- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DNI Gabbard Releases US-Funded Biolab Evidence, including Ukraine
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:22 pm to Placekicker
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:22 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Who has more access to information- Tulsi or the MSM??
The documents Tulsi just released do not support the argument of a biological warfare program at these biolabs.
You do realize this, right?
Tulsi never made specific claims that these biolabs supported any such biological warfare prgram.
You do realize this, right?
My argument is based both in what Tulsi has said and the documents she released.
Why do YOU think you have more information than Tulsi?
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 6:23 pm
3
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The documents Tulsi just released do not support the argument of a biological warfare program at these biolabs.
You do realize this, right
You think she released everything she had??? Keep believing the MSM- it truly explains a lot.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 6:24 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:23 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Prove that didn't happen
The argument is about what these documents say about these programs.
You are just displaying your reading comprehension issues and inability to follow discussions.
quote:
Nope nope nope. No one is doing this.
You yourself are doing this by trying to reframe it to a discussion of CV19
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's exactly what's going on. I have quoted it genius
Not even what's going on
quote:WAS COVID19 NATURALLY OCCURING? Yes or no? Answer the question with proof
Why do y'all have such problems reading relatively simple arguments?
quote:You're not fooling anyone
Why do you insist on creating strawmen instead?
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:24 pm to Placekicker
quote:
You think she released everything she had???
So you are basing your argument off evidence not publicly released? Where did you review these documents?
And you agree these documents release by Tulsi do not, in fact, confirm the prior conspiracy theories, correct?
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:25 pm to somethingdifferent
Slowbullshitpro still spinning!
fricking shocker
fricking shocker
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:25 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
WAS COVID19 NATURALLY OCCURING?
Example of you trying to reframe the conversation in real time
CV19 has nothing to do with this conversation.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Quote them
My proof is in Tulsi's releases, which do not confirm any biological warfare program
quote:It's been corroborated ITT, that I have referenced numerous, numerous times. Just because you pretend it doesn't exist doesn't mean you've fooled anyone
Now the burden is on you to prove this biological warfare program existed
quote:Still debatable
which goes against both these releases
quote:
the MSM reporting of 2022-2023
BWAHAHAHAHAHAPosted on 6/13/26 at 6:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So you are basing your argument off evidence not publicly released? Where did you review these documents?
You’re the one arguing they don’t exist. I’m telling you that she has access to information that your precious msm doesn’t.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The documents Tulsi just released do not support the argument of a biological warfare program at these biolabs.
Again, dumbass, the only difference between a biolab and a bioweapons lab is intent. That's it. Anything within those labs can be used as a bioweapon. Which means that ALL such biolabs are potential bioweapons labs.
Reasonable people understand this and this is why we continue to call you a fricking idiot.
The question is whether or not they were conducting illicit research at these labs. And they were.
You can continue to try to carry water for criminals if you want, but you just continue to look like a fricking retard with every post you make.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Typical dodge
Holy irrelevancy
quote:Prove it
typically unsupported conspiracy nonsense or straight up dishonesty.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:26 pm to Placekicker
quote:
You’re the one arguing they don’t exist. I
No
I'm arguing these documents don't' support the argument that they exist
Try following the actual discussion and stop creating strawmen
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:27 pm to AlterEd
quote:
, the only difference between a biolab and a bioweapons lab is intent.
That's an attempt to reframe the argument. You're proving my point.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Then why did she make the announcement at all? Let's hear it mindreader
The documents Tulsi just released do not support the argument of a biological warfare program at these biolabs
quote:Was covid19 naturally occuring?
Tulsi never made specific claims that these biolabs supported any such biological warfare prgram
You won't touch that one quote:Quote where she denied that the labs were used for harm. Show me the quote.
My argument is based both in what Tulsi has said and the documents she released
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:28 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Prove it
Tulsi just proved it for me
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
Also, by claiming that the DNI is placating conspiracy theorists by releasing this information, you establish yourself as a conspiracy theorist.
The irony indeed.
The irony indeed.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:29 pm to somethingdifferent
quote:
Then why did she make the announcement at all?
Politics
To get people like you to act dishonestly like you have in this thread
It clearly worked.
quote:
Was covid19 naturally occuring?
CV19 has nothing to do with this discussion. That's a pivot/reframe attempt.
quote:
Quote where she denied that the labs were used for harm
Another pivot/reframe attempt.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:29 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Also, by claiming that the DNI is placating conspiracy theorists by releasing this information, you establish yourself as a conspiracy theorist.
By this retarded definition, every political ad is a conspiracy theory
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Nope. That's in your stupid head. There have been numerous posts saying otherwise. You are arguing against the wind.
The argument is about what these documents say about these programs
quote:Because you are trying to have a conversation that has nothing to do with the topic and multiple people are correcting you
You are just displaying your reading comprehension issues and inability to follow discussions
quote:Why won't you answer a simple question that's on topic, even if you think it's not on topic? Was covid10 naturally occurring? You answer that and then you will know why it's on topic
You yourself are doing this by trying to reframe it to a discussion of CV19
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You are basing your position off of mindreading and what she DID NOT say
you are basing your argument off evidence not publicly released?
quote:Quote where she said there were never any bioweapons
Where did you review these documents?
Page 16 of 29
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News