- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Comcast has updated their Net Neutrality Pledge
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:14 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:14 pm to Green Chili Tiger
They say they won't block, throttle or discriminate against any content and you're angry...
It's the height of stupidity
It's the height of stupidity
3
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:15 pm to CptBengal
quote:Nope. That's what they said in March.
They say they won't block, throttle or discriminate
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:16 pm to CptBengal
quote:
They say they won't block, throttle or discriminate against any content and you're angry...
And if your ISP decides that that only liberal sites get access to the fast lanes you'll be completely calm. I mean, they wouldn't be blocking, throttling, or discriminating would they?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:17 pm to AUsteriskPride
You already have to do that...
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:17 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
And if your ISP decides that that only liberal sites get access to the fast lanes you'll be completely calm.
As long as they keep to their second bullet point.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:19 pm to Green Chili Tiger
That wouldn't be very transparent.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:20 pm to Green Chili Tiger
He set a logical trap for you all and y’all fell into it...
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:20 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
They removed "Comcast doesn't prioritize Internet traffic or create paid fast lanes".
They also said that they will not block, slow down, or discriminate lawful content.
Why did you ignore that part? Why are you being blatantly dishonest?
I would think that "pledge" would make Comcast subscribers that like Net Neutrality happy.
If Comcast decides to sell a standard 50 MB package with an option for faster access (gigabit for example) to certain subscription sites, that would be a great thing for consumers.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:21 pm to Aristo
quote:
That wouldn't be very transparent.
Because ISPs never "update their service terms" right?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:21 pm to starsandstripes
quote:
I believe that within 6 months there will be a new ISP on the market.
Whose fiber will this new ISP be using?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:21 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:
They're priming to frick over the internet mass consumers! You might actually have to pay for your bandwidth consumption that goes above the average user. The horror.
These pathetic Sky Screamers are so damn transparent.
That's really all they are worried about.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:22 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Nope. That's what they said in March.
What am I missing? It says that clear as day, right now.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:24 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Because ISPs never "update their service terms" right?
And will their service term be, "we will no longer allow our users to visit conservative websites"?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:25 pm to moneyg
Will not vs. Currently do not
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:29 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Will not vs. Currently do not
Oh noooooo
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:29 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Will not vs. Currently do not
Would them changing it to "will not" make you happy? Because, you see, well, uh, it said "will not" before.
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:29 pm to CptBengal
Consumers regulate businesses FAR more effectively than the Feds ever could. I'm not sure why people are willing to have the Fed gov't regulate the Internet. A quick glance at Obamacare should be all you need to know about gov't regulation.....
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:30 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
They removed "Comcast doesn't prioritize Internet traffic or create paid fast lanes".
if they don't slow down regular content, who cares?
why do you care if people want to pay more for better access? how does it affect you if the other plans don't change?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:31 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
And if your ISP decides that that only liberal sites get access to the fast lanes you'll be completely calm. I mean, they wouldn't be blocking, throttling, or discriminating would they?
if they don't slow down non-liberal sites, it will affect him 0% so why would he care?
Posted on 12/15/17 at 4:32 pm to SLafourche07
quote:You mean back when NN was being enforced? That's the whole point.
Would them changing it to "will not" make you happy? Because, you see, well, uh, it said "will not" before.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News