Started By
Message

re: DOJ Indicts Doctor Who Exposed the Barbarism of “Gender-Affirming Care”

Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44324 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Not denouncing “gender affirming care,” aka child abuse, is tacit approval. You do you though.


Still won’t denounce it huh?

Go figure…
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38426 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

If you have a problem with that, take it up with Congress in the 90s when they passed it.


Final Rules were not adopted until early 2000s. Went into effect April, 2003. All penalties at that time were civil. Only later did they make them criminal and it required profit from the release of PHI. How did he profit from such information? You didn't answer it the other way I asked it. Insurance Portability was Title 1 which went into effect in the late 1990s.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

How did he profit from such information?


How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!

Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90774 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:34 pm to
How do we know you swallow?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38426 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!

It's cute that you think he will get anything in the way of a fair trial from the feds.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15718 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!


How do we know the prosecutor isn’t a far-left extremist that supports child genital mutilation?
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44324 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:45 pm to
Are you going to denounce “gender affirming care?”
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16880 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Good thing we'll have a trial to see IF he violated any laws!


quote:

The resident violated federal law.


Oh my
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15718 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Are you going to denounce “gender affirming care?”


No she will not because she supports it. Her support of child genital mutilation is why she supports going after the person who exposed it.

Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!



How do we know you are a depraved butcher who supports the genital mutilation and chemical castration of children and adolescents?



We simply read this thread.

This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 4:51 pm
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55454 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 4:02 pm to
I violated my own rule and replied to the OP.

Everyone here could do better by not replying to threads where groomers are spiking the football.

Again, you can't reason with people who support pedophiles, child mutilation, and jailing opposition to it.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 4:23 pm to
quote:



Again, you can't reason with people who support pedophiles, child mutilation, and jailing opposition to it.


I take the opposite tack. Though I certainly am not operating from the delusion that these reprobates are here for an honest discussion, threads such as this should be bumped to demonstrate what these bloodthirsty ghouls actually support.

This entire “trans” agenda is not only an assault against science and reason, it is further evidence that the primary tenets of progressive ideology are increasingly centered in child sacrifice and thus aligned with demonic forces from the lower bowels of Hell. There really is no better way to describe it.



This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 4:25 pm
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2991 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

The original article mentions that the clinic saw multiple patients with specific treatments "on the same day last week," which would indicate that dates and individual patient details were released. Even if you remove the names and things like MRNs and phone numbers, you're still in violation.


I can’t read the original article, I’m not seeing it.

That said, the threshold for HIPPAA on dates is admit/discharge dates, not so much on total time of stay.

It gets fuzzier after that. If the resident gave a specific date treatments happened, then he might have an issue.

If he just said “on the same day last week”, then proving a violation gets tougher because it’s more generalized.

I get why you’re passionate about this, for whatever weird reason you’re upset that he blew the whistle after the hospital publicly said they were stopping that kind of treatment.

You do you, but for kids sake I’m glad he blew the whistle.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

I’m glad he blew the whistle.


You got that right.

As indicated by 808 above, HIPAA provisions allow doctors to release patient data that is not legally identifiable if it furthers legitimate statistical and scientific inquiries.

Yet even here, getting lost in the weeds over whether this doctor violated patient privacy laws ignores the main moral issue at play here.

The main issue that should be at the forefront of this discussion is a doctor’s duty to fulfill the Hippocratic Oath.

The Hippocratic Oath can be redacted into two main precepts: the primary tenet of the Hippocratic Oath is 1.) Do No Harm… while a secondary tent is 2.) Respect the patient’s privacy…..

Since the butchery of children to advance a radical and grotesque “transgender” agenda is a clear violation of the first tenet, it takes precedence over the second.

This was a brave act from a doctor who is willing to stand up and fulfill the duties of his oath and risk his professional career by speaking out against deeply embedded entities in our nation’s hospital-industrial complex that are pushing this insane “trans” agenda.

This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 7:07 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44324 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

No she will not because she supports it. Her support of child genital mutilation is why she supports going after the person who exposed it.


I’m aware.

But, in the spirit of fair play, I wanted to give her the chance to denounce the butchers perpetrating this child abuse.
Posted by Tider13
Member since Jun 2020
983 posts
Posted on 6/9/24 at 8:16 pm to
22000 posts and all of them are shite. frick off bitch.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 6:03 am to
quote:


But, in the spirit of fair play, I wanted to give her the chance to denounce the butchers perpetrating this child abuse.


Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21027 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:49 am to
This sounds like another intimidation tactic aimed at conservative views.

And see, the good doctor may well win in court, but it means a few years off his life before he is vindicated.

It really is a costly fight.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:55 am to
quote:

I'm a liberal about some things but definitely not about this stuff. You can support, say, a decent minimum wage or something like I do and at the same time think this tranny stuff is completely insane (which I think it is). It's called moderation and common sense.


Don’t pay attention to the downvotes. It’s admirable that you are dissenting from the progressive church on this topic. Shows that you aren’t subjugating your will to this cult. We need more people like you.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

HIPAA provisions allow doctors to release patient data that is not legally identifiable if it furthers legitimate statistical and scientific inquiries.


These released data were identifiable, and did not further any legitimate statistical or scientific inquiries.

If he had concerns, he could have met with knowledgeable individuals to have them addressed. Instead, he decided to violate federal law.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram