- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DNI Gabbard Releases US-Funded Biolab Evidence, including Ukraine
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You dodged the question as to who released CV19 when your attempt at a conspiracy was preemptively destroyed. Don't think i didn't notice
I posted it a few posts up. Might wanna read before posting…
2
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:09 am to Placekicker
quote:'
posted it a few posts up.
Did you answer or just post an X post?
Are you talking about THIS post?
A post that has no rational connection to CV19 and doesn't clearly state who, in your theory, released it?
quote:
Rearding the Ukrainian BioLabs.
There's a whole swarm of shills crying and whining about it, spining that Ukrainian BioLabs are "old news" and the thing is going on since the early 90s and it was always all transparent.
The main argument is that on the map of those Ukrainian Labs there is visibly no BSL - 4 classification sites in Ukraine.
However there are many BSL-3 sites, and when you do just a bit of reading and add the fact that in recently published ODNI press release GAIN OF FUNCTION is mentioned, you don't have to be a genius to add 2 and 2 together.
Here's a graphic i made just for that purpose.
When you come at them with that, they will quickly lose their microbiology and virology expertise and come at you with the usual stupid shite to support their narrative.
It's all there, you just have to use a bit of discernment, which these people don't posses.
Enjoy.
BSL-3 pathogens can advance to BSL-4 by GAIN OF FUNCTION.
End of story.
Literally no relation to my question.
This post was edited on 6/14/26 at 9:11 am
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:11 am to Placekicker
Y’all ever notice that SFP spends most of his time in threads that threaten the narratives the Deep State pushes? These bio labs? He’s here. Election fraud? He’s all up in it. Europe systematically destroying itself on orders from the WEF? That’s where he lives.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:14 am to Placekicker
quote:
Yes, I am alleging that the Democrats, intentionally released a man-made biological weapon, via their foreign black site USAID-funded labs, to justify mass mail-in ballots, in which they harvested and delivered to deep blue counties in swing states. Covid was the next phase of the treasonous coup, after the Russia hoax and impeachment attempts failed.
So Democrats got China to release a virus that completely destroyed China, and China just...went along with it?
Or are you now saying it wasn't even released from the Wuhan lab?
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:20 am to Placekicker
That in no way responds to my question.
Are you claiming CV19 did not originate in China?
Are you claiming CV19 did not originate in China?
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:22 am to VoxDawg
This is why the world came to no the Vindman family
Proving a Negative
There are no bioweapons in Ukraine
By Cindy Goff-Vindman
https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/proving-negative
It really matters what Russia and China think. Not the lies that we hear
Oh, and now Cindy founded
https://www.syntheticbiologysummit.com/2026/speakers/cindy-groff-vindman
Proving a Negative
There are no bioweapons in Ukraine
By Cindy Goff-Vindman
https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/proving-negative
quote:
Russian government has pushed disinformation suggesting that Ukraine, in violation of Article I of the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), has active bioweapon programs and that the United States has supported those efforts. China has echoed these claims and they have been picked up and amplified, in part or wholly by political actors within the United States.
It really matters what Russia and China think. Not the lies that we hear
Oh, and now Cindy founded
https://www.syntheticbiologysummit.com/2026/speakers/cindy-groff-vindman
quote:
Dr. Cindy Groff-Vindman is a molecular geneticist and biotechnology executive focused on the transition of industrial biology from promising science to durable manufacturing businesses within the emerging bioeconomy. Her work sits at the intersection of synthetic biology, industrial biomanufacturing, and national security.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:22 am to Placekicker
A live look at SFP when the DNI reveals US funded bio labs in Ukraine.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you claiming CV19 did not originate in China?
I am not. Just another gain of function project by Fauci.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:25 am to Placekicker
quote:
A live look at SFP when the DNI reveals US funded bio labs in Ukraine.
Why? I have never disputed these exist.
It's the "biological weapons" part that still has no support, and I continue to point this out.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:25 am to Placekicker
quote:
I am not. Just another gain of function project by Fauci.
