- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CIA Kept Soviet Cancer Research Classified for 64 Years
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:56 pm to KingOfTheWorld
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:56 pm to KingOfTheWorld
quote:
I’m probably in the minority on this board who actually has had cancer . Pancreatic cancer diagnosed May 29, 2025. I was treated at UAB O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center in Birmingham. Six rounds of folfirinox chemo, then Whipple surgery. The last six rounds of chemo were canceled because they weren’t necessary.
I can honestly say the physicians, nurses and all support staff believe 100% in what they are doing. Is there a better protocol, a better “cure”? Are they doing it “for the money?” I don’t know. I only know that I was diagnosed with one of the Top 3 lethal cancers known to mankind and after all that, I was declared cancer-free on January 26, 2026.
I had friends, acquaintances and strangers messaging me to never do chemo, only fenbendazole and ivermectin, along with various other “holistic” remedies such as eating crushed apricot seeds, dandelion root and 5-day fasts. Not against any of those things. But I went with established medical protocols
God Bless you Brother. That's a tough one to beat. It took my Grandfather and a couple of close friends.
It's the one that scares me.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:00 pm to bamadontcare
It's a good thread to read.
John's Hopkins is behind a lot of sketchy stuff .... including the Covid narrative that ended up being bullshite.
Ref: Page 15 lower part of the thread.
John's Hopkins is behind a lot of sketchy stuff .... including the Covid narrative that ended up being bullshite.
Ref: Page 15 lower part of the thread.
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:10 pm to scrooster
quote:
God Bless you Brother. That's a tough one to beat. It took my Grandfather and a couple of close friends.
It's the one that scares me.
I didn’t mention that my dad died from pancreatic cancer in 2017. He lived seven months. Eight years later I had it. I thought I was a goner. Got all my affairs in order. Mine was found much earlier, which is unusual with this beast. Very thankful.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:35 pm to Cosmo
quote:
oncologists
My friend is one and he tells most patients to take it. There is ZERO downside
Posted on 3/10/26 at 10:41 pm to scrooster
quote:
It's a good thread to read. John's Hopkins is behind a lot of sketchy stuff .... including the Covid narrative that ended up being bullshite. Ref: Page 15 lower part of the thread.
You already got a downvote. See what I mean?
It’s just politics at this point.
These people have no intention to heal you
They worship the medical cooperate complex with a strong dose
of politics sprinkled in.
It’s a lost cause
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:07 pm to AlterEd
What about the thought of healthy, non cancerous people taking ivermectin, etc regularly as a preventative for cancer?
Mostly I read about taking these holistic alternatives after one gets cancer, not before.
Mostly I read about taking these holistic alternatives after one gets cancer, not before.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:16 pm to Archives
I mean, I don't think it could hurt. I think everyone should take anti-parasitics occasionally for overall health.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 11:51 pm to AlterEd
quote:
On the other hand, anti-parasitics cost pennies. People can try to shite on this line of thinking all they want, but I'm just saying that if cancer could be cured with anti-parasitics, the net loss to pharmaceutical companies would be immense. And that's just a frickin fact.
I said it earlier but you never addressed it - ivermectin was under patent for Merck until 1996. They had every chance in the world to profit immensely on it IF it was helpful in treating cancer. Why didn’t they?
Posted on 3/11/26 at 1:04 am to slackster
quote:
said it earlier but you never addressed it -
Does it upset you that I didn't address something you said? Maybe it's because your first post in the thread was a straight up lie. You said I had been misrepresenting TigerDoc throughout the thread and it wasn't frickin true. You jumped in to shite on the thread with blatant bullshite and for no damn reason. I'm not obligated to address shite you say and especially when you aren't posting in good faith.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 6:10 am to AlterEd
The research costs are crazy expensive as well. My guess is that if Ivermectin was solidified as a true anti-neoplastic drug, the costs for it would skyrocket, simply based on the money they would funnel to research and sequester in the coffers to fight and pay out claims. All it takes is for one bad outcome to cost millions of dollars in a liability case, and most of time there is no insurance to cover that type of litigation. Lawyers that work for drug companies are not paid in chicken feed, that's for sure.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 6:31 am to AlterEd
Ed, I am sorry for our loss and for that horrendous experience. No one should have to go thru that, unfortunately I hear a story like that far too frequently. Cancer is a thief that steals our livelihood and our loved ones. Your wife was lucky that she had someone to help care for her in those final days. God bless you and I hope He can give you some peace after suffering thru that horrible event. As someone who works in the medical field, I do not believe that any physician would withhold a cure from a patient based entirely upon the ability to make money. If they do, then they are seriously scum of the Earth. Most oncologists follow treatment plans set up to investigate drugs and drug combination, sometimes with other combined therapies to help create a database that can be used to investigate effective treatment modalities. Some are more successful than others, but when they find something that works, they tend to use it.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 7:28 am to AlterEd
quote:
This isn't quite "newly" declassified, but I guess it's just now making it to public light. Isn't it strange that people are just now discovering that anti-parasitics are effective at fighting cancer and the Soviets and CIA knew about it all the way back in 1950? Now why would they keep this research hidden for so long?
Odds are the research wasn’t knowledge solely held by intelligence agencies.
How many times have we seen promising research never amount to anything? The article is likely yet another example.
It’s not like the Soviets cured cancer. Have the Soviets ever led any major medical breakthrough? Who among us thinks that nation could cure cancer at any time in its history?
Posted on 3/11/26 at 8:30 am to AlterEd
quote:
Does it upset you that I didn't address something you said? Maybe it's because your first post in the thread was a straight up lie. You said I had been misrepresenting TigerDoc throughout the thread and it wasn't frickin true. You jumped in to shite on the thread with blatant bullshite and for no damn reason. I'm not obligated to address shite you say and especially when you aren't posting in good faith.
This is about what I expected. Thank you.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 8:48 am to DocYatesVA
Thank you for the kind words, doc.
I just hope they get it figured out sooner than later. As you said, people shouldn't have to go through shite like that. Even if you think you're prepared for it, you aren't. It's terrible.
I just hope they get it figured out sooner than later. As you said, people shouldn't have to go through shite like that. Even if you think you're prepared for it, you aren't. It's terrible.
Posted on 3/12/26 at 2:02 pm to BTROleMisser
Popular
Back to top


1





