Started By
Message

re: City of Glendale, CA releases statement that they’re no longer cooperating with ICE

Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:17 pm to
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34265 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Start Dumping illegals in Glendale.

Along with homeless and petty criminals.


This will happen naturally...they will go there themselves to avoid deportation. Hopefully the progressives there love having the culture land on their doorstep.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34265 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

If Trump really was into 4-D chess, he should release a statement and then follow it up with directives, that illegals residing in California, Minnesota and New York will be lower priority for deportation than those in the other 47 states.

It would be good fun watching ten million more illegals in those states and out of ours.


Bingo. But we also need to stop counting illegals in the census for the purposes of congressional representation and budget allocation.

ETA: Include Illinois in that list.
This post was edited on 6/9/25 at 12:22 pm
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
30817 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:29 pm to
public safety being a core value is hilarious
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
3712 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:32 pm to
Are suggesting the federal government couldn’t compel the port to open to federal access? Of course military bases operate on federal land that came from the states, who do you think took it from there? You are almost there, keep going
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
33312 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 12:44 pm to
ICE could still conduct raids in Glendale, but Glendale is saying that we won't house them in our detention facility for your convenience.

Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
38728 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Glendale is saying that we won't house them in our detention facility for your convenience.



And the federal government can refuse aid to Glendale after they riot and burn their city.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
40026 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

But, in this instance, the Federal government is asking the City of Glendale to provide a service. A service that the city says it no longer wants to provide namely, the housing of federal immigration detainees in an otherwise municipal facility.


Is that facility funded at any level by the Federal government?

If yes, then it’s apples to apples.

Glendale should have read the fine print.

quote:

Caveat Emptor
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
40026 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

ICE could still conduct raids in Glendale, but Glendale is saying that we won't house them in our detention facility for your convenience.


We?
Our?
Your?

You seemed biased.

Did you let your Visa expire or something?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452768 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

We?
Our?
Your?

You seemed biased.


How is speaking in the person of Glendale showing a bias? He even put "Glendale is saying" prior to that. Should have been a context clue

You're trying WAY too hard, ITT

Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
78583 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

ICE could still conduct raids in Glendale, but Glendale is saying that we won't house them in our detention facility for your convenience.

So they don't want to bloated funds that flow into the city budget for hold for the Feds. Brilliant!
Posted by Dissident Aggressor
Member since Aug 2011
4810 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Why would they not want to help?!

how can democrat politicians possibly think that supporting anarchy is a winning hand…
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
40026 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:38 pm to
Slowhomo inc. is saying that we are disingenuous.

We?

I’m not a member of your organization.

It should read:

Slowhomo Inc. is saying that THEY are disingenuous.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452768 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

We?


Is English your 2nd language?

He clearly wrote "Glendale is saying"

Why would that not follow with the first person?

quote:

Slowhomo Inc. is saying that THEY are disingenuous.


Yes, because then that would be the third person, as I would be describing what a third party is saying.

The problem is that isn't what he did, as he clearly wrote

"Glendale is saying"

Did you pass elementary school?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
63139 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:44 pm to
If California was its own country it would be poor because it would have to pay for its own defense. And with its retarded population it would tax out any business within a year.

Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
40026 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

Is English your 2nd language? He clearly wrote "Glendale is saying"

This is what he wrote:

quote:

ICE could still conduct raids in Glendale, but Glendale is saying that we won't house them in our detention facility for your convenience.


quote:

Why would that not follow with the first person?


Because he wasn’t quoting them.

Which begs the question:

quote:

Is English your 2nd language?


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452768 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Because he wasn’t quoting them.


He was clearly speaking in their voice, which requires the first person.

In a fit of irony, you trying to be edgy and call him out for being bias but only show your own (and your need for remedial grammar education)
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283721 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:03 pm to
quote:


If California was its own country it would be poor


California is already doomed by demographics.

The poverty and low educational ranking is proceeding at mach speed, there is no stopping whats coming.

California was probably heaven through the early 80s, and now its a dystopian dump.

The middle class exodus just speeds up the timeline.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
33312 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:05 pm to
Stay away from sharp objects. Either you allow for States Rights and Home Rule or you don't. If I don't want to put my services to work on behalf of the federal government, I don't have to. Neither does the City of Glendale. If the Federal Government wants to house the people, the City of Glendale says fine, but use your own facilities that YOU operate.....don't stuff it off on us, we don't want the headache.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
40026 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

In a fit of irony, you trying to be edgy and call him out for being bias but only show your own (and your need for remedial grammar education)


Is the following
quote:

being bias

grammatically correct?

How about not having a period at the end of a sentence?

Speaking of irony…
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452768 posts
Posted on 6/9/25 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

grammatically correct?

No I made a typo. See I can admit it. Contrary to public opinion, I admit when I'm wrong.

quote:

How about not having a period at the end of a sentence?

first pageprev pagePage 16 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram