- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Don Jr is tweeting about Hunter
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:05 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:05 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
That does not make it relevant to or admissible in the impeachment proceedings
You know that's stupid and it's tiresome. The Democrats made it relevant by saying that the only reason Trump did it what's for political reasons. By definition this makes seeking testimony to test the validity of that assertion relevant
You are being retarded in this thread and it's embarrassing even for you
0
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:06 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
I’ve asked the same thing several times. No one ever answers the question.
I answered It above.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:06 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:1. Someone accuses me of not advocating for limited government.
Instead of trying to prove the negative, i’ll just fall back to your post history on a myriad of other issues.
2. I ask that he show even one instance in which I acted otherwise.
3. You think that is asking for proof of a negative. (Pro Tip, it is not)
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:07 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
1. Someone accuses me of not advocating for limited government.
2. I ask that he show even one instance in which I acted otherwise
Simple. Roughly 97% of all of your posts are indistinguishable in position from those taken by CNN MSNBC Nancy pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
The fact that you avoid showing your colors in any other way does not mitigate the above reality from being true.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:09 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
That does not make it relevant to or admissible in the impeachment proceedings.
It absolutely does Judge Proggy. Trump’s motivations don’t matter regardless. This is a liberal fantasy. However, Biden’s involvement in a pay for play scandal, which could be clarified in testimony, would erase the dem’s dumb talking points forever.
quote:
And it does not forgive a politically-motivated prosecution
Are you fricking serious?
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:10 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:This is too dumb to merit much of a request.
“Check my post history” appeals are as big a liberal white flag as “both sides do it” posts.
If the generic “you” accuses me of taking a given position, it is neither “liberal” nor “conservative” to ask that you show where I did so.
It is simply calling “you” out on a blatant lie by seeking proof of your assertion.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:10 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
3. You think that is asking for proof of a negative. (Pro Tip, it is not)
If I spent all of my time on this board restating the general position of leading Republicans every time I posted but actively avoided taking a position on any specific political issues you wouldn't be so retarded as to think that this was a coincidence
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If the generic “you” accuses me of taking a given position,
Except no one actually does this. We all see what you're doing. You don't take any actual positions on political issues with pretty rare exception
You are the resident thread derailleur and thread steerer. And you're transparent as fricking hell
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:12 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Some of which bears no relationship to any Congressional investigation. And some of which falls under the “abuse” category that I described above.
Laundering paid campaign smear into “intelligence”, unmasking Americans, lying to FISA judges to secure warrants, and leaking classified material to the press isn’t “pursuant to constitutional and statutory authority” you fricking nerd.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:14 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Keep this in mind the next time you feel the need to give me grief about a Siri dictation error.
you're in tire shtick i
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:16 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Keep this in mind the next time you feel the need to give me grief about a Siri dictation error
You must be referring to someone else. I laugh every time I see an obvious dictation error because I have so many of them myself.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Keep this in mind the next time you feel the need to give me grief about a Siri dictation error
And frick Siri. I don't use Apple. My errors are Android!!!
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:It’s cute you think it’s just one thing.
1. Someone accuses me of not advocating for limited government.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:18 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
What US law did Baby Biden violate?
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:18 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Yet you cannot link even one ... single ... solitary ... post which would demonstrate support for Big Government.
Roughly 97% of all of your posts are indistinguishable in position from those taken by CNN MSNBC Nancy pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
Odd.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:20 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
That does not make it relevant to or admissible in the impeachment proceedings.
Da Fuq? Investigating crime isn’t relevant to an impeachment based on a request to investigate a crime? K. quote:Apply this standard universally. I bet you don’t see how this statement exposes you.
And it does not forgive a politically-motivated prosecution, if such took place.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:21 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Like Bama officiating.
Yet invariably they are always reasonable in the same direction. And we are all supposed to just not notice
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:22 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Yet you cannot link even one ... single ... solitary ... post which would demonstrate support for Big Government
It isn't odd at all.
You specifically avoid taking actual positions
This doesn't change the fact that every time you are posting your words line up perfectly with CNN MSNBC Nancy pelosi and Chuck Schumer
You act like you invented this approach. Trust me you didn't
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:23 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
And it does not forgive a politically-motivated prosecution, if such took place
Isn't this shite great
Accuse somebody of a politically-motivated prosecution. Ignore any possible evidence that it wasn't politically motivated. While simultaneously having no actual proof that it was politically motivated
There's liberal Hank for ya
Posted on 1/18/20 at 5:27 pm to CDawson
quote:
None beside skirting child support and tax law that I know of.
And crack and hookers.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News