- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Democrats consider masking identity of Whistleblower
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:31 pm
quote:I saw this about 20 minutes ago on Mark Levin's show on Fox News. This was Oct 7th, so they may have changed their minds but I feel like I am taking crazy pills this is so ludicrous. The dems are the USSR while they accuse Trump, Jill Stein and Tulsi of what they are guilty of...
“House Democrats eager to protect a whistleblower who raised alarms over President Trump pressuring a foreign leader to investigate a political rival are considering testimony at a remote location and possibly obscuring the individual’s appearance and voice — extraordinary moves to prevent Trump’s congressional allies from revealing the identity,” the Washington Post reports.
“Democratic investigators are concerned that without such rare precautions, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee could learn and then leak the identity of the whistleblower, who has agreed to answer questions before the intelligence committees in both the House and Senate.”
LINK
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 6:33 pm
15
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:34 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Democrats consider masking identity of Whistleblower
So let me think through this. We are supposed to remove an elected President based on testimony from an anonymous source? It's about time for some intrepid reporters and sleuths to identify who this person is. They will be found out. Somebody has to be smart enough to figure it out.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:35 pm to cajunangelle
Didn't this come out last week?
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:36 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
He is NOT a whistleblower. Not covered by the law and a warrant should be issued for him as a leaker.
Anyone harboring him should be cuffed and stuffed for obstruction. They want a war? Let's give them one.
Anyone harboring him should be cuffed and stuffed for obstruction. They want a war? Let's give them one.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:38 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
Many years ago I used to consider this site middle of the road. The first current article is 'walls are closing in on Trump' type of article we have heard for years.
Taegan Goddard's Political Wire
Taegan Goddard's Political Wire
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:40 pm to cajunangelle
November 3, 2020. This will be when their hand gets slapped like a petulant child. It's a tough pride pill to swallow until then, but satisfaction will be realized at that time.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:40 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The dems are the USSR while they accuse Trump, Jill Stein and Tulsi of what they are guilty of...
Even Tic Tok says that. It's true.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:43 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
House Democrats eager to protect a whistleblower who raised alarms over President Trump pressuring a foreign leader to investigate a political rival are considering testimony at a remote location and possibly obscuring the individual’s appearance and voice — extraordinary moves to prevent Trump’s congressional allies from revealing the identity,” the Washington Post reports
Why is it that everything Trump does is leaked to the media in short order, but we still don’t know who the WB is?
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:43 pm to Lynyrd
wouldnt republicans have to be there to be able to ask questions as well. Or are the dems just going to be the only ones to ask questions.
The Repubs should hire Trey Gawdy as their lawyers to help like them dems have and demand under Nadler's rules that Trey gets time to question.
The Repubs should hire Trey Gawdy as their lawyers to help like them dems have and demand under Nadler's rules that Trey gets time to question.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:45 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The first current article is 'walls are closing in on Trump' type of article we have heard for years.
I live in Texas and supported Ted Cruz. I was not stupid enough to choose Hillary over Trump despite his quirks. So how and the hell am I supposed to then support Elizabeth Warren? I'll hold my nose and vote for the right side.
I do not disagree with the article. He has to be feeling pressure. If he is weakened it is because dims made him weak and it is not good for this country. Fast forward four to eight years and I hope democrat leadership is retired because of infirmity or six feet under. This shite will pass one way or the other.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:45 pm to cajunangelle
What a bunch of mentally ill fricktards.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:47 pm to cajunangelle
Democrats love their deceptive tactics dont they? Always scheming behind closed doors, looking for the next big lie to feed their media accomplices.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:50 pm to AubieinNC2009
quote:
The Repubs should hire Trey Gawdy as their lawyer
He's on Trump's payroll now in dealing with this. He accepted the position a week or two ago.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:51 pm to AubieinNC2009
quote:
wouldnt republicans have to be there to be able to ask questions as well. Or are the dems just going to be the only ones to ask questions.
Of course this has been hashed out at length here on the board, and there is still no definitive "once and for all" on the subject, but it appears that until Pelosi orders an official vote on impeachment inquiry, the Dems apparently have the ability to investigate and question witnesses without traditional allowances of the opposing party to participate.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:54 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
WB ready to say orange man bad, orange man Russian asset.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 6:56 pm to Lynyrd
No, Gowdy isn't going to be Trump's lawyer. He would have to wait for Jan. because of some lobbyists clause so it isn't happening.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 7:59 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
It’s a fking sham. Even ppl in witness protection have to show up to court and testify.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 8:23 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
“House Democrats eager to protect a whistleblower who raised alarms over President Trump pressuring a foreign leader to investigate a political rival are considering testimony at a remote location and possibly obscuring the individual’s appearance and voice — extraordinary moves to prevent Trump’s congressional allies from revealing the identity,” the Washington Post reports.
Let's call it what it is. The dems are protecting a spy within the IC. This person leaked a classified phone call between the US prez and the Ukranian prez.
Trump did nothing wrong on the call. The person who leaked the phone call info should go to prison for leaking classified info and spying on Trump.
Posted on 10/19/19 at 8:26 pm to djmicrobe
Has it even been asserted that this person is still employed with the federal government? If not, and of course the Dem leadership would know this despite what they've tried to claim, then one of the main if not the main WB concerns is moot....threat of being fired.
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 8:32 pm
Posted on 10/19/19 at 8:29 pm to cajunangelle
Translation: the leaker is so obviously partisan that it would be obvious he isn't a whistleblower if people were to learn his identity.
This post was edited on 10/19/19 at 8:30 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News