- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA Kept Soviet Cancer Research Classified for 64 Years
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:10 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:10 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I have administered the frickin drug for cancer myself.
What you administered did nothing, as the current class of drug is not capable of doing what you claim it did.
0
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Although fenbendazole exhibits promising anti-cancer effects, experimental studies indicated its poor water solubility has hindered its therapeutic performance. When administered orally, fenbendazole struggles to reach systemic circulation and, subsequently, the therapeutic levels necessary to impact tumors
What we found is that it's most effective when taken as a powder instead of a tablet with DMSO Oil as a carrier oil.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:11 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
The archives everywhere are full of compounds that kill cancer cells in vitro, but the trick is doing it without doing excessive damage to you.
Like...radiation and chemo
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
yes, drug deliverability is absolutely another issue. It doesn't take a conspiracy to fail to bring cancer cures to market. 
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:12 pm to AlterEd
So yet another conspiracy theory turns out to be true.
Lizard people and aliens are about the only two pre-2025 that I can think of that haven't been confirmed. Oh and maybe the stolen gold in fort knox but that isn't debunked either.
Lizard people and aliens are about the only two pre-2025 that I can think of that haven't been confirmed. Oh and maybe the stolen gold in fort knox but that isn't debunked either.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:12 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
The archives everywhere are full of compounds that kill cancer cells in vitro, but the trick is doing it without doing excessive damage to you.
The danger with fenbendazole seems to be the liver. It can harm the liver. It should be taken with Tudca.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:12 pm to omegaman66
quote:
So yet another conspiracy theory turns out to be true.
Holy shite
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
from Grok:
The headline—"CIA faces furious backlash after hidden document with potential cure for cancer is declassified"—is misleading and not entirely true. While a real 1951 CIA document summarizing Soviet research on biochemical similarities between parasitic worms and cancer tumors does exist and was declassified in 2014
, it resurfaced recently on social media, sparking public outrage and conspiracy claims about suppressed cures
. However, the document does not claim cancer is caused by parasites, nor does it present a "cure"—it only notes metabolic parallels (like anaerobic processes and glycogen storage) and early experiments where antiparasitic compounds (e.g., Myracyl D) showed effects on tumors in lab settings
. Modern science views these as outdated insights into cancer metabolism, not evidence of parasitism or hidden treatments
. The "hidden" aspect is exaggerated, as the declassification happened over a decade ago, and the backlash stems more from viral misinterpretations than new revelations.
The headline—"CIA faces furious backlash after hidden document with potential cure for cancer is declassified"—is misleading and not entirely true. While a real 1951 CIA document summarizing Soviet research on biochemical similarities between parasitic worms and cancer tumors does exist and was declassified in 2014
, it resurfaced recently on social media, sparking public outrage and conspiracy claims about suppressed cures
. However, the document does not claim cancer is caused by parasites, nor does it present a "cure"—it only notes metabolic parallels (like anaerobic processes and glycogen storage) and early experiments where antiparasitic compounds (e.g., Myracyl D) showed effects on tumors in lab settings
. Modern science views these as outdated insights into cancer metabolism, not evidence of parasitism or hidden treatments
. The "hidden" aspect is exaggerated, as the declassification happened over a decade ago, and the backlash stems more from viral misinterpretations than new revelations.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:14 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Wrong. Sorry it hurts your fee fees and Fauci and the nightly news sponsored by Pfizer on the TV box told you different.
LINK
quote:
(1) Although a large number of research results indicate that IVM affects multiple signaling pathways in tumor cells and inhibits proliferation, IVM may cause antitumor activity in tumor cells through specific targets. However, to date, no exact target for IVM action has been found. (2) IVM regulates the tumor microenvironment, inhibits the activity of tumor stem cells and reduces tumor angiogenesis and tumor metastasis. However, there is no systematic and clear conclusion regarding the related molecular mechanism.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:14 pm to Cosmo
quote:
quote:
This is a lie.
No it isnt
You think oncologists are letting friends and family members die when there is a cheap cure?
This board has completely lost its mind.
