- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DNI Gabbard Releases US-Funded Biolab Evidence, including Ukraine
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:46 pm to Crimson K
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:46 pm to Crimson K
quote:
I don't think that the Russian narrative of bioweapons labs was the big worry people had.
That's specifically the primary CT of the time that was shot down.
Now people are trying to change history and shift the CTs of 2022-2023 (and the accompanying denials) to another CT (like GOF research)
It's the bait and switch of CTs.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:47 pm to tide06
quote:
I’m not sure the MSM has told the truth on any major story of the last 20 years.
The NPR article linked earlier denying the CTs of 2022 has been proven true
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah you need to re-read
quote:SFP, I couldn't care less about your idiotic protestations and obfuscations. The case has already been well established and the only thing Tulsi did is put an official government stamp on what informed people already knew
You're trying to turn that
quote:Typical SFP "I can't refute it so I'll just ramble for a bit"
We already established this in 2022. Nothing revealed today has any real addition to those conversations from 3-4 years ago
Ok champ. Let us know when you have something substantive to say. Like actual proof
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
SlowtrafficcopPro laying down thew law! 
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:50 pm to somethingdifferent
I can't speak for everybody else who's been following this since the Russian invasion began in February of 2022, but the fourth page of that PDF is brand new information to me. Research code name designations, virus names, and the specific installations where they were being conducted - this is the first time seeing those sorts of details.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No one cares about that non-commital crap. I asked you for refutation of the connections that have been made ITT. THAT'S what people are referring to.
No evidence of offensive bioweapons programs is presented (consistent with prior assessments);
Oh and your stupid quote ignores a NOVEL virus so it's not even right on that point
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:It hasn't been "shot down." It's all but a fact at this point. Unless you deny the existence of covid19
That's specifically the primary CT of the time that was shot down.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:55 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
No one cares about that non-commital crap.
You're confused.
I responded to bard's post specifically discussing biological weapons with:
quote:
What, specifically in the documents released by Tulsi today specifically references any of those 3 things?
You replied to that quote with:
quote:
This has already all been laid out and you know it. People are drawing you pictures ITT connecting the dots because everyone knows you're slow
I gave you specific language from grok confirming the NPR article that no biological weapons were being made.
Now you're saying you don't care about the conversation you asked a question about. Classic
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:56 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
It hasn't been "shot down." It's all but a fact at this point.
Again, you're saying the above about this quote:
quote:
I don't think that the Russian narrative of bioweapons labs was the big worry people had.
grok:
quote:
No evidence of offensive bioweapons programs is presented (consistent with prior assessments);
Posted on 6/12/26 at 12:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
false claim of U.S. bioweapons development in Ukraine,
Because gain-of-function research is so purely beneficial the federal government was doing it offshore?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:00 pm to Powerman
quote:
This makes no sense. If you're trying to keep something secret why would you nudge people to invasion.
The belief was that Putin was going to expose the labs (as well as take their research). The nudge was to keep Putin from doing so.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:01 pm to Bard
quote:
Because gain-of-function research is so purely beneficial the federal government was doing it offshore?
THAT is a pivot
You posted an article specific to bioweapons.
You cannot engage in an honest response by trying to retroactively change that to "gain of function research"
You're proving my point correct in real time
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:03 pm to VoxDawg
The US did fund cleanup of biowarfare labs across the former the former satellites of the USSR from Kazakhstan to Ukraine and conversion to other uses.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Did you not take your meds today? You're all over the place. What I said to you was clear, straightforward and facile.
You're confused.
quote:You gave crap
I gave you specific language from grok confirming the NPR article that no biological weapons were being made
quote:I'm not asking about the conversation genius. This is one of your worst meltdowns ever.
you asked a question about
Prove that bioweapons haven't been/aren't being produced
Do you have factual refutations of all the connections made ITT?
Prove that covid19 was not released near a US linked lab and that GOF research was not used in its production.
Wow
This post was edited on 6/12/26 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:04 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
I remember at the start of the Ukraine war, Russian telegram accounts were talking about the bio labs they found in Ukraine.
A month into it when Ukraine hadn't folded, Russian TV pundits were claiming that Ukrainian biolabs were using US military drugs to turn Ukrainians into super soldiers and why Russian forces were stopped and being beaten back
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Conspiracy theorists are on one helluva roll.
Can you define the specific conspiracy theory?
Apparently, Temu Ketanji, you missed EVERY SINGLE OCCASION when Fauci was grilled by Senator Rand Paul.
PS - Rand Paul happens to be an MD, which even outranks being a divorce lawyer from Lake Charles when it comes to all things biolabby.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:How many times do people have to connect the dots for you
You posted an article specific to bioweapons.
You cannot engage in an honest response by trying to retroactively change that to "gain of function research"
You're proving my point correct in real time
Is this you without the meds? DAMN
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:10 pm to VoxDawg
How many of you went through the chain to see the release of information on reduction of biohazards as what was funded. All of it leftover from the Soviet Era.?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:12 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
How many times do people have to connect the dots for you
Lord I hope you're trying to salvage the terrible arguments by tripling down with "CV19was a bioweapon" insanity
Posted on 6/12/26 at 1:12 pm to CitizenK
quote:
How many of you went through the chain to see the release of information on reduction of biohazards as what was funded. All of it leftover from the Soviet Era.?
None of them, because it doesn't fit the NPC narrative (of the day, which this thread has proven changes regularly)
Popular
Back to top



4





