- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Family, Friends Of Dead Home Invaders Say “They Didn’t Deserve To Get Killed.”
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:28 am to SavageOrangeJug
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:28 am to SavageOrangeJug
Sure did. As well as both links in the article.
1
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:30 am to SavageOrangeJug
It's true, they didn't "deserve" to die.
But they made a bad choice; a choice that carried a risk.
I'm sorry but if I have a gun, and somebody has broken into my house (that contains my wife and 2 children), I'm going to kill you if I can and not think twice about it.
But they made a bad choice; a choice that carried a risk.
I'm sorry but if I have a gun, and somebody has broken into my house (that contains my wife and 2 children), I'm going to kill you if I can and not think twice about it.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:31 am to a want
Yep.
You said it better than I did.
You said it better than I did.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:32 am to FT
I've got my wife and a 7 month old at home, stranger's come in and I'm supposed to consider their lives over my familys?
That's just strange thinking IMO, they made a huge mistake and to protect my family it will be a deadly mistake on their part
That's just strange thinking IMO, they made a huge mistake and to protect my family it will be a deadly mistake on their part
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 7:34 am
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:33 am to Homesick Tiger
The wife received a phone call from a friend yesterday evening. The friend was shocked to hear and see on the news that someone had been killed in our old residence. It was an elderly lady that had been killed. You never know the intent of the intruder.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:52 am to SavageOrangeJug
Not opening link, but is this the guy who baited the teenagers in and then killed them off one at a time?
If so, they def didn't deserve to be killed, the guy knew they weren't any threat. That piece of shite deserves the chair.
If so, they def didn't deserve to be killed, the guy knew they weren't any threat. That piece of shite deserves the chair.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 7:53 am to Lsut81
quote:
Not opening link, but is this the guy who baited the teenagers in and then killed them off one at a time?
If so, they def didn't deserve to be killed, the guy knew they weren't any threat. That piece of shite deserves the chair.
No. Different story.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:20 am to SavageOrangeJug
When the youths decided to beat down the doors of a dwelling containing humans residing in it they voluntarily stepped over the line from burgalers to that of threats to bodily harm of the people in that home. So they were well past deserving of being shot and ending up DEAD given they set up the circumstances for shots to be fired upon.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:21 am to SavageOrangeJug
All those stupid fricking kids crying.
He was trying to eat
He was trying to eat
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:22 am to FT
quote:
Meh, I'm all in favor of being able to defend your home from invaders (can't believe I even had to type that out), but they probably didn't "deserve to die". Home invasion shouldn't be a capital offense.
Deserve has nothing to do with it. You do something dumb like breaking into somebody's home, well then you take your chances.
It's probably good they eliminated themselves from the gene pool before they could breed.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:25 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
So, you should sit back and hope the home invaders don't kill you, "because they don't deserve to die."
After you are dead and gone, the same scumbags who are expressing sympathy now will be moaning about a malfunctioning execution procedure.
Kill them now and save the taxpayers some money and clean the gene pool.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:34 am to SavageOrangeJug
I'm not really going to look to the statements of 13-15 year old girls as the basis for proving a point.
No adult said they didn't deserve to die, and I don't know why we're discussing the statements of emotional juveniles.
No adult said they didn't deserve to die, and I don't know why we're discussing the statements of emotional juveniles.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:34 am to constant cough
For those who think that they didnt deserve to die. Please explain to me by what right did the perpetrators have to break into someones home. What form of entitlement do the perpetrators have to take things which are not theirs. When someone breaks into a home which is occupied, the occupants have the right to assume that the entruders are armed and or mean them bodily harm and therefore have a right to defend themself by any means at their disposal. The parents of the perpatrators have only themselves to blame since they failed to teach their children the differnce between right and wrong, period. Im sick of criminals who feel entitled to steal. We only hear of the criminals who were shot or killed in the act of committing a crime. Oh they didnt deserve to die. what about the homeowner or store owner who die at the hands of these animals. We never hear about those situations and have outrage against the criminals.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:22 am to TIGA 80
They didn't have a right to break into someone's home. I've already said that the owner had the right to shoot. That's different from saying that they deserve to die. We're probably splitting hairs at this point.