Did COVID not teach you that doctor's are not infallible? Did it not teach you that most doctor's only know what they are taught?
Did COVID not teach you that the medical and pharmaceutical industries are extremely corrupt and profit driven?
If not, you're the one that has lost your mind.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:14 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
The headline—"CIA faces furious backlash after hidden document with potential cure for cancer is declassified"—is misleading and not entirely true. While a real 1951 CIA document summarizing Soviet research on biochemical similarities between parasitic worms and cancer tumors does exist and was declassified in 2014
, it resurfaced recently on social media, sparking public outrage and conspiracy claims about suppressed cures
. However, the document does not claim cancer is caused by parasites, nor does it present a "cure"—it only notes metabolic parallels (like anaerobic processes and glycogen storage) and early experiments where antiparasitic compounds (e.g., Myracyl D) showed effects on tumors in lab settings
. Modern science views these as outdated insights into cancer metabolism, not evidence of parasitism or hidden treatments
. The "hidden" aspect is exaggerated, as the declassification happened over a decade ago, and the backlash stems more from viral misinterpretations than new revelations.
Did the conspiracy theory over the conspiracy theory just get proven?
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:15 pm to NashvilleTider
My second reply to the OP was a summary of the paper. Yeah, the X post is inaccurate. It doesn't claim this is a cure. But instead it is research suggesting anti-parasitics may be useful in treating cancer because malignant tumors show parallels to parasites. And it's true. Go figure.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:15 pm to NashvilleTider
Yes, it's engagement bait and it's working.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:16 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Yeah, the X post is inaccurate.
quote:
Step 1: It's not really happening
Step 2: Yeah, it's happening, but it's not a big deal
Step 3: It's a good thing, actually
Step 4: People freaking out about it are the real problem
You just hit step 3
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:16 pm to AlterEd
Not onlu Fenbendazole but Ivermectin. There is a ton of cases and research that shows parasites either cause some cancers or themselves comprise most of the tumors, especially in breast cancer.
Before you jump up and down about Ivermectin the researchers received a Nobel Prize in Medicine for using ivermectin to River Blindness in humans. Several billion doses over the years in developing countries.
But Big Pharma and Big Cancer knew this already.
Before you jump up and down about Ivermectin the researchers received a Nobel Prize in Medicine for using ivermectin to River Blindness in humans. Several billion doses over the years in developing countries.
But Big Pharma and Big Cancer knew this already.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:17 pm to AlterEd
quote:
My second reply to the OP was a summary of the paper. Yeah, the X post is inaccurate. It doesn't claim this is a cure. But instead it is research suggesting anti-parasitics may be useful in treating cancer because malignant tumors show parallels to parasites. And it's true. Go figure.
Yeah, that’s a much more accurate way to frame it.
Biology does have some weird overlaps like that. Tumors and parasites both basically behave like systems trying to hijack resources inside a host, so researchers sometimes look for parallels in metabolism and growth patterns.
That doesn’t mean cancer is a parasite, but it can sometimes lead to ideas for treatments. A lot of cancer drugs actually came out of weird places like antibiotics, fungi, or plant toxins.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:19 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Yup. HIV is essentially cured as well and those meds are about to be cheap and generic.
HIV is not "cured." It's treated. You have to take the meds for the rest of your life to remain AIDS free.
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:20 pm to Penrod
quote:
Because they wanted their relatives and friends, who would inevitably get cancer, to die rather than be cured?
Dude. People kill relatives and friends for money and power frequently. Like all of the time.
We kill babies for convenience. And now your talking about someone with the personality that's attracted to working in secrets and shadows.
Yeah that person is trustworthy.
This post was edited on 3/9/26 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 3/9/26 at 3:20 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
In addition to being antiparasitic agents, benzimidazole anthelmintics are known to exert anticancer activities, such as the disruption of microtubule polymerization, the induction of apoptosis, cell cycle (G2/M) arrest, anti-angiogenesis, and blockage of glucose transport
NIH on Fenbendazole Having Anti-Cancer Properties
And we can keep going if we must. There are lots of them out there at this point.
Page 3 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News