- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DACA reaches the Supreme Court
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:53 am
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:53 am
The program legality will depend on how “ LINKPseudo-conservative” Robert votes
12
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:55 am to Northwestern tiger
A sitting President can either rescind the EO of a previous President, or he cannot.
A sitting President can either make immutable law without Congress, or he cannot.
It's as simple as that.
A sitting President can either make immutable law without Congress, or he cannot.
It's as simple as that.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:56 am to udtiger
Exactly, this shouldn’t be a long case
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:57 am to Northwestern tiger
This may go against us because with RBG being dead she gets to vote twice. It's the democrat way
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:57 am to udtiger
I predict Robert will side with the progressives
Posted on 11/12/19 at 6:59 am to FredBear
quote:And it's also The Democrat Way to change the rules, move the goalposts, deny deny deny, obstruct, throw stuff,...
This may go against us because with RBG being dead she gets to vote twice. It's the democrat way
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:08 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
I predict Robert will side with the progressives
If he does this, he establishes a monarchy. Trump can go hog wild with EOs and tell SCOTUS to frick themselves.
He may want to avoid the Court being perceived as political, but he's already on thin ice after his last second Obamacare flip.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:11 am to udtiger
quote:
A sitting President can either rescind the EO of a previous President, or he cannot.
A sitting President can either make immutable law without Congress, or he cannot.
It's as simple as that.
This, cannot wait to see Roberts rationale if this stays in place.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:14 am to udtiger
This should be the entire brief submitted by the solicitor general.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:15 am to America First
quote:
If they rule against the president
They should be impeached. Jug Ears had no authority to do it in the first place.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:15 am to Northwestern tiger
This shite went to the SC once already...It's a dead freaking horse and i'm tired of seeing the liberals beat it.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:18 am to Crimson Wraith
They should be impeached. Jug Ears had no authority to do it in the first place.
And admitted it.
And admitted it.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:19 am to Northwestern tiger
Justice Roberts will let us down.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:23 am to udtiger
List heard the CBS reporter say that Trump needs to explain his opposition to DACA and he could rescind it.
Da fuq?
According to whom?
The Constitution? Must be in one of the non-existent footnotes.
Administrative Procedures Act?
Notwithstanding DACA is illegal on its face (this, any regs/rules would be null), that would be a fricking unconstitutional infringement on separation of powers.
Da fuq?
According to whom?
The Constitution? Must be in one of the non-existent footnotes.
Administrative Procedures Act?
Notwithstanding DACA is illegal on its face (this, any regs/rules would be null), that would be a fricking unconstitutional infringement on separation of powers.
This post was edited on 11/12/19 at 7:47 am
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:36 am to Northwestern tiger
Hell Trump tried to get a DACA deal done and the Dems said no. frick them.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:37 am to udtiger
This is a chance for the Judiciary to limit the overreach the Executive Branch has been using for too many years.
Even with Roberts, this should be a win.
Even with Roberts, this should be a win.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:37 am to udtiger
quote:
A sitting President can either rescind the EO of a previous President, or he cannot.
What can be done by EO can obviously be undone by EO, can it not? I mean, how could it be any simpler than that?
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:42 am to udtiger
If a succeeding president cannot rescind EOs of his predecessor, why do we need the legislative branch? The president can simply make law by decree.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:44 am to Bourre
quote:
Exactly, this shouldn’t be a long case
The vote SHOULD be 9-0, but you know Kagan, RBG, and the Wise Latina will vote to uphold BHO's EO. Breyer is 50/50, and Roberts is the wild card.
Posted on 11/12/19 at 7:47 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
This should be a slam dunk... Are they hearing the content of the EO or just the authority to impose and undo an EO?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News