- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DOJ seeks to question FBI officials tied to search of Trump Mar-a-Lago estate
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:14 am
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:14 am
LINK
quote:
The U.S. Justice Department has requested to interview FBI officials who were involved in the 2022 search of Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in ?Florida as part of a wide-ranging probe examining past investigations of the president, four sources ?familiar with the matter said on Thursday.
The requests came from investigators working with Joe diGenova, a Trump ally who began overseeing ?the Florida-based investigation earlier this year. The investigation has been seeking to establish that Trump was the victim of a criminal conspiracy against his rights.
The questioning over the Mar-a-Lago search, which was first reported by the Associated Press, is an indication the probe is examining a range of prior government investigations into Trump's ?conduct.
Spokespeople for the Justice Department and ?FBI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:18 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
If we had a functioning government they would have already been tried by a military tribunal, a fair and impartial panel.
I would give them a choice, firing squad or rope.
I would give them a choice, firing squad or rope.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:40 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
The investigation has been seeking to establish that Trump was the victim of a criminal conspiracy against his rights.
This is awful journalism. Investigations don’t seek to establish a crime. That wording places blame of the crime on the investigation.
How about: “The investigation seeks to determine if Trump was the targeted victim of a crime al- by a weaponized FBI with the intent to remove an opposition candidate from an election”.
This post was edited on 8/21/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 8/21/26 at 8:46 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
The requests came from investigators working with Joe diGenova, a Trump ally who began overseeing ?the Florida-based investigation earlier this year.
I don't recall seeing this come out in public earlier this year.
Glad to see it the raid and those behind it being investigated. If this was a necessary raid, why was the media tipped off? FFS he was a former President, not a hardened violent criminal that necessitated these actions.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 9:26 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
How about not “seek” and just do?
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:15 am to Strannix
quote:
If we had a functioning government they would have already been tried by a military tribunal, a fair and impartial panel.
I would give them a choice, firing squad or rope.
No if we had a functioning government the current DOJ would be forced to function as intended, and not a tool for the president to attack people he dosen't like.
Posted on 8/21/26 at 10:27 am to The1TrueTiger
quote:
No if we had a functioning government the current DOJ would be forced to function as intended, and not a tool for the president to attack people he dosen't like.
A person being disliked doesn't disqualify them from being a criminal!
Come on baw, you can do better than that! Or maybe not.....
Popular
Back to top

4









