- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Economist Peter schiff with a weird statement
Posted on 6/6/25 at 10:59 am to Grumpy Nemesis
Posted on 6/6/25 at 10:59 am to Grumpy Nemesis
I’m not saying that one is lesser than the other, you are. Both are very much illegal for a reason.
Reading the tea leaves here, seems like maybe you are attracted to 15 year olds? If so, please do yourself a favor and suck start a shotgun
Reading the tea leaves here, seems like maybe you are attracted to 15 year olds? If so, please do yourself a favor and suck start a shotgun
1
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:00 am to Fells
quote:
If you don't think that a grown adult fricking a 15 year old is abhorrent, you got some fricking problems.
How is it possible that so many of you can't comprehend that saying something is worse than another thing doesn't mean the other thing is good. This is basic shite man
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:00 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
I understand it perfectly well. For some reason your simplistic brain can't comprehend but saying one thing is worse than another does not mean the other thing is good. I mean murder is worse than robbery but that doesn't mean I think robbery is okay. Hell murder is worse than assault but that doesn't mean I think assault is okay. I'm sorry your brain lacks this capacity. I can't help you there
Or, hear me out, being attracted to children of any age can be equally terrible.
But please continue to vouch for Epstein!
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:01 am to cas4t
quote:
Reading the tea leaves here, seems like maybe you are attracted to 15 year olds? If so, please do yourself a favor and suck start a shotgun
You simple-minded fricks are so silly. You all come out with the same argument every time. Oh you must like 15-year-olds!!
No I'm just not stupid. If you want to Revel in your stupidity have at it. But you're not going to shame me with your stupidity. It don't work that way
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:01 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
How is it possible that so many of you can't comprehend that saying something is worse than another thing doesn't mean the other thing is good.
Apparently for the same reason you can't comprehend that a 50 year old dude diddling a 15 year old is JUST AS BAD as a 50 year old diddling a 5 year old.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:02 am to cas4t
quote:
Or, hear me out, being attracted to children of any age can be equally terrible
No
Not even close
And none of you even really believe this shite. I guarantee you that if you found out your neighbor was fricking with toddlers your brain would melt right through your ears you would be so angry. And Beyond angry it would be beyond your ability to even comprehend how somebody could do that. I know that's how my reaction would be. Like what the frick are they even seeing?
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:03 am to MemphisGuy
quote:because that's completely fricking irrational. I mean I will happily put both of them in jail and they will deserve it. But no they are not equally bad
Apparently for the same reason you can't comprehend that a 50 year old dude diddling a 15 year old is JUST AS BAD as a 50 year old diddling a 5 year old.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:03 am to Grumpy Nemesis
There is a comedian who has a bit about the difference between pedophiles and ephebophile but it's impossible to explain the difference without sounding like a pedophile. I'm just scared to do a Google search to find it.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:03 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Just apply the half your age plus 7 rule and you should be fine.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:04 am to Alabama Slim
quote:
There is a comedian who has a bit about the difference between pedophiles and ephebophile but it's impossible to explain the difference without sounding like a pedophile. I'm just scared to do a Google search to find it
I know the bit. That dude's fricking hilarious and that bit is fricking hilarious. Comedy is awesome. But hope to God we don't set policy based on comedy
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:04 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
And none of you even really believe this shite. I guarantee you that if you found out your neighbor was fricking with toddlers your brain would melt right through your ears you would be so angry. And Beyond angry it would be beyond your ability to even comprehend how somebody could do that. I know that's how my reaction would be. Like what the frick are they even seeing?
It would be the same if I found out my neighbor was fricking 13 year olds as well. This isn't that hard, dude.
You seem to think we are saying that fricking a 5 year old isn't bad. We are saying that fricking a 15 year old is just as bad if you are a grown as man. And it is.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:04 am to Grumpy Nemesis
Ah just resorting to calling everyone stupid. I bet you got a full ride for the debate team.
Should I respond with “I know you are, but what am I?”
Sorry, you being adamant on this topic is alarming.
Should I respond with “I know you are, but what am I?”
Sorry, you being adamant on this topic is alarming.
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 11:05 am
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:05 am to Grumpy Nemesis
Bruh you said that the idea that both are so far over the line that severity doesn't matter is lunacy. Obviously you don't agree that one of them is very far over the line, which means your perception of how serious this shite is is incredibly off.
You don't get a pass for saying both are bad when you are minimizing the severity of an abhorrent action for dumb, pedantic reasons.
You don't get a pass for saying both are bad when you are minimizing the severity of an abhorrent action for dumb, pedantic reasons.
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 11:06 am
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:05 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
But no they are not equally bad
Yes, they are.
Grumpy about right now...
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:06 am to GumboPot
quote:
Just apply the half your age plus 7 rule and you should be fine.
My wife was 23 when I married her and I was 38. I made it LOL
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:06 am to cas4t
quote:
Ah just resorting to calling everyone stupid. I bet you got a full ride for the debate team
If you make stupid arguments then the only thing that can be said is they are stupid
I'm not trying to debate with irrational
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:07 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
And none of you even really believe this shite. I guarantee you that if you found out your neighbor was fricking with toddlers your brain would melt right through your ears you would be so angry. And Beyond angry it would be beyond your ability to even comprehend how somebody could do that. I know that's how my reaction would be. Like what the frick are they even seeing?
I would have the exact same response to a 5 year old as I would a 13 year old. Both. Are. Children.
Are you implying a 13 year is, idk, more capable of consenting to sex with a 40 year old man? Otherwise I don’t see your point.
One can gross you out more than the other. That doesn’t make it any less worse than the other, and certainly doesn’t mean others have to adhere to your opinion.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:07 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
But no they are not equally bad
What a strange take. They are both disgusting and against the law.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:07 am to Fells
quote:
You don't get a pass for saying both are bad when you are minimizing the severity of an abhorrent action for dumb, pedantic reasons
If I said murdering five people is far worse than murdering one would you claim that I was minimizing individual murder? Stop it already
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:08 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Peter Schiff #1 Tweet:
"I'm not defending Epstein. But he had sex with teenage girls, 14-17 that had physically developed sexually. They were underage, so criminal and immoral,. but that does not make him a pedophile."
Schiff rationalizes: Yeah, but "phyiscally developed sexually" BUT leaves out the unsaid part -- "may still be a child mentally and emotionally."
And yeah, Schiff actually IS defending Epstein and justifying under-age Shiksa marauding with impunity.
"I'm not defending Epstein. But he had sex with teenage girls, 14-17 that had physically developed sexually. They were underage, so criminal and immoral,. but that does not make him a pedophile."
Schiff rationalizes: Yeah, but "phyiscally developed sexually" BUT leaves out the unsaid part -- "may still be a child mentally and emotionally."
And yeah, Schiff actually IS defending Epstein and justifying under-age Shiksa marauding with impunity.
Page 5 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News