- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dershowitz read the indictment
Posted on 8/2/23 at 7:44 pm to POTUS2024
Posted on 8/2/23 at 7:44 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
He's not a fan of the indictment, obviously, or what it does to the nation. His attack on the logic of the indictment and it's logical consequences is important for those that still believe in civil liberties, IMO.
Ronbots/Dims don’t give a rat’s arse about anyone’s rights.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 8/2/23 at 7:51 pm to WaltWhite504
quote:
It's funny y'all like this guy.
Nobody was closer to Epstein. He's all over the plane logs - went to the island innumerable times - defended Epstein in court and on TV - one of the girls even named him as her rapist two times.
And yet....you don't care
Hypocrisy in the dictionary just asked to list this as an example
Wow, go cook some Meth Walt, you are getting delusional due to your DT's.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:05 pm to WaltWhite504
I think you do not know what hypocrisy means.
You know, Hitler said some things that were correct. So did the unabomber. So did countless other people who were also scum.
You're the type of person who contributes to the WWE aura of our national discourse. You shoot the messenger without regard to the message, and often times without even knowing the message.
You know, Hitler said some things that were correct. So did the unabomber. So did countless other people who were also scum.
You're the type of person who contributes to the WWE aura of our national discourse. You shoot the messenger without regard to the message, and often times without even knowing the message.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:06 pm to POTUS2024
Did Dershowitz record that from Little St. James?
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:08 pm to LuckyTiger
He's a pedo.
I don't care his pedo opinion. He's just saying what he needs to say so the people who pull his strings don't release his pedo rape tape.
I don't care his pedo opinion. He's just saying what he needs to say so the people who pull his strings don't release his pedo rape tape.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:09 pm to WaltWhite504
You and your boyfriend Damone are both idiots
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:10 pm to deuceiswild
quote:
You're the type of person who contributes to the WWE aura of our national discourse. You shoot the messenger without regard to the message, and often times without even knowing the message.
And y'all are the people on the deck of the Titanic trying to figure out how to fix the boat when you need to jump ship
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:10 pm to POTUS2024
All of this theatre is doubling down on trump’s support
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:11 pm to WaltWhite504
Bruh, think about what you are saying. You don't think whatever mafia has that info wouldn't want to bury him for being pro-Trump the last year or two? He has said he basically lost all his friends defending Trump on a lot of the legal BS thrown at Trump the last few years.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 8:12 pm
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:14 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
In this case they will likely have to prove that Trump knew or believed that he had lost the election when he made the statements he made.
Said this in my thread. It’s fricking crazy. They will still win even though they can’t prove (I don’t think) that he didn’t believe all those frickers telling him he lost.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:15 pm to Iron Lion
Trumpcucks are simping for Alan Dershowitz now 
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:28 pm to WaltWhite504
quote:it is not a question of whether one “likes“ Dershowitz. You either recognize that he is a brilliant constitutional scholar, are you do not.
funny y'all like this guy.
If you do not, I question YOUR intelligence.
if you do not because you do not like his politics, doubly so.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:30 pm to Damone
If the trial takes place in Washington with this the judge the jury will convict Trump in under an hour. He may very well win an appeal but there is no chance he will be found innocent at this venue. The jury will have their minds made up the moment they enter the court room and they will not even listen to the evidence.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:32 pm to POTUS2024
Most agree this is nonsense... just like NYC. Document case ... not so much.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:33 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
The indictment is… marginal, to be polite.
any competent attorney can see that
Even a broken clock is right twice a day...have a VERY rare upvote
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:49 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Document is so strange that under its own rubric or logic, Jack Smith could be indicted. It goes after Trump for an alleged lie - but Jack Smith lied as well. He outlines Trump's Jan6 speech. He deliberately leaves out key words, about protesting peacefully, that keeps Trump's actions within the first amendment. Thus Jack Smith lied, left them out of the indictment, and under his own theory of the case that lies can be criminalized, Jack Smith can now be indicted.
Is there an incitement charge?
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:57 pm to POTUS2024
Jack Smith Admitted to lying to the court about evidence.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/jack-smiths-team-admits-incorrect-claim-about-evidence-trump-classified
His cases will fall apart or be thrown out.
quote:
Special counsel Jack Smith's team admitted to incorrectly claiming to have turned over evidence as required by law in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump.
quote:
"The Government’s representation at the July 18 hearing that all surveillance footage the Government had obtained pre-indictment had been produced was therefore incorrect,"
quote:
All CCTV footage obtained by the government has now been given to the defendants, according to Smith's team.
The so-called Brady rule requires prosecutors to disclose all evidence and information favorable to the defendant.
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/jack-smiths-team-admits-incorrect-claim-about-evidence-trump-classified
His cases will fall apart or be thrown out.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 9:01 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
- Document is so strange that under its own rubric or logic, Jack Smith could be indicted. It goes after Trump for an alleged lie - but Jack Smith lied as well. He outlines Trump's Jan6 speech. He deliberately leaves out key words, about protesting peacefully, that keeps Trump's actions within the first amendment. Thus Jack Smith lied, left them out of the indictment, and under his own theory of the case that lies can be criminalized, Jack Smith can now be indicted.
Jfc Dersh has lost it shilling for clicks on Rumble.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 9:17 pm to Decatur
It’s as if he didn’t read the indictment. He has the maga brain worms.
Posted on 8/2/23 at 9:54 pm to cwill
quote:
Decatur: Jfc Dersh has lost it
quote:
cwill: He has the maga brain worms.
I think I see the problem here
Dershowitz is a man of principles. Obviously this a completely foreign concept to you 2 fricking mongoloids.
The way that works—operating on principle (and logic, which y’all will also find baffling)—is you disregard political party, emotion, and even personal preference when determining a course of action or position.
Y’all should try it some time.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 9:56 pm
Popular
Back to top


0








