Didn't Lindell successful show that our elections are pre-planned?

This is the USA. Truth doesn't matter.

Just send your kids to die for corporate profits and Zionism and shut the frick up.

Lol no, none of that was demonstrated and that’s not even remotely how our elections work.

Posts like this are why Mike held the symposium.

quote:

---

Lol no, none of that was demonstrated and that’s not even remotely how our elections work.

---

See MicKey, you POS. I knew you had nothing.

It's the same as that scene in Narcos Mexico

quote:

---

Posts like this are why Mike held the symposium

---

I've liked Lindell for a while, and his rags-to-riches (or crack-to-riches) story is what makes America the place people are willing to die trying to reach. I also WANT him to be right on this particular issue.

That said, he needs to work on the elevator pitch. The farther down the statistical trail he goes, the more he loses any potential audience. Hell, I've accumulated 4 college degrees of my own, and I'm still struggling to keep up. Not that I'm any kind of subject matter expert AT ALL--my degrees were mostly the result of staying in college too damn long.

Way back in my engineering days I took an advanced physics class at LSU. The instructor was Greek, and he may as well have been speaking Greek because I could barely understand anything. One day he was gone to a conference, and he arranged for a retired professor emeritus to teach us. For that one golden day, I was able to understand both the content AND the instructor. It was a single moment of clarity in an entire semester of confusion. For one beautiful day, I had an instructor who could make the complex issues of physics comprehensible to me. I guess sort of like Rush Limbaugh would later do for many in the political arena.

From my perspective, Lindell needs someone like that to present a coherent "big picture" for him. Maybe that moment of clarity is yet to come. It certainly seems like Lindell has a lot of evidence--statistical and otherwise. He has put together overall good videography, and he has plenty of experts on-hand. Maybe the Thursday PM release will prove the fraud, dispel the critics, and start a revolution.

Or maybe this is the world's longest MyPillow infomercial.

quote:

---

It seems the narrative is that the entire thing was a flop. But it seems to me that they successfully demonstrated that the voting results, as well as the populations and registered voters are fake.

---

The narrative was always going to be that the event was a flop, no matter what they uncovered. I thought it was a concise and accurate demonstration of how flawed our electoral system really is.

I would wager that 99% of the people who are actively trying to discredit the symposium didn’t watch it

quote:

---

The narrative was always going to be that the event was a flop, no matter what they uncovered. I thought it was a concise and accurate demonstration of how flawed our electoral system really is.

I would wager that 99% of the people who are actively trying to discredit the symposium didn’t watch it

---

I watched it. It was trash with nothing new revealed.

You are making the assertion, you need to be more descriptive than this.

You are stating there are state driven algorithms that create voter rolls, yet, neither side claims this as a problem in counties across America, where they all get to validate.

How was Trump able to flip as many counties as he did in 2016 with these mathematical predictability tables from Census data that would have likely countered your exact statements in your second through fourth paragraphs?

I didn't see the internet portion you mention in your fifth paragraph, you need to elaborate

From what the headline of all of this was, as to show what actually happened in an undeniable fashion that would make a 9-0 SCOTUS vote to invalidate the election and put Trump back in office, this has so far not indicated anything close to that.

Burden of proof is on the accuser, so there has to be more for this to have legs.

quote:

---

it would be a simple matter to pick counties at random and decide how accurate his conclusion is.

---

That's what I would like to see--maybe something where Lindell throws a dart at a random state/county then get the math guy to "predict" what the result should be vs. what was reported. Or maybe go back and show how his algorithm works using the 1990 census and the 2000 vote.

The problem is obviously that assuming the tallies are correct, the 2020 election was "decided" by fewer than 125K votes in 4 states. I didn't keep up with the precise tallies post-election, but the margins Pew reported on 12/4/20 were PA 1.2%, WI 0.6%, AZ 0.33%, and GA 0.25%. So, Lindell would be looking for the proverbial haystack needle in those states.

I guess the argument would be that DJT won decidedly in these states so the fraud would have been more widespread in order to counter his legitimate votes. Unfortunately, I believe the Dems could have put together 125k votes using dead bodies and their usual, garden-variety voter fraud.

Maybe the key is Ohio: DJT won there by all metrics, and his overall "loss" broke a longstanding streak of the winning Ohio Republican candidate prevailing nationally. Or something like that. Maybe Lindell's guys need to show how their calculations work in a place like Ohio where the Dems were likely trying (but substantially failing) to interfere.