- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CONFIRMED:Broward Co. Sheriff's Employees Fired for Negligence during Parkland HS Shooting
Posted on 6/4/19 at 5:46 pm to Tony Tiger89
Posted on 6/4/19 at 5:46 pm to Tony Tiger89
As a patriot I'll allow you to practice on me before you slap him in the mouth
0
Posted on 6/4/19 at 5:47 pm to antibarner
quote:That's next. These two will sing that the Sheriff gave them stand-down orders.
Cuff that sorry sheriff too
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:12 pm to GAFF
quote:
He took an oath (and a paycheck) that he would serve and protect the community.
Link to oath?
While I agree if he perjured himself he should be charged. And he deserves ridicule and being ousted from L.E. but charging him for negligence is a stretch and will not hold up.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:17 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
I'm torn here.
You shouldn't be. Indictments have come for two of those in that long line you mention.
It makes sense to be pissed if someone escapes justice, but it makes no sense to not be happy that justice might be served up to those two policeman.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:22 pm to theenemy
quote:It will hold up long enough for him to spill the beans on the Sheriff. If he's chicken-shite enough to stand idly by while gunfire rains on his students, he's chicken-shite enough to insta-flip on the Sheriff (and rightly so).
charging him for negligence is a stretch and will not hold up.
Pretty clear that the Sheriff is the target here. The prosecutor needs corroborating witnesses- now he has them.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 6:26 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
It will hold up long enough for him to spill the beans on the Sheriff. If he's chicken-shite enough to stand idly by while gunfire rains on his students, he's chicken-shite enough to insta-flip on the Sheriff (and rightly so).
Ok so just so we are on the same page....
You support weak charges on someone just for the sake of putting pressure on them.
Sounds real FBIish
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:08 pm to troyt37
No. There is no difference. I've been called off a " normal" call to respond to a "man with a gun" call. There is a priority put on calls that involve a gun and all other calls get bumped because of them.
If I stayed on a call when there was a "man with a gun" call, you can bet your arse that I'm gonna have a not so pleasant meeting with the Sheriff.
Be it a school, grocery store, nursing home, bank, whatever...that "man with a gun" call takes priority.
If I stayed on a call when there was a "man with a gun" call, you can bet your arse that I'm gonna have a not so pleasant meeting with the Sheriff.
Be it a school, grocery store, nursing home, bank, whatever...that "man with a gun" call takes priority.
This post was edited on 6/4/19 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:15 pm to LSUwag
quote:
The Supreme Court has ruled that officers have no requirement to protect. I don’t see how most of these charges hold up in court. Possibly the perjury charge which is a misdemeanor.
About time they charged him, but I don’t understand how these charges are going to apply. The jury probably won’t really care in the end, and most likely send this guy away.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:22 pm to jrodLSUke
Now arrest the other 4 pussies chilling outside the school and their Janos Slynt of a sheriff and publicly hang them after a few months of being constantly shamed by the media at large. I’m typically against hangings, but we need to make an example of these pussies to other cops on what will happen to them if they don’t charge into the line of fire and do their fricking job.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 7:53 pm to TidenUP
quote:
No. There is no difference. I've been called off a " normal" call to respond to a "man with a gun" call. There is a priority put on calls that involve a gun and all other calls get bumped because of them.
If I stayed on a call when there was a "man with a gun" call, you can bet your arse that I'm gonna have a not so pleasant meeting with the Sheriff.
Be it a school, grocery store, nursing home, bank, whatever...that "man with a gun" call takes priority.
You’re misunderstanding again. Someone is popping off rounds in a grocery store, and someone is popping off rounds in an elementary school. You’re going to tell me police response will be the same? You can, but I won’t believe you if you do. Nor do I think it should be.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:02 pm to troyt37
Simultaneously? The patrol force and on duty force would be split, yes. Active shooter at a grocery? All units converge. School shooting? All units converge.
Shots fired on ANY shift results in all units responding and any off-duty deputies are responding.
Shots fired on ANY shift results in all units responding and any off-duty deputies are responding.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:09 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
this makes me uncomfortable. If we start imposing criminal liability on cops for failure to put their life on the line, you think any decent person would want to be a cop?
I do think decent folks will still be cops.
And if you're the only armed person who's job it is to protect the softest of soft targets, dam right you better be prepared to risk your life to stop a massacre. If he is afraid to confront danger, he had no business being the only line of defense for a dam school. Parkland would literally be no worse off if they didn't have an armed guard at all.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:11 pm to VoxDawg
Great news. 
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:12 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
If we start imposing criminal liability on cops for failure to put their life on the line, you think any decent person would want to be a cop?
He was the school resource officer. His job is literally to protect the students at the school.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:12 pm to WorkinDawg
A lot of SROs are Correctional officers who graduated a POST Academy and want to get out of Corrections. Not saying they ain't up to it, but a lot look at it as being their own boss.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:17 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
I do think decent folks will still be cops.
They will still be cops...but departments will take measures to protect themselves and officers.
You would see departments take on less responsibility to protect themselves.....like no officers assigned to schools.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:20 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
He was the school resource officer. His job is literally to protect the students at the school.
True....but is failure at your job against the law.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:21 pm to theenemy
It is when your job is titled "Law Enforcement".
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:23 pm to theenemy
quote:
is failure at your job against the law.
Can’t refuse to provide care to a sick person with a contagious disease, can’t refuse to make a cake for a gay wedding, etc.
Posted on 6/4/19 at 8:23 pm to theenemy
quote:
True....but is failure at your job against the law.
If failure at your job results in multiple deaths, of course it can be against the law.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News