So you're posting irrelevancy to dodge questions about your theory about who released CV19. Brilliant work.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:26 am to Placekicker
For the folks in Spectator mode, it's important to recognize that as this additional confirmations n comes from ODNI, the folks who seek to scrape some sort of rhetorical victory in their "nuh-UHHHHHHH!" rebuttals also told you months/years ago that there was no evidence about the GOF research in the first place.
Now that it's coming out, they'll persist in telling you that the next thing is coming won't be, no matter the evidence put before your lying eyes. They also enjoy using the amount of time that's passed since some of us have initially picked up on what the Presidents team have been laying down as some sort of indictment against what we see proven years later... nevermind the underscore that provides to the assertions that we've held our ground on for almost a decade bearing fruit in 2026 and beyond.
Now that it's coming out, they'll persist in telling you that the next thing is coming won't be, no matter the evidence put before your lying eyes. They also enjoy using the amount of time that's passed since some of us have initially picked up on what the Presidents team have been laying down as some sort of indictment against what we see proven years later... nevermind the underscore that provides to the assertions that we've held our ground on for almost a decade bearing fruit in 2026 and beyond.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:29 am to VoxDawg
quote:
, it's important to recognize that as this additional confirmations n comes from ODNI, the folks who seek to scrape some sort of rhetorical victory in their "nuh-UHHHHHHH!" rebuttals also told you months/years ago that there was no evidence about the GOF research in the first place.
Vox lying means it's a day that ends in "Y"
quote:
Now that it's coming out, they'll persist in telling you that the next thing is coming won't be, no matter the evidence put before your lying eyes. T
No people like me actually make arguments and don't pivot like y'all are with the shift form "biological weapons program" arguments of 2022-2023 to "Gain of function"
My stance is clear. We have no evidence of a biological weapons program in Ukraine in the "bio labs". Russia lied about these claims, and the MSM correctly reported on these lies by Russia. Further, dishonest types are trying to engage in a specific Motte and Bailey fallacy by pretending "bio labs" means "bio weapons program" to dishonestly claim these MSM reports were false. They're also dishonestly pivoting to redefine "biological weapons program" into both standard viral research and GOF research, trying to create a nexus between Ukraine and CV19.
People like me don't have to engage in the dishonesty and logical fallacies that you just projected above.
This post was edited on 6/14/26 at 9:43 am
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
I am right with tude!
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why? I have never disputed these exist. It's the "biological weapons" part that still has no support, and I continue to point this out.
SFP- I acknowledge that COVID was a gain of function bioweapon that came from as US funded lab in China, but that’s the only one. There is no way that Fauci and the US would do secret gain of function work on other viruses in Ukraine or any of the 130 secret labs around the world. No way. Didn’t happen. Even though the DNI, with access to more updated information than my 2022 Biden era propaganda, is laying it out for us.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:54 am to Placekicker
quote:
SFP- I acknowledge that COVID was a gain of function bioweapon that came from as US funded lab in China, but that’s the only one. There is no way that Fauci and the US would do secret gain of function work on other viruses in Ukraine or any of the 130 secret labs around the world. No way. Didn’t happen. Even though the DNI, with access to more updated information than my 2022 Biden era propaganda, is laying it out for us.
You're conflating "bio labs" with "biological weapons" and also with "Gain of function research" now.
You just keep changing your argument.
This post was edited on 6/14/26 at 9:55 am
Posted on 6/14/26 at 9:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:What arguments have I made and I haven't refused anything. Just because you're too lazy to hit the back button doesn't mean I'm lazy. The evidence has been posted on this board for years and you know this. You're being obtuse and trying to blame someone else for your disingenuous behavior
Basically every one of your arguments has no support, and you refuse to cite this support
Posted on 6/14/26 at 10:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're conflating "bio labs" with "biological weapons" and also with "Gain of function research" now.
You just keep changing your argument.
Wrong. Either you’re being contrarian, which is likely, or you’re willfully obtuse.
Posted on 6/14/26 at 10:02 am to Placekicker
quote:
Wrong.
Which of the 3 are you arguing?
1. Bio labs
2. Biological weapons/program
3. Gain of function
I don't care which you pick, but you need to pick one as your argument and reject the other 2.
Page 25 of 29
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News