The point I'm making is simply that it's difficult to say that they deserved to die and never be able to recover from making this ridiculous, stupid decision. At the time of the break in, shooting them made sense and was justified. That still doesn't mean that they deserved to die. It means that the home owner couldn't have known what they were planning to do and protected himself.
If they'd gotten away and been sentenced to juvenile detention until they turned 21, none of us would be pushing for the death penalty.
Is this point of view that hard to understand?
The point I'm making is simply that it's difficult to say that they deserved to die and never be able to recover from making this ridiculous, stupid decision. At the time of the break in, shooting them made sense and was justified. That still doesn't mean that they deserved to die. It means that the home owner couldn't have known what they were planning to do and protected himself.
If they'd gotten away and been sentenced to juvenile detention until they turned 21, none of us would be pushing for the death penalty.
Is this point of view that hard to understand?
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:28 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
It is getting really old that we hear this every time some punk thug gets his due. The fact they were young makes no difference.
In spite of it getting so old, its good to see you can find the energy to beat up on the illogic of statements from a family that just lost two children. Good job! You're awesome! Go tell em! You should take it to the next level and send them a letter telling them how happy you are that their boys are dead and ask for the grave location so you can piss on it.
The loss of life - while legal and justified - is tragic either way. If you can't see that you're fricked in the head.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 9:30 am
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:32 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
“Justice was served,” said Robert Robinson.
/thread
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:42 am to SavageOrangeJug
Nice pic of the 16 year old flashing gang signs. Clearly an innocent young man who was simply misunderstood.
Better comment from one of the friends of the 14 year old is that he broke into the home "Probably to get something to eat."
Double
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Better comment from one of the friends of the 14 year old is that he broke into the home "Probably to get something to eat."
Double
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 9:45 am
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:43 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
In spite of it getting so old, its good to see you can find the energy to beat up on the illogic of statements from a family that just lost two children. Good job! You're awesome! Go tell em! You should take it to the next level and send them a letter telling them how happy you are that their boys are dead and ask for the grave location so you can piss on it.
The loss of life - while legal and justified - is tragic either way. If you can't see that you're fricked in the head.
Nothing tragic about a criminal thug getting their career cut short.
If you or the families of these thug little bastards can't see that they died as direct result of their own criminal acts, then you are the one that is fricked in the head.
The families should be forced to apologize to the elderly couple since it is their little thug pieces of shite that have turned these old people's lives upside down.
Protesting in front of the old couple's home like they were at fault? Disgusting pieces of shite should have raised the punks a little better.
Your sympathies seem to be with the thugs and not the victims. Did you have a relative get their arse capped during the commission of a crime?
Do you think this elderly couple wanted to kill these punks? HELL NO! They wanted to be left alone to live their lives. These worthless little bastards repeatedly broke into their home.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:54 am to FT
First of all, its sad that these young people werent raised in a way that would have given them better decision making skills. I wouldnt shoot to kill unless my life was in danger. An elderly woman probably did think her life was in danger.
The question shouldnt be "did they deserve to die?" We all die, some tragically at a young age, some not. The question should be "did they deserve to live?"
Is is to be assumed that these teenagers were going to have been a positive presence in the community for the rest of their lives. At this point, no.
The question shouldnt be "did they deserve to die?" We all die, some tragically at a young age, some not. The question should be "did they deserve to live?"
Is is to be assumed that these teenagers were going to have been a positive presence in the community for the rest of their lives. At this point, no.
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:57 am to bamafan1001
You're only entitled to live if you are a
?
quote:
positive presence in the community for the rest of their lives
?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News