Started By
Message
locked post

Death Row in Arkansas--The State Is Rushing to Use Up Its Expiring Lethal Injection Drug

Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:45 pm
Posted by I B Freeman
Member since Oct 2009
27843 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:45 pm
This is really a powerful column.

I have waffled back and forth on the death penalty. There are some real scum that should die but should the state be trusted--should some of these juries be trusted--to decide who dies and who does not?

One point that comes to my mind is if the death penalty is abolished will anybody help those wrongly convicted but are only sentence to life? Is that as glamorous for the lawyers?

Anyway this is interesting take on what Arkansas is doing.

LINK

quote:

This State Is Rushing to Use Up Its Expiring Lethal Injection Drugs

Damien Echols
Damien Echols

Tuesday, April 25, 2017


Earlier this month, Governor Asa Hutchinson issued execution dates for eight men on death row, all to be carried out over the course of 10 days. He didn’t care that there’s a chance at least two of them may be innocent, or that several others suffer mental disabilities that cross the line into the realm of handicaps. None of that meant anything to those trying with all their might to push these executions through. The mindset behind these rapid fire executions should scare all Americans. But perhaps one of the scariest parts, for me, is knowing I could have been the ninth man on the state’s death list.

Most people take a stance on the death penalty based on things they’ve read in the newspaper, saw on television, or by swallowing the hubris spewed by politicians eager to scare you into voting for them. Mine is not. My views on the death penalty are based on the fact that I spent over 18 years looking at the system from the inside, waiting for the state to murder me for a crime I did not commit. While awaiting execution at the hands of the state, I grew to know these men — the eight Hutchinson is rushing to kill — on a personal, face-to-face basis. They were my companions on a journey through hell.

The men scheduled to be executed were my companions on a journey through hell.
The state would have you believe that these men are irredeemably evil, that they are ravenous monsters bent on bloodshed, like creatures out of a horror movie. They are not. The men that local politicians are foaming at the mouth to kill showed me more kindness and simple humanity than anyone trying to execute them ever did. In fact, if not for one of them, Don Davis, I’d probably not have made it out of prison alive. He stood by my side and watched my back against sadistic prison guards who would have beaten me to death without a second thought.

Don is guilty. He’ll be the first to tell you that he’s guilty, and he makes no excuses for his actions 25 years ago. I once watched him break down crying because the guilt from what he’d done decades before was still eating him alive. No, despite the propaganda local officials are spreading to convince fear-stricken news-watchers how “tough on crime” they are, it’s not monsters they’re trying to kill — they are insane, mentally handicapped, and remorseful men.

The state of Arkansas hasn’t carried out an execution in over a decade. So why the sudden, blood-crazed rush to carry out as many as possible? For one reason: the supply of drugs they use to carry out state-sanctioned murder are about to expire. You read that correctly. The rush of executions is so that the state can use up all of its lethal injection drugs before they go as sour as an old carton of milk.

Arkansas is currently embroiled in legal challenges, due to the fact that the company who makes one of these lethal drugs is suing for its return. They claim that Arkansas officials misled them about what the drugs were going to be used for, and they don’t want their product being used to kill people. Arkansas has so far refused to return the drug.

Instead, on the night of April 20th, they want to use these ill-gotten chemicals to kill a man who may very well be innocent.

Ignoring Inconvenient Evidence

One of the men scheduled to be executed is Ledell Lee. There is DNA evidence in his case, hair found at the crime scene, which the state has refused to test. A judge ruled that the DNA, which could exonerate him, should never be tested.

Keep in mind that in the history of the state of Arkansas, no one on death row has ever been exonerated. Local politicians maintain they have never made a mistake, that the system is infallible, and that they have never sentenced an innocent man to die. I know this is false, because for 18 years I sat on Arkansas’ death row and waited on the state to murder me for something I didn’t do. Even after DNA testing was completed in my case, which excluded me from the crime scene, I sat on death row for two more years as the state wrestled endlessly to cover it up and kill me.

In the history of the state of Arkansas, no one on death row has ever been exonerated.
In the end, rather than take my chances in a legal system that was as rotten as a bad tooth, I took an Alford Plea. An Alford Plea is a paradox — it means you get to maintain your innocence, even as you accept a guilty plea. It makes no sense to anyone capable of logical thinking, and the only reason it exists is so the state can’t be held accountable for sentencing an innocent person to death. Part of this plea deal was that I could never sue the state of Arkansas for what they had done to me. Why would I take such a deal? Because I knew that if I didn’t, I’d eventually be right where Ledell Lee is now — looking into the face of death, despite having evidence that would have gained us exoneration in a less corrupt forum.

I might not be able to sue the state that took 18 years of my life, but I can share my experiences to counter the fear tactics Arkansas has used to justify their killing spree to the public. There are monsters in this story, that is certain — but as it turns out, some of them are our elected officials. If you don’t think a drug’s expiration date should be the deciding factor in whether someone deserves to die without a fair trial, you should contact Governor Hutchinson here.

Update (4/21/17): Last night, Ledell Lee was executed by the state of Arkansas. Nina Morrison, a lawyer for Mr. Lee who spent the evening arguing for a stay, released a statement condemning the decision. “Arkansas’s decision to rush through the execution of Mr. Lee just because its supply of lethal drugs are expiring at the end of the month denied him the opportunity to conduct DNA testing that could have proven his innocence.”


This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 7:51 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98470 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:46 pm to
Oh well...
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9313 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:55 pm to
Use it up. Exterminate as many killers as you can before it goes bad.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Don is guilty. He’ll be the first to tell you that he’s guilty, and he makes no excuses for his actions 25 years ago


Then Don deserves to die according to law. I have absolutely no problem with this one.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64195 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:56 pm to
Arky.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41644 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:58 pm to
Lead doesn't expire.
Posted by PuntBamaPunt
Member since Nov 2010
10070 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 7:59 pm to
Don't agree with the death penalty but if it happens just use a rope or a bullet.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:00 pm to
I can't think of anything worse than being convicted of a serious crime you didn't commit, whether for life or death row.

Having said that people can do terrible things and still show "kindness and simple humanity" among peers. I don't necessarily grieve for the fate of someone actually guilty of murder in cold blood or whatever gets you on death row these days. I wouldn't for myself if I crossed that line either.

If there is a chance that the threat of the death penalty prevents even one murder I am not against it. You crossed a line and I won't justify your life while the innocent one you took is gone forever. I haven't seen any research on it's effectiveness as a deterrent though.
But I also think if there is any reasonable doubt the inmate is 100% innocent death should be postponed, but then again technically you don't go to prison if it's beyond a reasonable doubt.
This post was edited on 4/25/17 at 8:02 pm
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4312 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:01 pm to
Damien Echols is probably guilty... he's also a known liar. He's a bad messenger for this cause.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Don is guilty. He’ll be the first to tell you that he’s guilty, and he makes no excuses for his actions 25 years ago. I once watched him break down crying because the guilt from what he’d done decades before was still eating him alive.

BS, dude was crying because he was caught and now has to pay the price
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:13 pm to
The death penalty as currently practiced is a disgrace. If we could have a firing squad or some shite then fine, but what we have now isn't working. I'd vote to end it.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38741 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Don't agree with the death penalty but if it happens just use a rope or a bullet.



Rope with current fatties in our country equals decapitation
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4312 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

but what we have now isn't working.


How so?
Posted by LSUFAN2005
Member since Aug 2004
1726 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:35 pm to
Why should we actually care if they are mentally handicapped when they committed such a heinous act?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
57835 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

rapid fire executions



One was convicted of murder in 1994 and the other in 1995. Yeah, rapid fire!
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68039 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

The state would have you believe that these men are irredeemably evil, that they are ravenous monsters bent on bloodshed, like creatures out of a horror movie. They are not.


What an idiot.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68039 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

Why should we actually care if they are mentally handicapped when they committed such a heinous act?


They're not. It's simply a friend conjuring an excuse.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

The state would have you believe that these men are irredeemably evil, that they are ravenous monsters bent on bloodshed, like creatures out of a horror movie. They are not. The men that local politicians are foaming at the mouth to kill showed me more kindness and simple humanity than anyone trying to execute them ever did.


quote:

despite the propaganda local officials are spreading to convince fear-stricken news-watchers how “tough on crime” they are, it’s not monsters they’re trying to kill — they are insane, mentally handicapped, and remorseful men.



It doesn't matter how reformed or well behaved they are in prison, when they killed brutalized and killed their victims in cold blood or pure rage, they committed a crime that is morally unforgivable, a moral obscenity to society that can never be repaired and forever altered the lives of an innocent family and friends against their own will. The ultimate crime deserves only one thing, the ultimate punishment and its the responsibility of the state to carry out that solemn duty.

Vouching for the inmates character is a shitty argument and has no place in the debate over the merits of the death penalty.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

but what we have now isn't working.


worked 3 times this week
Posted by Maytheporkbewithyou
Member since Aug 2016
12590 posts
Posted on 4/25/17 at 10:23 pm to
Damien Echols is obviously going to be really biased on this. To be honest, though, I don't really care what his opinion is. There is no real question of guilt by these murderers. They deserve to be put to death and the state has finally found the testicle to do it again. Death penalty should only be handed down and executions in a clear cut case and of these cases have been.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram