-10 years you'll most likely have wireless internet to your home
LINK
5-10 years you'll most likely have wireless internet to your home
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:33 pm to Adam Banks
Free market? In many areas one or two companies own all the physical infrastructure and service the entire area. You feel the ISPs and cable companies are providing a high level of service now? If so, you have very low expectations as a consumer. These companies are already among the worst of the worst in terms of value and customer service.
You want them to assign dollar value to specific 0s and 1s?
Not very bright.
You want them to assign dollar value to specific 0s and 1s?
Not very bright.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:33 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/18 at 11:22 pm
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:33 pm to Volvagia
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:34 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
You have no other way to power home except your local power grid? Generators and solar panels just don’t exist
Just for the record since you guys think this is a gotcha. Those in fact are competitors
What are the cost of producing electricity on the grid to climb to unreasonable levels then all of the alternatives would be used at a greater level
Gas is also an alternative to the grid which is why some people have gas heat instead of electric heat and gas ovens instead of electric ovens.
The fact I can provide you a widget for a price you are willing to pay over my competitors widget doesn't make them not my competitor
How do you people not get this?
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Some wireless options require minimal ifrastucture upgrades
sighhhhh, wireless capabilities still has limitations compared to a fixed wired connection
quote:
5-10 years you'll most likely have wireless internet to your home
why do that when the QoS with a wired connection is better?
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:34 pm to culsutiger
quote:
Sure it is, but it hasn't happened. What part of the FCC has to operate within the law as it exists do you not get?
Change the law. The fricker was written in the 30s
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:35 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
I didn’t see it. I will be happy to answer if you repost and I see it
Okay. Is a Kia a competitor to a BMW? How about a motorcycle? How about a moped?
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:35 pm to culsutiger
quote:
No they don't. What is going on now is an FCC ruling within the current regulatory framework passed by Congress.
Congress can change that framework whenever they please. They don't need the FCC to damn thing before they can change the law.
Sorry, poor wording. They would have to undo the re-classification. Better?
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:36 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
why do that when the QoS with a wired connection is better?
It will not be better in a few years
Wireless is in your future. Get used to it
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Your own cited article says they are having issues already with being constrained by limitations of how much data they can put in frequencies, and there is a BIG arse difference between the statement that the service being available at ALL vs it being the primary.
I flat out SAID the technology is there in an earlier post.
The part where you are wrong is the statement that it will ever be the primary.
Or at least inside of the 50 year technology window.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:37 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
why do that when the QoS with a wired connection is better?
Because the vast majority (I'd guess 95%) don't have the latency and QoS requirements us ubergeeks do.
Which is going to hurt the wired ISPs and force them to offer better and better service.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:37 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Or at least inside of the 50 year technology window
ROFLMAO
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:37 pm to culsutiger
quote:
Sure it is, but it hasn't happened. What part of the FCC has to operate within the law as it exists do you not get?
Probably somewhere around the part that you aren't getting that this entire thread is about trying to change the law/classifications
I mean this is basically a giant discussion on ways to fix something that you say is currently not possible to do.
quote:
I wish they would change the law. I'd much much rather have net neturality without title 2 classification. Unfortunately, that isn't currently possible.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:37 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/3/18 at 11:22 pm
Page 12 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News