- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DC grand jury declines to indict woman accused of threatening Trump onlin
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:12 pm
A Washington, D.C. grand jury declined to indict an Indiana woman accused of threatening President Trump’s life on social media, building upon a series of criminal dismissals from citizen jurors in recent weeks.
Nathalie Rose Jones was charged with threatening to take the life of, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon the president of the United States and transmitting in interstate commerce communications.
“A grand jury has now found no probable cause to indict Ms. Jones on the charged offenses,” her team wrote.
Jones, 50, suffers from schizophrenia and has ramped up her criticism of the Trump administration in recent months after attending protests in Washington.
“I literally told FBI in five states today that I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea…” Jones wrote in an Aug. 6 post on her Facebook page.
“This regime has to go. The whole administration,” she told NewsNation in an Aug. 16 interview.
LINK
Nathalie Rose Jones was charged with threatening to take the life of, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm upon the president of the United States and transmitting in interstate commerce communications.
“A grand jury has now found no probable cause to indict Ms. Jones on the charged offenses,” her team wrote.
Jones, 50, suffers from schizophrenia and has ramped up her criticism of the Trump administration in recent months after attending protests in Washington.
“I literally told FBI in five states today that I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS by disemboweling him and cutting out his trachea…” Jones wrote in an Aug. 6 post on her Facebook page.
“This regime has to go. The whole administration,” she told NewsNation in an Aug. 16 interview.
LINK
10
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:13 pm to Jbird
D.C. grand jury
---Enough said.
---Enough said.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:14 pm to ItzMe1972
If it was someone saying the same thing about biden 3 years ago, they would already be in prison awaiting trial.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:15 pm to Jbird
quote:
suffers from schizophrenia
Grooming her for the next assassination attempt
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:25 pm to Jbird
Now just imagine if she said that about 44.
Just imagine that...
Just imagine that...
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:25 pm to Jbird
quote:
Indiana woman
Indict her in fricking Indiana where she made the fricking threat! Why do we make this so difficult?
quote:
literally told FBI in five states today that I am willing to sacrificially kill this POTUS
That’s five states to charge her in
Posted on 9/2/25 at 2:41 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
DC is just another democrat filled shite hole.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:02 pm to Jbird
Does it matter? Boasberg already set her loose!
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:20 pm to Jbird
The old hag should just die
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:27 pm to Jbird
Can they not be charged by bill???
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:34 pm to Jbird
Trump and friends need to rearrange the DC population so that 90% aren't dems.
Disperse the concentration of federal employees by moving the bureaucracies and create incentives to move the poor elsewhere.
Perhaps a law or amendment that requires grand juries and trials to take place an unbiased location.
6th Amendment
Disperse the concentration of federal employees by moving the bureaucracies and create incentives to move the poor elsewhere.
Perhaps a law or amendment that requires grand juries and trials to take place an unbiased location.
6th Amendment
quote:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:36 pm to Jbird
Ummm...
Why was she not brought before an Indiana federal grand jury?
quote:
Indiana woman
Why was she not brought before an Indiana federal grand jury?
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:38 pm to udtiger
I believe her issues started while protesting in DC.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:40 pm to udtiger
quote:
Why was she not brought before an Indiana federal grand jury?
It's becoming so mind-numbing I have to start asking questions and connecting dots, and wondering if they're failing on purpose publicly in DC so they can try to argue why they need a different venue in other cases that should be in DC (like the GTOE).
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:40 pm to Jbird
Eliminate home rule, completely, and return all district management to Congress, as it should be.
Posted on 9/2/25 at 3:45 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Good idea and entirely constitutional.
6th Amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
quote:
Indict her in fricking Indiana where she made the fricking threat! Why do we make this so difficult?
6th Amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News