- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Confirmation that Hillary approved the Russia Hoax from the outside
Posted on 7/31/25 at 2:51 pm to Mandtgr47
Posted on 7/31/25 at 2:51 pm to Mandtgr47
quote:Why are you so simple that 90% of your posts on this board have juvenile insults included? You are one angry little guy.
You are such a fig.
quote:Still wrong. Funny you never comment on my posts unless they are skeptical about something actually happening.
You used to pretend you were a conservative, but as the election came near, you couldn't help yourself in showing your true colors
Ignore my love for Trump's closing of the border, his deportations, his making permanent the tax cuts, the cuts to USAID, NPR, etc. Ignore that I think he's done an excellent job so far.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 6:18 am to Decatur
You mean the FBI that appears to have been complicit in helping Clinton with the false narrative? The FBI that was supposed to come along and "put more oil on the fire?"
Sure, they went and looked at what Crowdstrike had.
Not the way things are supposed to be done.
And, i'm sure that you have seen the Wasserman Schultz/Bernardo emails, right?
"In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike (created by former FBI) and Threatconnect will supply the media, and hopefully GRU will carry on to give more facts."
Sure, they went and looked at what Crowdstrike had.
Not the way things are supposed to be done.
And, i'm sure that you have seen the Wasserman Schultz/Bernardo emails, right?
"In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike (created by former FBI) and Threatconnect will supply the media, and hopefully GRU will carry on to give more facts."
Posted on 8/1/25 at 6:30 am to Jake88
quote:
Seems fake.
Many think the same thing about you so I guess it works itself out in the wash.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 6:36 am to Jake88
quote:
Seems fake. Why would anyone spell it out so clearly in the first lines of the email?

Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:08 am to AC1221
quote:
You mean the FBI that appears to have been complicit in helping Clinton with the false narrative? The FBI that was supposed to come along and "put more oil on the fire?"
you mean the FBI that Peter Strok said had a "backup plan for Trump"?
You mean the Intelligence community that Chuck Schumer bragged that they can come at you (paraphrasing) six ways from Sunday?
Yeah, those people. They don't even hide it.
Since sfp thinks this is all a legal opinion from black Jesus, and nothing more. I wonder if he thinks hillary, comey, brennan, clapper, and many more are any closer to legal troubles?
THe more that comes out, the more this looks like a RICO case.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:40 am to Screaming Viking
I'm there with you. I've moved past the potential conspiracy charges, and think RICO would be more apt.
Once you take all the threads we already knew, and tie them together with this new info, it all becomes obvious.
This makes Watergate look like a joke.
Once you take all the threads we already knew, and tie them together with this new info, it all becomes obvious.
This makes Watergate look like a joke.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:48 am to AC1221
quote:
I'm there with you. I've moved past the potential conspiracy charges, and think RICO would be more apt. Once you take all the threads we already knew, and tie them together with this new info, it all becomes obvious.
I regret to inform you that all of this has already been investigated. It was better known as the “Durham Investigation.”
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:29 am to Decatur
You mean the Durham Coverup.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:36 am to Stidham8
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:48 am to Stidham8
quote:
Later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire.
How does this correlate timewise with Peter Strozk’s text message to his girlfriend about the election of Trump: “We have an insurance policy”?
Popular
Back to top

0






