Started By
Message

re: Democrats’ ‘Decoy Dan’ plot to oust Sen. Dan Sullivan

Posted on 8/25/26 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by JellyRoll
Member since Apr 2024
2249 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10440 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

What is your opinion of Darlene Graham Nordone using her maiden name?


That is a misdirection for political purposes. Not the end of the world. Politicians, especially ones relying on the merits of others, tend to do that.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11776 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Half of this board or more would support DEI and abortion if trump came out for it tomorrow.


That's a hypothetical. The reality is that Trump has removed DEI from the federal government and is fighting it in universities while the other half of the board refuses to acknowledge it.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38447 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Tell us why this was done. Are you not curious?

It was obviously done for confusion purposes.

I just said that RCV makes it more unlikely to be successful, which is the opposite of what the article implied
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18665 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

and the other half would oppose free beer if Donald Trump gave it to them What is the fricking difference? that YOU are in the second half?
nothing is free from the government. And Ive voted for Trump 3 times. The only elections I’ve ever been in old enough to vote in. So I’ve never casted a vote for president for anyone not named Donald J Trump!
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
60344 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Again, mindless tribalism


Typical
Liberal
Projection
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
60344 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

your wasting your breath. Half of this board or more would support DEI and abortion if trump came out for it tomorrow.


bullshite. Such a simpleton take.
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
605 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:32 pm to
SMH- dude, these two things are totally different. You’re making a dishonest argument and you know it
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10440 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

SMH- dude, these two things are totally different. You’re making a dishonest argument and you know it


Other than the Alaska scheme benefits the Democrats and the South Carolina scheme benefits a closeted Democrat, I think they are both designed to influence the outcome of an election.

I hope both fail.

The only reason anyone thinks she is a conservative is because President Trump supports her (and maybe that's a good enough reason). But, if you trust the President's judgment of her political merits, here is his opinion of what her last name is:


This post was edited on 8/25/26 at 3:52 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
45341 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 2:59 pm to
S is for SUPERIOR!
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
605 posts
Posted on 8/25/26 at 5:04 pm to
Using your maiden name to win an election is not all that uncommon, nor is there anything nefarious about it. However, running a candidate with the same exact last name as the incumbent (except the middle initial, which the guy tried to change to match the incumbent), is the epitome of scumminess and pretty much summarizes the Democrat party.

The last thing we need in office is another Graham, but to equate these two things is pretty asinine
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram