- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Due process' was stripped from illegals by President Clinton & Congress in the 1990s
Posted on 5/7/25 at 9:31 am to LSUconvert
Posted on 5/7/25 at 9:31 am to LSUconvert
quote:
The entitlement is insane. Find it yourself
Impossible. It doesn’t exist. Which is the point. Your hypocrisy knows no bounds. You couldn’t care less about the constitution…all you know is OMB. Your inability to link us to a single criticism proves it.
1
Posted on 5/7/25 at 9:43 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Impossible. It doesn’t exist
You'd have to look to find this out.
We both know you're far too lazy.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:39 am to troyt37
quote:
The burden has never been on the government to prove you aren’t legal.
No it very much initially is. The burden is on the government to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person is subject to removal under a section of the INA. Once they meet that burden it then shifts to the person to prove to varying levels depending on type of relief that they have a basis to stay in the US.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:47 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
why the President of that country said it was because the US is paying him.
When did the President of El Salvador say that?
quote:
but I would like to know why we are paying to incarcerate people in another country.
We are paying El Salvador to house Venezuelans because the government of Venezuela will not allow the U.S. to deport Venezuelan citizens to Venezuela.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:59 am to lionward2014
quote:
No it very much initially is. The burden is on the government to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person is subject to removal under a section of the INA. Once they meet that burden it then shifts to the person to prove to varying levels depending on type of relief that they have a basis to stay in the US.
The clear and convincing standard is for people that entered the U.S. legally. The government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the person has done something to meet the standard of deportability.
For persons trying to enter, the burden is on that person.
For persons present in the U.S. that did not enter legally all the government must show is that the person is foreign born, then the burden shifts to the person. The legal theory being that it is a situation where the person is trying to enter.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 11:37 am to JimEverett
quote:
For persons present in the U.S. that did not enter legally all the government must show is that the person is foreign born, then the burden shifts to the person
Fair enough rebuttable. The government still technically has first burden, proving alienage, but it typically is an extremely simple burden to meet.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 7:52 pm to cajunangelle
Listen to this rogue activist judge who didn't follow the Constitution.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 9:03 pm to Bunk Moreland
I've literally quoted cases he authored confirming this 
Posted on 5/7/25 at 9:54 pm to cajunangelle
America picked the slimy Clinton when they could have chosen Ross Perot.
Posted on 5/7/25 at 10:32 pm to bhtigerfan
You telling me that Judge Jamal is wrong?
That’s RACIST
That’s RACIST
Posted on 5/8/25 at 6:38 am to Bunk Moreland
Was Scalia and RBG referring to asylum seeker refugees, those that apply legally?
Back when Scalia was of this earth, we didn't have purposeful destabilization with an open border. Haitians weren't flown in overnight to disrupt very small towns.
Back when Scalia was of this earth, we didn't have purposeful destabilization with an open border. Haitians weren't flown in overnight to disrupt very small towns.
Posted on 5/8/25 at 7:03 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Was Scalia and RBG referring to asylum seeker refugees, those that apply legally?
Clearly not
*ETA: I took your question to mean was he exclusively referring to them. He clearly says ANYONE within our border, which is what me and a couple others keep telling y'all has been the rules for forever.
This post was edited on 5/8/25 at 7:06 am
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News