Started By
Message

re: Clinton appointed judge rules Trump cant require citizenship proof on federal voting forms

Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:05 pm to
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
24470 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:05 pm to
Ludicrous!
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 6:20 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
86066 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:07 pm to
Anyone still believe non citizens don’t vote?

Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125510 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

This little thing called the Constitution. The Elections Clause, which grants states and Congress—not the federal executive—the authority to regulate elections. She is right, it does.


This poster is what we colloquially refer to as a dumbfrick.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125510 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

This is the job of the States, not the executive branch.


Imma let you reread the title of the thread. You can the correct your inanity or not.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
37113 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

These activist judges have got to be strung up
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
11350 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:21 pm to


She has licked a toilet bowl.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44166 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

On what basis?

Her opinion?


The Election clause of the constitution says only state and Congress can make that determination. The action itself isn't illegal it just can't come from the Executive Branch.
Posted by Jasharts77
Knoxville
Member since Nov 2019
974 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:24 pm to
Kinda looks like the old lady from Throw mama from the train
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
23055 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

She was actually first appointed to the bench by Reagan and then appointed to the FDC and then FISA court by Chief Justice William Rehnquist......of course those two are now considered RINOs.



Plenty of Reagan appointees have become leftists
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125510 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:25 pm to
It gets better.
From the ruling:
quote:

First, many of the Democratic Party Plaintiffs have organizational standing to challenge this provision based on its effect on their ability to register new voters as members and supporters of the Democratic Party, which they do in service of their mission of electing Democratic candidates to office throughout the country,”


Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125510 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

The Election clause of the constitution says only state and Congress can make that determination.


Can the Federal government amend its own forms?
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44166 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:30 pm to
Congress can, and should.

I don't understand after the ruling, they just don't do what the judge said and have Congress pass it. Republicans control both houses, and it would put Democratic Senators on record for voting against it.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125510 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:31 pm to
Non-responsive.
Move to strike.
This post was edited on 10/31/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16469 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

it would put Democratic Senators on record for voting against it.
they've voted 14 straight times to keep the government shutdown so illegals get free healthcare that we pay for. You think they give a shite?
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
14039 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:35 pm to
Ok, and so lets assume this is the correct interpretation of laws on the books.






Fix it. We have the house and senate. Fix it.
Though im sure Massie has a “conservative” reason this would be bad. MTG probably has a reason to oppose if Massie cant think of one.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8774 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Constitution clearly says voting is for citizens


Of course, but that's not the issue. It's the mechanism used to implement that. An Executive Order is not the means.
Posted by Bama Mountain
Member since Oct 2025
961 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8774 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:46 pm to
Thanks for posting. That should be a rule on X: must link actual decision.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46411 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:50 pm to
Another one-week wonder
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8774 posts
Posted on 10/31/25 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Plenty of Reagan appointees have become leftists


I haven't read the reasons for her decision, but it's not a leftist position to say that an Executive Order is not the means to regulate elections.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram