re: DNI Gabbard Releases US-Funded Biolab Evidence, including Ukraine

quote:

---

Logic is not your strong suit

---

Quote her

quote:

---

Quote her

---

You don't understand that my argument doesn't require me to quote her in that way, even though this has been explained to you in several ways.

I'm proving several claims misinterpreting what she released and said are wrong, by using what was actually released/said.

Now that I've proven their mistakes/dishonesty, the burden shifts to them to find evidence to support their claims. My job is done. Trying to require me to find more information to support arguments I didn't make is not logical.

I hope you finally understand this. I can't explain it more simply.

quote:

---

Likely not

---

"Likely." So you don't know for sure. So now you have FINALLY adopted an agnostic position so you can stop saying that Tulsi is stoking conspiracy theory. It's POSSIBLE that:

covid19 was a "bioweapon" (which we know now for sure that it was)
that it came from a US funded biolab
which was the product of GOF research, aka highly highly super duper illegal and unethical

quote:

---

What specific evidence do you have to link the lab in Wuhan that created CV19 with any "biolab" in Ukraine?

---

OMG. You mean other than all of the information that's already been discussed ITT?

quote:

---

with any "biolab" in Ukraine?

---

Prove that it wasn't

You have nothing

I would like to point out that I forced SFP into an agnostic position

I AM THE KING OF THE WORLD

quote:

---

Oh, I was unaware that average doctors were doing gain of function genetics experiments that had been outlawed.

---

You're pivoting and trying to reframe the discussion.

quote:

---

OMG. You mean other than all of the information that's already been discussed ITT?

---

There has been literally zero specific link between the Wuhan lab and Ukraine. Link the posts that you're referring to.

quote:

---

Prove that it wasn't

---

That is not logically possible. You can't prove a negative.

quote:

---

SFP: Tulsi didn't say there were bioweapons

---

You're creating a straw man

I said what she said/released didn't support the argument of a biological weapons program in Ukraine.

Why be dishonest?

quote:

---

How have you gone this entire thread without using anything to support your position

---

quote:

---

while I have supported mine in several ways?

---

Ok "reframe" and "pivot" coward

quote:

---

Why do you always do this?

---

Says the person who won't answer simple questions. Dodge ball super champ

quote:

---

I literally just directed you to 2 posts to support my point

---

Quote them

quote:

---

You then strawman this

---

Asking you to answer a simple question is a "strawman"

Hey SFP, do you think Leavitt will be healthy by the opener?

DON'T YOU DARE ANSWER THAT FREAKING QUESTION BECAUSE IT'S OFF TOPIC

quote:

---

You don't understand that my argument doesn't require me to quote her in that way

---

So your whole position falls apart because you are relying on her not acknowledging bioweapons

quote:

---

using what was actually released/said

---

OMG. You just said your position doesn't rely on this. Which is it? You are relying on her comments or not?

quote:

---

the burden shifts to them to find evidence to support their claims

---

Which has been all too happily provided ITT which you keep ignoring

quote:

---

My job is done

---

quote:

---

I can't explain it more simply

---

Do you think the republicans will lose the midterms?

quote:

---

You're pivoting and trying to reframe the discussion.

---

And you're frickin lying like you do every single time you ever post anything.