- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:53 am to DisplacedBuckeye
I know you lack reading comprehension skills because you are so emotional like a woman but to clarify he said the good responses should be considered for promotion. In other words, the people who showed they get shite done and the shite they got done can be verified.
Not just getting promoted because they responded on a Saturday as you tried to claim.
Not just getting promoted because they responded on a Saturday as you tried to claim.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:54 am to HeavyD
quote:
Don’t know why there is a. Issue with this. I have to give weekly status reports. Been like that for 20 years. What we did, what’s on for next week and any issues. Standard working procedures.
I think the issue is that status reports tend to be for your direct supervisor who knows your work, not someone several echelons away from your work who is expressly just looking for convenient ways to terminate people.
Everything Elon is doing is what executives/owners of a large business do to avoid doing mass layoffs for labor protection reasons. This isn't about increasing knowledge, it is about finding some minor violation of instructions - possibly out of the employee's control - to be able to fire with cause on mass without it being legally a layoff.
DOGE's problem is a bit different. Many of the non-spoils game employees cannot just be fired without cause. They've tried to offer a severance package but people aren't biting on it like they hoped. So they cut probationary period employees because they don't have to give cause. However it still isn't hitting their desired effect. So now they're just going to do a constant stream of new requirements and such to see who misses the email or whatever then fire them for cause individually.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:56 am to jclem11
quote:
I have some beachfront property in Arizona to sell you.
Sounds to me you're the bozo for buying beachfront property in AZ when there are no beaches. Guy that sold it to you must have seen you coming a mile away.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 8:58 am to stout
quote:
to clarify he said the good responses should be considered for promotion
You know we don't have to guess, right?
Here's exactly what he said:
quote:
A large number of good responses have been received already. These are the people who should be considered for promotion.
I mean...
quote:
I know you lack reading comprehension skills because you are so emotional like a woman
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:00 am to METAL
quote:
Wonder how they handle people out for a while for vacation, sick leave, medical leave, etc.
Wow what a quandary. Talk about an insurmountable problem.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:00 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
A large number of good responses have been received already. These are the people who should be considered for promotion.
As I said, he clearly stated good responses. Not just that they responded.
I am sorry that you don't read so well.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:00 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
One caveat: we won't catch all the dead/fictitious employees. Whoever set those employees accounts up (and, most likely, illegally pocketing the paycheck) will just log into the email account, make up 5 BS bullet points and hit "Send". But, we'll catch some.
I bet there is another plan in the works.
I wonder if he has a program to detect AI responses to the email.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 9:05 am
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:01 am to stout
FFS, here:
See above.
quote:
A large number of good responses have been received ALREADY. These are the people who should be considered for promotion.
quote:
I am sorry that you don't read so well.
See above.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:04 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:
My guess is they end up trying to terminate people on FMLA leave, PTO w/ no internet connectivity, or folks with non-standard schedules who will not be able to access their email on a government workstation until after the deadline.
Or, and hear me out on this, they escalate the non-responders to another level and verify those that were on leave.
Why are people so obsessed with the intricacies of this?
“But what if they are sick?”
Good grief
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:04 am to DisplacedBuckeye
So, IYO, do you think he is simply stating that those who responded should be promoted and the should be promoted part has nothing to do with the part where he says good responses?
Aren't you supposed to be some outstanding businessman who sold his company for millions and retired?
Aren't you supposed to be some outstanding businessman who sold his company for millions and retired?
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:04 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
still on the posting bender
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:04 am to AGGIES
quote:
Sorta feels like just the beginning of series of more “tests” for employees to keep their jobs.
Good
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:07 am to stout
quote:
So, IYO, do you think he is simply stating that those who responded should be promoted and the should be promoted part has nothing to do with the part where he says good responses?
He very clearly pointed to people who replied "already." On a Saturday.
This isn’t difficult.
quote:
Aren't you supposed to be some outstanding businessman who sold his company for millions and retired?
I never claimed that I was an outstanding businessman.
Does that bother you?
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:08 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:
I think the issue is that status reports tend to be for your direct supervisor who knows your work, not someone several echelons away
Did you miss the “cc your supervisor” part of the email?
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:09 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
He very clearly pointed to people who replied "already." On a Saturday.
You are retarded
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:09 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
RohanGonzales
Why do you spend so much time following me around? Did I frick your mom or something?
I'm not your dad. Move on.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:10 am to stout
quote:
You are retarded
Says the retard who doesn't know what "already" means.
Posted on 2/23/25 at 9:12 am to jclem11
quote:
Why is a board of self-proclaimed pious religious men hanging on the every word of a degenerate deadbeat dad with 13 children by 4 women who does not take care of his children? You are all hypocrites and the sycophantic worship is frickin embarrassing. The irony of this board's gods being two degenerate immoral men is frickin hilarious.
This is simple lashing out at things going on that you don’t like.
Sad.
Popular
Back to top



2






