Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Consumer advocates: Supreme Court climate case could ‘rewrite’ American economy

Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:07 pm
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4369 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:07 pm
Consumer advocates: Supreme Court climate case could ‘rewrite’ American economy



(The Center Square) – The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case on Monday that could “rewrite” the future of American energy production, legal analysts said.

Justices on the nation’s highest court will hear arguments in Suncor v. Boulder, a case to determine whether state and local governments can use nuisance laws to seek billions of dollars in damages from energy companies.

State nuisance laws are typically used to resolve disputes between neighbors. In most cases, individuals argue that certain activity negatively affects property value. In the case before the high court, government officials in Boulder, Colorado, argued that energy companies Suncor and ExxonMobil contributed to climate change by harvesting oil and natural gas resources.

“They will get an order telling energy producers to stop making oil and gas and then they will get billions of dollars to fund green initiatives to undo the effects of climate change,” said O.H. Skinner, executive director of the Alliance for Consumers.

He pointed to policies during the Biden administration where energy production was strictly regulated. Skinner warned the court would deal a sweeping blow to energy companies if it allows the lawsuit to move forward.

“They could end up with an order that will rewrite the American economy,” Skinner said.

Former Alaska Attorney General Steve Cox said the court’s ruling would have a drastic impact on how natural resources are gathered in Alaska. He said Alaska’s oil, gas, copper, gold and silver reserves would be fiercely regulated if justices on the high court agreed with Boulder, Colorado.

“If these tort lawyers are able to bankrupt the oil and gas industry, you can bankrupt Alaska as a result,” Cox said.

LINK
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
30252 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:10 pm to
Those "consumer advocates" who are paid by the Chinese government better start prepping for a rewrite of their idealistic view of the American economy.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
83335 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:10 pm to
It would set a terrible precedent.

Nuisance being defined this broadly would allow unlimited claims against every possible entity.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118260 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:49 pm to
Oh come on, don't you want to pay an extra $1K a month for electricity if it saves the planet?
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
664 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:52 pm to
Lawyers will be the downfall of America
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7969 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:58 pm to
I believe this is the case Alito revised himself from. If the decision is 4-4, the ruling of the state court will stand. I have not read any of the briefs or rulings, but I cannot imagine the tort of nuisance being defined so broadly as to allow one state to set energy policy for the whole country via a tort suit. How is this suit not preempted by federal law?
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
10445 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

In the case before the high court, government officials in Boulder, Colorado, argued that energy companies Suncor and ExxonMobil contributed to climate change by harvesting oil and natural gas resources.


F these people.
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Vero Beach, FL
Member since Jan 2005
28427 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:07 pm to
They should just say, "Fine. We will leave Boulder. We will not drill or sell oil and gas in Boulder."
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
25235 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Those "consumer advocates" who are paid by the Chinese government better start prepping for a rewrite of their idealistic view of the American economy.

I’d bet some of this goes back to USAID.
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
436 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:36 pm to
They should demand states guarantee in writing that they are immune from prosecution and, if they can't get this immediately cease and desist operations.
Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
3945 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 5:42 pm to
Maybe for now it would be Boulder but the entire state would end up joining and then good luck.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram