- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/9/24 at 12:40 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Final Rules were not adopted until early 2000s. Went into effect April, 2003. All penalties at that time were civil. Only later did they make them criminal and it required profit from the release of PHI. How did he profit from such information? You didn't answer it the other way I asked it. Insurance Portability was Title 1 which went into effect in the late 1990s.
If you have a problem with that, take it up with Congress in the 90s when they passed it.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:30 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
How did he profit from such information?
How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:36 pm to BamaAtl
quote:It's cute that you think he will get anything in the way of a fair trial from the feds.
How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:36 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!
How do we know the prosecutor isn’t a far-left extremist that supports child genital mutilation?
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:45 pm to BamaAtl
Are you going to denounce “gender affirming care?”
Posted on 6/9/24 at 2:57 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Good thing we'll have a trial to see IF he violated any laws!
quote:
The resident violated federal law.
Oh my
Posted on 6/9/24 at 3:02 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Are you going to denounce “gender affirming care?”
No she will not because she supports it. Her support of child genital mutilation is why she supports going after the person who exposed it.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 3:48 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
How do we know he wasn't paid by the far-right extremist blogs he leaked PHI to? Good thing we'll have a trial to see if he violated any laws!
How do we know you are a depraved butcher who supports the genital mutilation and chemical castration of children and adolescents?
We simply read this thread.
This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 6/9/24 at 4:02 pm to Toomer Deplorable
I violated my own rule and replied to the OP.
Everyone here could do better by not replying to threads where groomers are spiking the football.
Again, you can't reason with people who support pedophiles, child mutilation, and jailing opposition to it.
Everyone here could do better by not replying to threads where groomers are spiking the football.
Again, you can't reason with people who support pedophiles, child mutilation, and jailing opposition to it.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 4:23 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
Again, you can't reason with people who support pedophiles, child mutilation, and jailing opposition to it.
I take the opposite tack. Though I certainly am not operating from the delusion that these reprobates are here for an honest discussion, threads such as this should be bumped to demonstrate what these bloodthirsty ghouls actually support.
This entire “trans” agenda is not only an assault against science and reason, it is further evidence that the primary tenets of progressive ideology are increasingly centered in child sacrifice and thus aligned with demonic forces from the lower bowels of Hell. There really is no better way to describe it.
This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 6/9/24 at 5:58 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
The original article mentions that the clinic saw multiple patients with specific treatments "on the same day last week," which would indicate that dates and individual patient details were released. Even if you remove the names and things like MRNs and phone numbers, you're still in violation.
I can’t read the original article, I’m not seeing it.
That said, the threshold for HIPPAA on dates is admit/discharge dates, not so much on total time of stay.
It gets fuzzier after that. If the resident gave a specific date treatments happened, then he might have an issue.
If he just said “on the same day last week”, then proving a violation gets tougher because it’s more generalized.
I get why you’re passionate about this, for whatever weird reason you’re upset that he blew the whistle after the hospital publicly said they were stopping that kind of treatment.
You do you, but for kids sake I’m glad he blew the whistle.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 7:06 pm to riverdiver
quote:
I’m glad he blew the whistle.
You got that right.
As indicated by 808 above, HIPAA provisions allow doctors to release patient data that is not legally identifiable if it furthers legitimate statistical and scientific inquiries.
Yet even here, getting lost in the weeds over whether this doctor violated patient privacy laws ignores the main moral issue at play here.
The main issue that should be at the forefront of this discussion is a doctor’s duty to fulfill the Hippocratic Oath.
The Hippocratic Oath can be redacted into two main precepts: the primary tenet of the Hippocratic Oath is 1.) Do No Harm… while a secondary tent is 2.) Respect the patient’s privacy…..
Since the butchery of children to advance a radical and grotesque “transgender” agenda is a clear violation of the first tenet, it takes precedence over the second.
This was a brave act from a doctor who is willing to stand up and fulfill the duties of his oath and risk his professional career by speaking out against deeply embedded entities in our nation’s hospital-industrial complex that are pushing this insane “trans” agenda.
This post was edited on 6/9/24 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 6/9/24 at 7:52 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
No she will not because she supports it. Her support of child genital mutilation is why she supports going after the person who exposed it.
I’m aware.
But, in the spirit of fair play, I wanted to give her the chance to denounce the butchers perpetrating this child abuse.
Posted on 6/9/24 at 8:16 pm to BamaAtl
22000 posts and all of them are shite. frick off bitch.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 6:03 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
But, in the spirit of fair play, I wanted to give her the chance to denounce the butchers perpetrating this child abuse.

Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:49 am to Eurocat
This sounds like another intimidation tactic aimed at conservative views.
And see, the good doctor may well win in court, but it means a few years off his life before he is vindicated.
It really is a costly fight.
And see, the good doctor may well win in court, but it means a few years off his life before he is vindicated.
It really is a costly fight.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:55 am to Eurocat
quote:
I'm a liberal about some things but definitely not about this stuff. You can support, say, a decent minimum wage or something like I do and at the same time think this tranny stuff is completely insane (which I think it is). It's called moderation and common sense.
Don’t pay attention to the downvotes. It’s admirable that you are dissenting from the progressive church on this topic. Shows that you aren’t subjugating your will to this cult. We need more people like you.
Posted on 6/10/24 at 8:57 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
HIPAA provisions allow doctors to release patient data that is not legally identifiable if it furthers legitimate statistical and scientific inquiries.
These released data were identifiable, and did not further any legitimate statistical or scientific inquiries.
If he had concerns, he could have met with knowledgeable individuals to have them addressed. Instead, he decided to violate federal law.
Popular
Back to top


0


