Started By
Message

re: Does this mean that the term Louisiana Tigers has to go next?

Posted on 4/24/17 at 9:25 pm to
Posted by vl100butch
Ridgeland, MS
Member since Sep 2005
37101 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

I guess I have to explain for what seems like the 100th time that the Bengal Tiger in Louisiana Military Heraldry goes back to 1838 with the formation of the Washington Artillery of New Orleans, which is still in the order of battle of the US Army...the unit crests of the 141st and 935th Field Artillery have a Bengal Tiger in them... Dan Hardesty and Pete Finney both said the Washington Artillery was one of the sources of the Tiger nickname...

then I guess the SJWs want to insult the memory of Claire Chennault and the Flying Tigers, which were a group of Americans who volunteered to protect people of another race...

What a SJW hears: Blah blah blah fought in the civil war (racist) blah blah blah


oddly enough, I learned something tonight...why the Army renumbered all the state units during WW1...

for those who don't know, the National Guard Divisions were set up as 26-50, originally starting in New England with the 26th Division and working through New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia (27th, 28th, 29th), the Carolinas (30th), Georgia and Florida (31st), then starting the count again in the Midwest with the 32d Division...there was another group from 51-75 and today's USAR started with the 76th up....

anyway, you can pretty much tell which state a unit comes from by dividing an infantry regiment number by 4, or a field artillery unit by 3...for example, the Pennsylvania National Guard has 109-112 Infantry Regiments, 107-109 Field Artillery Regiments, 103d Engineers...like Louisiana has the 156th Infantry and 141st Field Artillery (39th Division)...
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63430 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:16 pm to
I had two great, great uncles who were in Company I, 9th Louisiana Infantry, but weren't at Gettysburg. Both got wounded at Antietam and were back at home in Covington during the battle.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55342 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:41 pm to
How about "The Fighting Snowflakes"?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Does this mean that the term Louisiana Tigers has to go next?


No. Because the modern Mike the Tiger is a tranny.

It's all good now.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117597 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

I guess that us Auburn folks will have to re-write the story of War Eagle.


Ya'll are The Plainsmen. That excludes women. It also connotes men with guns crossing the plains and killing defenseless animals.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65891 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Crimson Tide


Maybe I'm missing something here. What political purpose could getting rid of crimson tide serve?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66112 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 2:55 pm to
crimson tide is offensive transgenders who can't have a period
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram