- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clinton under oath says Trump wasn’t involved with Epstein
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:53 pm to PurpleCrush
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:53 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Trump lies, and is why we are at this stage of the ongoing "investigation"
Oh we’re at this point in the “investigation” because Trump lies? And not because innocent victims of sexual assault and abuse deserve justice, apparently. That’s what I figured.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 5:57 pm
2
Posted on 2/27/26 at 5:54 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Lol, Clinton's don't need any MAGA love, they are good. Trump lies, and is why we are at this stage of the ongoing "investigation"
It takes a village
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:04 pm to davyjones
Oh we’re at this point in the “investigation” because Trump lies? And not because innocent victims of sexual assault and abuse deserve justice, apparently. That’s what I figured
and when we speak about "on going investigation" are we speaking about the one started by Garland under the Biden administration?
at some point don't you think Clarky and Crushy could have a moment of clarity and realize this push for an on going investigation is doing nothing other than hitting themselves and their own cult over the head with a hammer and move on?
have they really used all the other bullets in their "get Trump" gun and their just going to stay on this losing issue so they can pitch their once a week grief session for the rest of his term?
and when we speak about "on going investigation" are we speaking about the one started by Garland under the Biden administration?
at some point don't you think Clarky and Crushy could have a moment of clarity and realize this push for an on going investigation is doing nothing other than hitting themselves and their own cult over the head with a hammer and move on?
have they really used all the other bullets in their "get Trump" gun and their just going to stay on this losing issue so they can pitch their once a week grief session for the rest of his term?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:07 pm to ReauxlTide222
Damn you are really upset about Orange being exhonerated 
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:08 pm to davyjones
When was the last time Trump or Bondi(investigating) mention, speak to, or defend the victims?
Do you care about the victims? Not if you have already "exonerated " him without question, ask any lawyer.
The only victims on TD, is him, Always.
Do you care about the victims? Not if you have already "exonerated " him without question, ask any lawyer.
The only victims on TD, is him, Always.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:13 pm to hawgfaninc
Your thread title is very much like a NY Times, or WaPo headline. It's not exactly true, BUT it's not exactly false!
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:18 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Do you care about the victims? Not if you have already "exonerated " him without question.
Well bro, why is it even necessary to “exonerate” him or not exonerate him at all? I mean, exactly what is he duly charged with (and rumors and innuendo don’t count)? Additionally, even when someone is charged with a crime in this country, it’s not on the accused to exonerate him or herself, it’s incumbent on the government to prove the person guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, yadda yadda. I know you’re familiar with all of that.
But in this instance, we’re supposed to expect a man to prove himself not guilty of a crime that he isn’t even charged with? That’s precisely what is going on here, and specifically in the scenario stated in your post. How does that not stick out glaringly as a very big problem in thinking on this?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:20 pm to SDVTiger
Damn you are really upset about Orange being exhonerated
It's a beautiful full exoneration too!!!! nobody's ever seen anything like the full and total exoneration Orange just received from Clinton.
Many people are calling it the Big Beautiful Full Clinton Exoneration of Trump!!!!
It's a beautiful full exoneration too!!!! nobody's ever seen anything like the full and total exoneration Orange just received from Clinton.
Many people are calling it the Big Beautiful Full Clinton Exoneration of Trump!!!!
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:40 pm to Penrod
quote:
a blowjob would forever be known as a “Lewinski”. But no, it didn’t materialize.
I wonder if anyone 35 and below even realized the reason Bill Clinton is wearing a blue dress in that portrait that hung in Epstein‘s mansion was because of the famous Lewinsky blue dress with the infamous splooge stain?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:42 pm to hawgfaninc
Well we know he has a problem with telling the truth under oath, so that’s not entirely encouraging..
Posted on 2/27/26 at 6:43 pm to davyjones
Again, you are making it about him.
You asked about the victims and their rights to the truth, whatever that entails. Victims, right?
Hillary, and not others clearly with much more exposure and you don't want to hear from them?
You asked about the victims and their rights to the truth, whatever that entails. Victims, right?
Hillary, and not others clearly with much more exposure and you don't want to hear from them?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:01 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
Again, you are making it about him.
Seriously? You’re going to play that card? You literally stated only a short while ago that, and I quote, “Trump lies, and is why we are at this stage of the ongoing ‘investigation’”. You said it’s all about him, and his “lies,” which btw you haven’t specifically identified in this case or context. Anyhow, that’s what you said. So, let’s put it another way: you posted in a thread about an investigation that’s about Trump, so yeah, considering your own thoughts on that, yeah, I’m making it about Trump in this instance.
**All due respect, btw. You’re being courteous enough, and I hope to respond in kind.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:01 pm to TBoy
quote:
To clear this up, Trump should testify under oath next.
Lmao. Cause the tds individuals who are screaming that trump was tight with Epstein will surely stop believing that lie....if trump gets under oath and says he wasn't.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:05 pm to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:15 pm to davyjones
Davey, Trump controls the narrative, with AG help.
Stop. Does he lie, as in often and proven? Yes
Now, what does he /you say about the victims?
Stop. Does he lie, as in often and proven? Yes
Now, what does he /you say about the victims?
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:20 pm to PurpleCrush
I think we’re just going to have to agree to disagree. On everything. Possibly everything in existence.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:21 pm to TBoy
quote:
TBoy
Don't worry, Tboy. You'll get him next time.
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:22 pm to hawgfaninc
“ but they’ve got videos of Trump raping children!!!! Reeeeeeee!!!”
Right there with the pee tapes
Right there with the pee tapes
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:24 pm to davyjones
Sounds like it, we both know what we see, I guess its feelings and interpretations of that.
Have a good weekend!
Have a good weekend!
Posted on 2/27/26 at 7:24 pm to PurpleCrush
Indeed. And same to you.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News