- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: climate czar, regular people who heat their homes We have to break your will
Posted on 2/8/21 at 8:44 am to TheHarahanian
Posted on 2/8/21 at 8:44 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
-However- when I need heat, I’ll make sure I have it, even if that means re-installing a wood burning oven like this house originally had. If you think gas burners are bad, wait till I’m throwing smoke out of a chimney.
Actually the EPA considers burning wood to be sustainable (there are a lot of questions regarding it, they just ignore them like they do all other questions regarding AGW doctrine). Trees will grow back in less time then it will take for new coal or oil or natural gas to form. In the process the will take enough CO2 out of the environment to compensate for the burning of other trees. Therefore wood is technically carbon neutral.
4
Posted on 2/8/21 at 12:29 pm to WeeWee
Didn't canada regulate wood burning because of "acid rain"? Will that become a problem again for their agenda?
Posted on 2/8/21 at 12:34 pm to Ailsa
Three pages and still no resident leftist to show and defend this shite.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 12:56 pm to Revelator
The solution to these sort of people is obvious. The question is how bad does it have to get before we get there.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 1:05 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Actually the EPA considers burning wood to be sustainable (there are a lot of questions regarding it, they just ignore them like they do all other questions regarding AGW doctrine). Trees will grow back in less time then it will take for new coal or oil or natural gas to form. In the process the will take enough CO2 out of the environment to compensate for the burning of other trees. Therefore wood is technically carbon neutral.
Go find some photos of some city in the Eastern US about 1890 and compare it with a photo of the same place today. You’ll notice that it looks like it was taken on some prairie in Western Oklahoma instead of anything we would recognize today. The reason of course, is that every damned tree within easy hauling distance of a stove got cut down in a hurry.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 1:49 pm to Crimson Wraith
quote:
Looks like Ebb from Green Acres.
don't insult Eb like this. 
this article is proof positive they think they are gods and we are deplorable. and how we should gift them with thanks for getting rid of OMB.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 2:06 pm to TS1926
quote:
Three pages and still no resident leftist to show and defend this shite.
They'll show up after something like that passes and then make excuses about how it was lesser of 2 evils.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 2:37 pm to WeeWee
quote:
In the process the will take enough CO2 out of the environment to compensate for the burning of other trees. Therefore wood is technically carbon neutral.
No. Any idea how little CO2 a mature tree actually processes per year? It's not even enough to offset the CO2 exhausted during the effort of the human that planted it. Deforestation was an issue during the Bronze Age.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 2:41 pm to Revelator
Someone go to his house in the middle of the night next Nor'easter and kill the power and drain his heating oil tank.
Let his stupid jackass self sit in 5 degree temps and then beg for heat.
Let his stupid jackass self sit in 5 degree temps and then beg for heat.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 2:46 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Actually the EPA considers burning wood to be sustainable (there are a lot of questions regarding it, they just ignore them like they do all other questions regarding AGW doctrine). Trees will grow back in less time
Yeah, until 330 million Americans and 7 billion people are meeting their heating needs with burning wood. How long do you think those forests will last?
Posted on 2/8/21 at 2:49 pm to PEEPO
quote:
And much like with added fuel costs, it won't effect the rich, only the poor and middle class.
That's a big negative ghost rider. When have the poor in this country been denied ANYTHING?
The middle class is who is fricked.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 3:08 pm to omegaman66
quote:
You better find a way to hide the firewood and the smoke.
I live in the woods with 2 fireplaces. I don't have a no trespassing sign up, I have a Good Luck sign up
Posted on 2/8/21 at 4:07 pm to Revelator
quote:2, 2
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News