Started By
Message

re: Dershowitz read the indictment

Posted on 8/2/23 at 7:44 pm to
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
10137 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

He's not a fan of the indictment, obviously, or what it does to the nation. His attack on the logic of the indictment and it's logical consequences is important for those that still believe in civil liberties, IMO.

Ronbots/Dims don’t give a rat’s arse about anyone’s rights.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 7:45 pm
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8612 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

It's funny y'all like this guy.

Nobody was closer to Epstein. He's all over the plane logs - went to the island innumerable times - defended Epstein in court and on TV - one of the girls even named him as her rapist two times.

And yet....you don't care

Hypocrisy in the dictionary just asked to list this as an example




Wow, go cook some Meth Walt, you are getting delusional due to your DT's.
Posted by deuceiswild
South La
Member since Nov 2007
4939 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:05 pm to
I think you do not know what hypocrisy means.

You know, Hitler said some things that were correct. So did the unabomber. So did countless other people who were also scum.

You're the type of person who contributes to the WWE aura of our national discourse. You shoot the messenger without regard to the message, and often times without even knowing the message.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:06 pm to
Did Dershowitz record that from Little St. James?
Posted by WaltWhite504
Member since Sep 2021
2108 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:08 pm to
He's a pedo.

I don't care his pedo opinion. He's just saying what he needs to say so the people who pull his strings don't release his pedo rape tape.
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
13956 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:09 pm to
You and your boyfriend Damone are both idiots
Posted by WaltWhite504
Member since Sep 2021
2108 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

You're the type of person who contributes to the WWE aura of our national discourse. You shoot the messenger without regard to the message, and often times without even knowing the message.


And y'all are the people on the deck of the Titanic trying to figure out how to fix the boat when you need to jump ship
Posted by Dirtyboro
Member since Jul 2014
717 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:10 pm to
All of this theatre is doubling down on trump’s support
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68054 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:11 pm to
Bruh, think about what you are saying. You don't think whatever mafia has that info wouldn't want to bury him for being pro-Trump the last year or two? He has said he basically lost all his friends defending Trump on a lot of the legal BS thrown at Trump the last few years.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 8:12 pm
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
32819 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

In this case they will likely have to prove that Trump knew or believed that he had lost the election when he made the statements he made.


Said this in my thread. It’s fricking crazy. They will still win even though they can’t prove (I don’t think) that he didn’t believe all those frickers telling him he lost.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:15 pm to
Trumpcucks are simping for Alan Dershowitz now
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

funny y'all like this guy.
it is not a question of whether one “likes“ Dershowitz. You either recognize that he is a brilliant constitutional scholar, are you do not.

If you do not, I question YOUR intelligence.

if you do not because you do not like his politics, doubly so.
This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 8:46 pm
Posted by 88Wildcat
Topeka, Ks
Member since Jul 2017
16984 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:30 pm to
If the trial takes place in Washington with this the judge the jury will convict Trump in under an hour. He may very well win an appeal but there is no chance he will be found innocent at this venue. The jury will have their minds made up the moment they enter the court room and they will not even listen to the evidence.
Posted by Marcus Aurelius
LA
Member since Oct 2020
3900 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:32 pm to
Most agree this is nonsense... just like NYC. Document case ... not so much.

Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
13148 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

The indictment is… marginal, to be polite.

any competent attorney can see that


Even a broken clock is right twice a day...have a VERY rare upvote
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Document is so strange that under its own rubric or logic, Jack Smith could be indicted. It goes after Trump for an alleged lie - but Jack Smith lied as well. He outlines Trump's Jan6 speech. He deliberately leaves out key words, about protesting peacefully, that keeps Trump's actions within the first amendment. Thus Jack Smith lied, left them out of the indictment, and under his own theory of the case that lies can be criminalized, Jack Smith can now be indicted.


Is there an incitement charge?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16212 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 8:57 pm to
Jack Smith Admitted to lying to the court about evidence.
quote:

Special counsel Jack Smith's team admitted to incorrectly claiming to have turned over evidence as required by law in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump.

quote:

"The Government’s representation at the July 18 hearing that all surveillance footage the Government had obtained pre-indictment had been produced was therefore incorrect,"
quote:

All CCTV footage obtained by the government has now been given to the defendants, according to Smith's team.

The so-called Brady rule requires prosecutors to disclose all evidence and information favorable to the defendant.


https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/jack-smiths-team-admits-incorrect-claim-about-evidence-trump-classified

His cases will fall apart or be thrown out.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32648 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

- Document is so strange that under its own rubric or logic, Jack Smith could be indicted. It goes after Trump for an alleged lie - but Jack Smith lied as well. He outlines Trump's Jan6 speech. He deliberately leaves out key words, about protesting peacefully, that keeps Trump's actions within the first amendment. Thus Jack Smith lied, left them out of the indictment, and under his own theory of the case that lies can be criminalized, Jack Smith can now be indicted.


Jfc Dersh has lost it shilling for clicks on Rumble.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 9:17 pm to
It’s as if he didn’t read the indictment. He has the maga brain worms.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
7115 posts
Posted on 8/2/23 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Decatur: Jfc Dersh has lost it


quote:

cwill: He has the maga brain worms.



I think I see the problem here


Dershowitz is a man of principles. Obviously this a completely foreign concept to you 2 fricking mongoloids.


The way that works—operating on principle (and logic, which y’all will also find baffling)—is you disregard political party, emotion, and even personal preference when determining a course of action or position.


Y’all should try it some time.


This post was edited on 8/2/23 at 9:56 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram