Started By
Message

re: Did China or Automation kill America's Steel Industry?

Posted on 3/3/18 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27935 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

If your labor costs are too high for a commodity, you will not be competitive.


Here's what most people don't understand about the steel industry. Making that stuff is brutal and dangerous. It's better than it used to be,but it is still about the roughest job a person can have.

Yes,steel workers make a good paycheck,in The United States. They have to..or they wouldn't do it.

You wouldn't believe how many times I've seen new hires,who had quit pretty good jobs,because of a chance at better pay,came into the melt shop ( That's exactly what it is),first explosion (which is common)or a big fire,or a hot spot on a furnace or Ladle, Maybe a bad chemistry in a heat,and the steel is boiling out. They would walk the hell out on their first day.
If it doesn't pay good,you may as well not try to have a steel mill in the U.S.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67079 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 12:02 pm to
Neither: The EPA
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23701 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 12:06 pm to
Heavy industry raw material production is always cheaper if you can just dump the waste and byproduct on the ground, in the river or release it into the air. China is poisoning its people and land, like we used to do, with its production practices. But no regulation and slave wages does make it cheaper to produce.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25343 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 12:21 pm to
I think the Edgar Thompson Works is still there in Braddock as a US Steel mill. It still runs with two blast furnaces just upriver from Pittsburgh.

I think that was Andrew Carnegie's first steel mill built from the ground up.

Must have been interesting to live in this area in the 1960s and 1970s when mills like that lined the rivers.
This post was edited on 3/3/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

I don't care if someone is an environmentalist. Cool. What bothers me is the hypocrisy. If you are an environmentalist, I have a few recommendations: 1) Sell your car and ride a bike 2) Cut power to your home (unless you are self-sufficient with solar panels) 3) Do not buy smartphones 4) Never take a plane anywhere 5) Do not buy products from China

How can I tell you're VERY stupid? By the very stupid things you say.

We can have a nice balance of cars, power, smartphones, planes, products from China... ALL while seeking renewable energies and keeping the environment clean. In the long run it's more expensive to clean up pollution and pay for its health effects than to keep things clean to begin with.
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11087 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 1:16 pm to
Steel Industry began shedding jobs in the 60’s as production started becoming more efficient which eventually became full automation. Add to that cheap Chinese labor and more effective recycling methods.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32095 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

We can have a nice balance of cars, power, smartphones, planes, products from China...


How do we control air pollution in industrialized China?
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 3:20 pm to
China is fifth on the list of steel importers brah. Trump is playing up to the ignorance of the American public with this tariff bullshite, especially when china is singled out.

Our good neighbor and ally Canada is number one.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123894 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

China is fifth on the list of steel importers brah.
That list does not include transhipping and manufacturing workarounds.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 3/3/18 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Labor is only a small part of the savings.


False. The average median income in the first world countries of the EU, North America, and Australia/New Zealand is anywhere from 1000% to 1500% higher than those of third world countries like China and India.

Not that regulations don't play a part - and we should be addressing that on the home front - but the labor savings are massive and using blanket tariffs against countries with low standards of living to equalize that part of the equation is a very good idea.


Thanks for providing all those facts to support your claims. For a second it looked like just another paragraph or two of unsubstantiated bullshite.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram