Started By
Message

re: FBI concluded Epstein didnt traffick to Rich men, backing up Kash Patel's claim - AP

Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75132 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Oh, I see. So now you're gonna argue the delineating values of sex trafficking. Someone throws out a number, that isn't "massive."

frick em. Just a few runaways, amirite?

Where did he argue this?
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65378 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Massey has destroyed this country

Holy shite.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11873 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I was arguing the scale of this purported sex trafficking.



Right. Because until anyone else is tried and convicted it won't exist in your world. If I told you Richard Branson is connected and involved in the same network doing the same shite you would laugh it off.

So really it's just you being you. Trying to win internet arguments by denying shite that's right in everyone's face and obvious to everyone else.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:50 pm to
This is doing a good job of confirming my theory as to why this was such a political hot potato once the CT really became ingrained in society
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Because until anyone else is tried and convicted it won't exist in your world

No. That's also a straw man.

There have been 2 criminal prosecutions, dozens of civil suits (with depositions), the release of his estate docs, and this massive released of millions of his documents, and the evidence just isn't there, apparently.

A little bit for Prince Andrew? Maybe, but that's about it.

quote:

. If I told you Richard Branson is connected and involved in the same network doing the same shite you would laugh it off.

I would ask you for the direct, credible evidence to judge.

Like I always do.

Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65378 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:53 pm to
Yeah, I guess Prince Andrew got disowned by the royal family and paid a huge settlement for absolutely no reason.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:55 pm to
I don't think when the Epstein Bros were pushing this CT, they limited it to Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew exclusively.

But if you have evidence for that limited CT, I'll give respect to the author.
Posted by Sunnyvale
Little ST. James
Member since Feb 2024
3340 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:57 pm to
Nothing to see here folks
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65378 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Epstein Bros
quote:

CT
You're fricking disgusting.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

You're fricking disgusting.


By being rational and following the actual evidence instead of creating fantasies?
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11873 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I guess Prince Andrew got disowned by the royal family and paid a huge settlement for absolutely no reason.


You see, what happened is that Epstein just owned all of the women and girls as his personal slaves. His private property. And all of those rich perverts who visited his island just had the ability to use his private property. So it isn't really sex trafficking, you see. And the hundreds and hundreds of people who visited the island doesn't constitute a sex trafficking ring that was truly "massive" in scale because it wasn't even trafficking. He kept them there as his personal property.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Why was this sender's name redacted?


Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

You see, what happened is that Epstein just owned all of the women and girls as his personal slaves. His private property. And all of those rich perverts who visited his island just had the ability to use his private property. So it isn't really sex trafficking, you see. And the hundreds and hundreds of people who visited the island doesn't constitute a sex trafficking ring that was truly "massive" in scale because it wasn't even trafficking. He kept them there as his personal property.

You're flailing. Bigly.

Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65378 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

actual evidence
This admin isn't going to give you 'actual evidence.' All we have to go on are Epstein's endless connections to Israel and rich jews.

You aren't going to be made an alpha slave for shilling like this. You aren't talented enough, so just quit.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
11873 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:02 pm to
No, as the FBI says, he didn't traffick them to those rich men. He just let them use them. They were his property. Trafficking them to someone implies a change of ownership. Epstein was just a modern day slaver is all. Except, he kept all of his slaves. He didn't sell them.

That's all I can glean from a combination of what the FBI says and your posts.
Posted by SJB901Tiger
901
Member since May 2019
107 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

What did you "literally read" that indicates this massive sex trafficking operation?


What are you talking about? Did you forget Ghislaine Maxwell is in federal prison primarily for her role in sex trafficking and grooming underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse network.

As a reminder:

In 2021, a U.S. federal jury convicted her on multiple charges, including, sex trafficking of a minor, transporting a minor for illegal sexual activity, conspiracy to transport minors for sexual activity and for sex-trafficking

The government prosecutors showed that she recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse of teenage girls, helping Epstein bring victims to locations where the abuse occurred.


Posted by SNAP
Member since Nov 2025
245 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

This is why those files should never have been released. Files emails without context do nothing but cause more conspiracy theories for Qtard types. I trust the fbi and Kash over some loon on the internet.

Massey has destroyed this country


Alarmingly stupid.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

This admin isn't going to give you 'actual evidence.


OK so what evidence are you using to base your claims on, exactly? Just implications and assumptions?

When you go to the "they're hiding all the evidence" it means taking any position becomes rather difficult, as that knife cuts in every direction.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

he didn't traffick them to those rich men. He just let them use them.


Who is "them" and what evidence are you relying on to name them?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476648 posts
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

Did you forget Ghislaine Maxwell is in federal prison primarily for her role in sex trafficking and grooming underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse network.

For Epstein. Not a "sexual abuse network".

Just Epstein

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram