- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Don Jr is tweeting about Hunter
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:26 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:26 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
The trouble we’re seeing is the Prog/Dim leftists think conservative Americans are as ignorant as their clueless constituents......sorry Dims, we’re not easily bamboozled.
0
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:26 pm to AggieHank86
At first glance, bribery is a pretty clear charge.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:28 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Shorty, I made passing reference to something that people had been discussing for a year, and ... no ... I did not cite the ultimate source for a throwaway comment.
Good Lord. To do realize the thread still exists, right.
LOL
quote:
From that, you have constructed a house of cards with a tinfoil roof.
Yeah yeah
It's not you. It's EVERYONE ELSE
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:30 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Of course I do. And anyone who reads to entire thread objectively would see that you are making outrageous leaps of logic. But I do not really expect that from anyone here.
Good Lord. To do realize the thread still exists, right.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:31 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
did not cite the ultimate source for a throwaway comment.
When called in it, you defended a dude with Maddow and Lemon level TDS as "credible"
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:32 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Of course I do. And anyone who reads to entire thread objectively would see that you are making outrageous leaps of logic
Actually. Everyone in that thread Saw exactly what you were
Oh. That's right. It's not you. It's everyone else
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:32 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
My man!
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:35 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
What US law did Baby Biden violate?
That's what we need to find out...remember according to you libs it's not the nature of the evidence, it's the seriousness of the charge.
Actually though, I highly suspect Hunter didn't claim the monies on his taxes and furthermore, while being just an intermediary to collect corrupt money for political influence might not be as high up on the ring of felonies...his Pops damn sure needs to be investigated to see what influence they were buying from him.
You know this is bullshite. How would you feel if all the other SEC teams were using proxies to wide open pay players but aTm was playing by the rules...if you had knowledge of this you'd be busting down the NCAA doors wanting action taken against the whole lot of teams, players, and their shill proxies. This is on a much higher plane than football games bro.
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:36 pm to Strannix
quote:
He’s right you know
Conservatives need to quit letting the Dims control the messaging. I realize it’s difficult due to the DimMedia’s relentless dedication to destroy Trump but as individuals we need to take every opportunity to push back and inform other citizens of the Prog/Dim frickery.....channel your inner Hannity....lol!
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:39 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I am an advocate of small, very-limited government.
What up, Hank. Got a question for you. As it appears obvious that there simply will not be evidence of Trump's own true, personal, inner intentions (an indispensable element of the abuse of power article), how is it not severe government overreach to continue down this road, in the face of that seemingly impossible task of proving intent??
I do get that when you refer to advocating for small government that it is more aimed at govt regulation, etc etc. However, we do have in this situation heavy government intervention, and with a very apparent unlikelihood of achieving the ultimate goal. It's one thing to just run with only the record composed in the House, and judge only that. But to continue to utilize government in a huge way for the purpose of an unspecific fishing expedition, again basically zero potential for proving intent, how are you not highly displeased at this continued fruitless govt effort/intervention??
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:40 pm to cokebottleag
quote:Who did Baby Biden bribe?
At first glance, bribery is a pretty clear charge.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:52 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Had this request gone through law enforcement channels
I don’t know how much more official you can get than a request from one nations’s chief law enforcement officer to another.
Where in the COTUS does any Federal law enforcement agency, any ambassador, any diplomat, or fricking Interpol have more authority than the President? HE EFFECTUATES AND ENFORCES OUR LAWS AND SETS FOREIGN POLICY. None of those either entities have that authority WITHOUT him.
The suggestion that it is in any way improper for the President of the United States to investigate potential graft and corruption of any member of the Executive Branch (Eg the Vice Potus while acting under color of US law); is fricking insane and a Democrat invention. Again. I hope this is investigated by the DOJ AND the Ukrainian Equivalent.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:55 pm to davyjones
quote:Are you talking about impeachment, Mueller, or what? I have said from the beginning that the entire impeachment process is a ridiculous waste of time, money and resources.
What up, Hank. Got a question for you.
While I wait for your response, a general observation.
On this forum, people tend to have trouble grasping the difference between a political philosophy (what government SHOULD do) and an objective analysis of current events. How many times do we see some snarky comment to the effect of “How could a libertarian make that analysis?”
A libertarian can recognize that government (in its current form) DOES have power “X,” even if he does not believe that government SHOULD have that power. And (if he has an IQ above that of a turnip), he can analyze the situation based upon reality, rather than his utopian ideal.
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
objective analysis of current events
ROFLMAO
I can predict your view on ANYTHING Trump does with 90% reliability just by checking to see what Pelosi and CNN think
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:57 pm to AggieHank86
Don't be a fricking martyr.
That blows your cover.
That blows your cover.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:58 pm to AggieHank86
Hero Hank white knighting for Hunter never thought I would see that 
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Who did Baby Biden bribe?
Biden ACCEPTED one. Potentially (and I think presumably) on behalf of his shady, stupid, father.
Said bribe, was payable in installments of $50k to $89k per month (depending on the published source), by a proxy for a foreign state actor. Said bribe was paid to influence US policy maker (VP Biden) to either enrich himself, or to save him from having to bail out his craxkhead son forever. Said payments were made to leverage US power against a foreign state government to pressure it into refusing to prosecute said proxy.
It was made to BUY disloyalty to the US and its citizens. And that’s just what we know from published news reports.
Even MORE disgusting is that this bribe was made with OUR money.
It’s fricking GROSS. And infuriating.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 2:06 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Are you talking about impeachment, Mueller, or what?
Impeachment. But more specifically ongoing efforts to search for supporting evidence, despite the obvious unavailability of that indispensable evidence. I'm proposing that there's alternate objectives at this stage, and our government is being utilized to illegitimately achieve those objectives. I say we go with what we've got, get on with it and cease any further govt overreach.
quote:
On this forum, people tend to have trouble grasping the difference between a political philosophy (what government SHOULD do) and an objective analysis of current events
Exactly my point. Here appears to be a situation wherein political philosophy and current events smash into each other head on.
And you may not have meant me, but of course no snark intended here.
ETA....and I do note your response about impeachment, just wanted to clarify my original point.
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 2:10 pm to davyjones
Even Rand Paul, one to not throw things out there without evidence, said publicly the Biden's are corrupt as hell.
I was surprised it was Rand that said it.
I was surprised it was Rand that said it.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 2:10 pm to Wednesday
Baby Biden was offered and accepted a position for which he had no apparent qualifications. I doubt that any sane individual thinks this was done for any reason other than a hope that it would garner favor with his father and/or a hope that his name would provide the company with same cachet.
Accepting that position simply does not violate the FCPA, which was the assertion to which I responded.
The “smell test” regarding this conversation is pretty simple.
Accepting that position simply does not violate the FCPA, which was the assertion to which I responded.
The “smell test” regarding this conversation is pretty simple.
quote:I do not think he makes that call. If you are being honest, I doubt that you believe he would do so, either.
If the media were screaming that Charlotte Pence would not have gotten her book deal with a foreign-owned publisher if her father were not VP and that her royalties were a hidden bribe to her father, would Trump have made the same telephone calal to the head of state of that foreign nation?
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 2:42 pm
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News