- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: City of Glendale, CA releases statement that they’re no longer cooperating with ICE
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:09 pm to KiwiHead
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:09 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Either you allow for States Rights and Home Rule or you don't.
Is the state paying for it in full? No?
Tell me about the Eisenhower Interstate System.
Can California tell the Feds that they aren’t allowed to use the Interstate highways in their state anymore?
3
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:10 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Can California tell the Feds that they aren’t allowed to use the Interstate highways in their state anymore?
In what way is this comparable to a literal contract they have with fedgov?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:11 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Can California tell the Feds that they aren’t allowed to use the Interstate highways in their state anymore?
they can threaten to stop funding them, like the Feds did with the drinking age.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
I mean:
quote:
When the program took shape in the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, it differed in some ways from the President's proposal, particularly with regard to the source of funding for the program, but Congress retained the Federal-State matching share of 90-10 as a reflection of the Interstate Construction Program's importance to national goals. (In the western States with large amounts of untaxed public land, the Federal share could be increased to 95 percent.)
someone is agreeing to pay the other 5-10%…no?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:15 pm to jimmy the leg
That's not a contract. That's a perpetual federal program.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Can California tell the Feds that they aren’t allowed to use the Interstate highways in their state anymore?
quote:
they can threaten to stop funding them, like the Feds did with the drinking age.
True.
The Feds pay 90-95% of the cost, which does give them quite a bit of leverage.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's not a contract. That's a perpetual federal program.
So who is paying that 5-10%?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:18 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
So who is paying that 5-10%?
The answer has no relevance to a discussion of what OP is about.
It's a bad example/comparison. That's the point.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The answer has no relevance to a discussion of what OP is about.
In your opinion (which is shite).
quote:
It's a bad example/comparison.
In your opinion (which is shite).
quote:
That's the point.
Wait, you think that you have a point?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's a bad example/comparison.
So this is your go to answer when you can't answer the question truthfully. Got it.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
So not having punctuation at the end of a sentence is grammatically correct in your mind?
ETA - the above Charlie Murphy gif is most appropriate for your clown takes.
ETA - the above Charlie Murphy gif is most appropriate for your clown takes.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:24 pm to Wellborn
Just prosecute anyone who commits this crime.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:25 pm to jimmy the leg
when arguments devolve into grammar gotchas, you know you've made your point.
Do people ever agree to disagree around here?
Do people ever agree to disagree around here?
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:34 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
when arguments devolve into grammar gotchas, you know you've made your point.
I mean, SFP attempted to do that, but incorrectly applied it.
quote:
Do people ever agree to disagree around here?
It’s SFP, so no.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:40 pm to Wellborn
Oh! Well let's just call off the deportations then folks.
We can't go on without the Glendale pussies that can't accept that 80% of Americans WANT this.
We can't go on without the Glendale pussies that can't accept that 80% of Americans WANT this.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 3:13 pm to jimmy the leg
So you are saying that this is a one way contract that you will agree to and thus sign.
The idea of a contract is that you are free to reject it or accept it. Hell, you can even break it.....with penalty.
The idea of a contract is that you are free to reject it or accept it. Hell, you can even break it.....with penalty.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 3:13 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
In your opinion (which is shite).
quote:
In your opinion (which is shite).
Posted on 6/9/25 at 3:14 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
I mean, SFP attempted to do that, but incorrectly applied it.
Wrong. You started it and embarrassed yourself.
Now you're projecting, as usual.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 3:14 pm to Lg
quote:
So this is your go to answer when you can't answer the question truthfully. Got it.
I can, but I want the discussion to stay focused.
Posted on 6/9/25 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
Chubbs simpin for SFP... who'd a thunk it.
Page 17 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News