- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems plan to use the 14th amendment to disqualify Trump from taking office on Jan 6, 2025
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:33 am to bluestem75
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:33 am to bluestem75
quote:
I really think that they are going to be mocked, ridiculed, and ignored if that try that.
They’ll never get anywhere with that. Eventually it would end with SCOTUS ruling that there had been no conviction for sedition. And they can’t rush one through unless they can get a group of Republicans to vote for impeachment in the House, then conviction in the Senate.
0
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You're posting quotes from an article from February 2024.
I dont get your point. That is an election year.
Are you trying to say 8 months is archaic?
This is becoming the norm maybe. I see a bunch of posters saying it was yesterday and old hat, does not mean now, that was before.
Unless you were recorded or 'heard' saying things by only certain people of a certain political affiliation.
You're posting quotes from an article from February 2024.
I dont get your point. That is an election year.
Are you trying to say 8 months is archaic?
This is becoming the norm maybe. I see a bunch of posters saying it was yesterday and old hat, does not mean now, that was before.
Unless you were recorded or 'heard' saying things by only certain people of a certain political affiliation.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:35 am to themunch
quote:
This is becoming the norm maybe. I see a bunch of posters saying it was yesterday and old hat, does not mean now, that was before.
They said it in Feb, they said it this week.
THey haven't stopped saying it.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:36 am to themunch
quote:
This is becoming the norm maybe. I see a bunch of posters saying it was yesterday and old hat, does not mean now, that was before.
Unless you were recorded or 'heard' saying things by only certain people of a certain political affiliation.
Can y'all not read? The literal next line (that Rog left out and didn't address when he was spoon fed it)
quote:
The Supreme Court ruling on the issue was about a week later and shut this down.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
they said it this week.
Which major DEM said it this week?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do we have any recent evidence of this?
You think they've had a big change of heart about Trump? After everything you've seen over the last 8 years?
Don't be an idiot.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can y'all not read?
You cant. People have been telling you for two pages here that the discussion is real and you totally ignore it.
If this is sentiment within the opposition, you should take notice, theyre telling you what they believe.
They;ll do anything to stop a Republican from taking office.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:40 am to Flats
quote:
Don't be an idiot.
He's a progressive. He cannot find it within him to find fault in anti Democratic sentiment.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:40 am to Flats
quote:
You think they've had a big change of heart about Trump?
Not particularly, but their options are limited and they don't want to look stupid.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:40 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
So in summary, no, “the Dems” don’t plan to use the 14th amendment to disqualify Trump.
want to bet?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:41 am to JackieTreehorn
quote:
No wonder they are conducting practice congressional evacuations from the capitol this week.
From 5 weeks ago: #MuhInsurrection 2.0 - Lawmakers Plan for Possible 'Mass Casualty Event'
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:41 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
People have been telling you for two pages here that the discussion is real
And yet, no evidence was posted to support this, while I posted direct evidence to refute this.
quote:
and you totally ignore it.
No I asked you for examples.
quote:
theyre telling you what they believe.
quote:
“House Democrats are committed to certifying the election based on the results that emerge in terms of who the American people select to be the 47th president of the United States of America,” Jeffries said.
Clearly.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:41 am to L.A.
“I declare bankruptcy” energy lmao
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:42 am to moneyg
quote:
want to bet?
They can't. Their opportunity to pass a law to do it has passed.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And yet, no evidence was posted to support this,
Youve been shown direct quotes, Junior.
Do you need some mansplaining?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
See. Just like this. Thanks Jake 
You can call me munch or mike
You can call me munch or mike
This post was edited on 10/31/24 at 7:45 am
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not particularly, but their options are limited and they don't want to look stupid.
No shite; that's why it won't happen.
That says nothing about their desire for it to happen and what they might try with a more liberal court or if another favorable set of circumstances presented itself.
Gavin Newsome hasn't talked about wanting to be president recently, so following your "logic" he no longer wants to be president.
This post was edited on 10/31/24 at 7:46 am
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youve been shown direct quotes, Junior.
From February, before the USSC shut down these arguments.
Anything you know...recent?
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
Well if her plans were to go as expected they will loose their dividends and wealth. Only the rich can survive unrealized property tax gains and more. I dont think all of Congress is “rich” but I could be wrong. It would be interesting to see what middle class property owners would do.
Posted on 10/31/24 at 7:46 am to Flats
quote:
That says nothing about their desire for it to happen and what they might try with a more liberal court or if another favorable set of circumstances presented itself.
You're talking about literal multi-layered hypotheticals here.
quote:
Gavin Newsome hasn't talked about wanting to be president, so following your "logic" he no longer wants to be president.
I have a feeling he's been given a talk and understands it is no longer in his future. That's postulation, but I've called my shot on the post-election movement of the DEM party.
Page 4 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News