Started By
Message

re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security

Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:38 pm to
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
13793 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:38 pm to
Your mother use to tell you that the other kids were "just jealous of you", didn't she?
Posted by Seeker
Member since Jul 2011
1970 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

This situation is not comparable to a normal deportation proceeding.


Why? Are the gang member not here illegally? What due process does an illegal immigrant have regarding deportation?

quote:

Not really. Bad analogy.


I will agree that is paints to a ridiculous scenario, much like district judges obstructing the elected leader of the executive branch and commander in chief.

Can you make a better analogy of the executive branch acting in a similar manner as what is occurring with these overreaching, law fare judges?

Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
75456 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:44 pm to
President Trump told Boozeberg to frick kff!
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
14463 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:45 pm to
So can members of criminals organizations be deported ? Can these members that prey upon citizens be defined as creating
terrorist acts or must a religious and or political activity only be considered as terrorism ?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Your mother use to tell you that the other kids were "just jealous of you", didn't she?


....no
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Why?

The lack of due process, for one.

quote:

Are the gang member not here illegally? What due process does an illegal immigrant have regarding deportation?

They have due process rights and we have a statutory scheme for normal deportations.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

So can members of criminals organizations be deported ?

If they're here illegally, they don't even need to be criminals or part of a "Criminal organization"
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
14975 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

They aren't terrorists


SFP now openly defending terrorist organizations
Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
21456 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:00 pm to
Good fuk all those Dem judges
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25879 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

So he can proclaim incursion against citizens domestically and that proclamation (and the actions done in furtherance of that action) are outside of judicial review?


In the litany of stupid things you've said, this is somehow the stupidest. Are you really arguing the ALIEN (hint, hint) and Sedition Act could be applied to citizens? Troll better, goober.
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
1375 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:03 pm to
Why is the Court so focused on the flight times?

I would think the Court would be more concerned with (assuming jurisdiction) whether the plaintiffs were actually who the government says they are - alien enemies. The Court certainly has that power to review the government's actions. Although they apparently have no power to review the actual order of deportation - from reading Ludecke.

Which raises another question: what, exactly, has the government said is not reviewable by the District Court?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Are you really arguing the ALIEN (hint, hint) and Sedition Act could be applied to citizens?

No. Not at all.

I'm saying by your standard, there is no process for reviewing this decision.

I am the one arguing that courts have the ability to review executive actions and ensure they conform with the limited authority granted by the specific statute (which, in this case, would permit them to rule the act does not apply to that class of person or specific individual, whichever the scope)
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
14463 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:10 pm to
Correct but you didn’t answer the questions
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
10408 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

there is no process for reviewing this decision.


Correct. This is not subject to judicial review. Cry more, pussy.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
43782 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:11 pm to
sometimes they do.... sometimes they dont.

see Biden pardons for reference
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Correct but you didn’t answer the questions

The answer was yes.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
69692 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

then Pardon the entire cabinet


Why?

They aren't commiting crimes
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

see Biden pardons for reference

Not statutory authority given to the Executive via Congress.
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
18019 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

I am the one arguing that courts have the ability to review executive actions and ensure they conform with the limited authority granted by the specific statute


What authority did the Executive demonstrate that the statute doesn't allow?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451051 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

What authority did the Executive demonstrate that the statute doesn't allow?


For one, statute text:

quote:

or any invasion or predatory incursion shall be perpetrated, attempted, or threatened against the territory of the United States, by any foreign nation or government


a. Is there an "invasion or predatory incursion"?

b. If that can be determined, what "foreign nation or government" directing this specific "invasion or predatory incursion"? Specifically, here, what official acts of Venezuela are directly associated with the "invasion or predatory incursion" (the acts used to define a) by TDA?
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram