- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: David Sacks idea: auction off public licenses, potentially kicking ABC/CBS/NBC to cable
Posted on 10/29/24 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/29/24 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The government can't just change the game at halftime and leave them holding the bag.
Of course it can.
The negotiated contracts I’m sure have a force majeure clause.
1
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This would require epic due process due to the property rights concerned.
Dude, it's 2024. Why are you going on about due process and laws. You must be a boomer.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:15 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Why are you going on about due process and laws.
I never took you for a BLM type.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never took you for a BLM type.
Well, that's one thing you've been right about.
There's a difference between recognizing the recent (relative) lawlessness of fedgov and advocating for it.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:23 pm to David_DJS
Who was denied due process? 
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:25 pm to GeneralLee
Would be awesome. And the reaction by the House and Senate?
Immediate Impeachment!
Immediate Impeachment!
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who was denied due process?
At the top of the list are college students accused of sexual assault/harassment. Somewhere on the list are some J6'ers.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:33 pm to David_DJS
quote:
At the top of the list are college students accused of sexual assault/harassment
I agree, but in the past. That's largely been solved.
quote:
Somewhere on the list are some J6'ers.
I don't know of any who were denied due process.
Now some did fall on the wrong side of the bail policies their fans prefer, which is a conundrum for internal consistency, but not for due process.
This post was edited on 10/29/24 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I agree, but in the past
What are the odds that a fedgov willing to perpetrate something so egregious as what was done on campuses is unwilling to do it elsewhere? Do you believe it was just some crazy outlier/blip?
quote:
Now some did fall on the wrong side of the bail policies their fans prefer, which is a conundrum for internal consistency, but not for due process.
Are you telling me it's consistent with due process to be holed up for a year without being charged or a trial in sight? Regardless of what the law allows, IMO that's inconsistent with the principle of due process.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:46 pm to David_DJS
quote:
a fedgov willing to perpetrate something so egregious as what was done on campuses i
Fedgov didn't do shite in those examples. The individual schools did.
quote:
Do you believe it was just some crazy outlier/blip?
I think the schools took the guidance they were given and the societal culture of the time regarding sexual assault and created a moral panic.
quote:
Are you telling me it's consistent with due process to be holed up for a year without being charged or a trial in sight?
The very reason those trials were delayed was due process. Find me some example of someone who've been sitting over a year where the delay was not caused by motion practice, appeals, and continuances (aka, due process) of the Defendant.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:55 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
If you want the government to censure content--then just say so. I'm not a proponent, even if I don't like or agree with the content.
I'm not giving any validity to the proposal in the OP. Don't confuse the debate over terminologies with any agreement with the idea.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 1:58 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Love Sacks
Same. Also is there more TDS ridden cuck than j-cal.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 2:10 pm to TrueTiger
quote:The future is with the new, upcoming Over-The-Air broadcast standard, ATSC 3.0, which will be more powerful, and with better modulation, allowing broadcasters to make available not only their own channel in 4k UHD in HDR and Dolby Vision, but also with premium Atmos sound, and multiplexing to deliver lots of streaming channels AND high bandwidth Internet services.
The future is probably wireless streaming over private cellular networks.
ATSC 3.0
The FCC has to approve it, set the timeline and auction off the airspace, then manufacturers will need to add the reception devices and antenna into their products
As I mentioned above, it will be robust, and rooftop or other antennas should not be necessary.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 2:12 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Very few people still use antennas and even allowing for that there is plenty of space for over the air crap
Everyone I know that primarily streams has a hd antenna myself included. You can get fantastic often superior picture.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 2:42 pm to St Augustine
quote:This is true
Everyone I know that primarily streams has a hd antenna myself included. You can get fantastic often superior picture.
What isn't true is that many people don't realize that in an HOA community that a TV antenna can be installed outside on the roof, not inside the attic, in spite of any HOA rules that prohibit it or try to restrict placement. FCC regulations allow you to go up to 12' above the top of the peak roofline without having to get a permit from local governing entities, but higher is allowed if local governments allow it, whether they require a permit or not.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Fedgov didn't do shite in those examples. The individual schools did.
October 2022
College students investigated for sexual harassment or assault will once again be stripped of due process, thanks to new regulations released by the U.S. Department of Education in June.
The new rules, which apply to investigations under Title IX, part of a federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, rescind rules crafted and implemented by former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos during the Trump administration. They mark the return of the "single investigator model," which empowers a single college administrator to investigate, judge, and sanction alleged misconduct.
The Biden administration regulations also require schools to apply a "preponderance of the evidence" standard when investigating complaints if they do not use a clear-and-convincing or higher standard of evidence in all other comparable hearings*. Under that standard, investigators must find an accused student guilty if they conclude it is more than 50 percent likely that the allegations are true. Under the DeVos regulations, by contrast, universities needed "clear and convincing evidence" to punish an accused student.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 3:59 pm to David_DJS
quote:
The individual schools did.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 4:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The individual schools did.
I'm not following your point here.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 4:53 pm to VOR
quote:
Yay. Screw the free press! The Founders would be happy, I’m sure.
You can produce whatever media you want to now. Why do I as a taxpayer have to subsidize NPR who hates my guts?
Posted on 10/29/24 at 4:57 pm to GeneralLee
LOVE this... Frick em all.
Next do NGO's and Tax exempt companies
Next do NGO's and Tax exempt companies
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News