- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charges against LA AG Murrill Officially Dismissed
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:19 pm to BTROleMisser
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:19 pm to BTROleMisser
You think there is decades-old evidence that would incriminate someone in New Orleans for doing something that shouldn't have been done that led to the indictment of Liz Murrill?
Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks for the clarification.
1
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:23 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You think there is decades-old evidence that would incriminate someone in New Orleans for doing something that shouldn't have been done that led to the indictment of Liz Murrill?
Thanks for the clarification
Mmmm... delicious melt.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:26 pm to TD422
quote:Is there a concrete standard for determining what is appropriate?
You do understand that the DA and Judge are required to possess some understanding of when it's appropriate versus when it's not appropriate to call for a GJ, correct?
quote:Since you are familiar, what procedure was likely violated or breached that resulted in Liz Murrill's civil rights being violated? Which of her civil rights was violated?
You do understand that there is at the very least some question that procedures may have been violated in the convention of the GJ, correct?
You do understand that once they opened that door, they are potentially liable for any missteps, civil rights violations, and breaches of misconduct, correct?
quote:i said explicitly that I didn't know procedures around convening a Grand Jury and that I was sincerely asking for clarity. No one will provide any clarity just hopes that a vague civil rights violation comes to light.
What aggravates the hell out of most of us about your schtick is that when you want to be taken seriously, you actually do possess some critical thinking skills and command of the english language
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Is there a concrete standard for determining what is appropriate?
Your already admitted "frivolity" of the prosecution would probably be a good starting point.
Seems like you, as much as anyone, would be up in arms about actors of the state trying to use the criminal/judicial process in a frivolous manner.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:34 pm to 4cubbies
quote:How's that?
The situation exposes more blatant hypocrisy from the poli board at large
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:45 pm to AlxTgr
When the State exercised its legal authority to nullify the practical effect of a local election, the answer was simply, “The State had the legal authority.” But when Orleans officials exercised legal authority to pursue an indictment, the discussion suddenly shifted from legality to whether they should have exercised that authority.
Posters are now outraged about a potential vague and unnamed civil rights violation of a Republican politician while scoffing at actual demonstrated State interference to local democratic governance.
The poliboard is only concerned with the feelings of Republicans. That's it. If a Republican has hurt feelings, the poliboard will run to that Republican's internet defense regardless of professed principles or values.
Posters are now outraged about a potential vague and unnamed civil rights violation of a Republican politician while scoffing at actual demonstrated State interference to local democratic governance.
The poliboard is only concerned with the feelings of Republicans. That's it. If a Republican has hurt feelings, the poliboard will run to that Republican's internet defense regardless of professed principles or values.
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:48 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Seems like you, as much as anyone, would be up in arms about actors of the state trying to use the criminal/judicial process in a frivolous manner.
Can I presume you feel similarly about the frivolous charges pressed by Liz Murrill against Susan Hutson and her CFO?
I called the indictment frivolous. What other action do you expect me to take? What action did you take?
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:04 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Can I presume you feel similarly about the frivolous charges pressed by Liz Murrill against Susan Hutson and her CFO?
If I had admitted to the frivolity of such, sure.
You're assuming facts not in evidence.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:10 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Seems like you, as much as anyone, would be up in arms about actors of the state trying to use the criminal/judicial process in a frivolous manner.
She’s a political species, not a principled individual. She’s only against government prosecutorial overreach when she can play the white leftist savior. One of the many reasons why posters don’t take her or her opinions seriously
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:21 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
If I had admitted to the frivolity of such, sure.
You did not decry the indictment against Murrill? Mea culpa.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:25 pm to 4cubbies
Murrill just said DA Williams is the culprit
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:29 pm to 4cubbies
quote:You mean when there was no position for the election?
When the State exercised its legal authority to nullify the practical effect of a local election
quote:Yeah, these aren't comparable in the slightest.
But when Orleans officials exercised legal authority to pursue an indictment, the discussion suddenly shifted from legality to whether they should have exercised that authority.
quote:This did not happen.
Posters are now outraged about a potential vague and unnamed civil rights violation of a Republican politician while scoffing at actual demonstrated State interference to local democratic governance.
quote:This statemnt could and may be correct, but it has nothing to do with any issue discussed in this thread. I think you probably need to research more before posting, or simply read without posting until you can understand basic civics.
The poliboard is only concerned with the feelings of Republicans. That's it. If a Republican has hurt feelings, the poliboard will run to that Republican's internet defense regardless of professed principles or values.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:31 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Is there a concrete standard for determining what is appropriate?
No, dingleberry, Judges and DA's just do what they want to do. There are NO RULES governing ethics or procedure. It's a virtual legal orgy, apparently, in Orleans Parish.
quote:
Since you are familiar, what procedure was likely violated or breached that resulted in Liz Murrill's civil rights being violated? Which of her civil rights was violated?
I don't know...you don't know...so while I can't say any investigation will go beyond just investigation, you cannot say the investigation shouldn't take place. What scares you about this?
quote:
i said explicitly that I didn't know procedures around convening a Grand Jury
See my reply above, let the process play out. But this scares you, so you're willing to question it at every turn.
I have stated on more than one occasion that I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but I'm done with that. You have been screaming for justice and fairness for the poor disenfranchised voters that elected the CofC, and anyone who doesn't align with your viewpoint doesn't get the same. You're a hypocrite of the highest order. But the difference between you and me is that you're willing to look away when your side violates the law. I can't say the same for me.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:42 pm to 4cubbies
quote:I know what you look like. Or, at least what you looked like about 10 years ago.
I think the most pathetic part of this whole thing is that you spend your time imagining and posting about what I look like
You posted a photo of yourself, remember?
I'd say you were about 3 tequila shots at 2:00 AM away from being nice looking in spite of the huge, oversized sunglasses you were wearing.
I was shocked you'd post a photo on the internet of your young child with you.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:44 pm to TD422
quote:You've repeatedly referred to possible procedural violations. Why are you refusing to actually name a violation?
No, dingleberry, Judges and DA's just do what they want to do. There are NO RULES governing ethics or procedure. It's a virtual legal orgy, apparently, in Orleans Parish.
quote:Huh? You referenced a violation so I asked you what it was. I didn't say anything about suspending an investigation that hasn't started yet. Why would I be scared? I wasn't involved with any of this stuff.
I don't know...you don't know...so while I can't say any investigation will go beyond just investigation, you cannot say the investigation shouldn't take place. What scares you about this?
quote:This is what you posted. Were you just trying to manifest a violation?
You do understand that there is at the very least some question that procedures may have been violated in the convention of the GJ, correct?
quote:You're using some emotional language - why? You think my asking you to clarify what procedures you claim were violated is an admission of fear? Or is this an admission that you don't know what your own accusations are?
See my reply above, let the process play out. But this scares you, so you're willing to question it at every turn.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:50 pm to LSURussian
I didn't have any kids 10 years ago, but noted. I wasn't even posting here 10 years ago. I think I stopped posting in 2012? I took a long break. I didn't start posting again until 2023 or 2024.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:57 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You've repeatedly referred to possible procedural violations. Why are you refusing to actually name a violation?
I USED THE WORD POSSIBLE DUMBASS.
quote:
This is what you posted. Were you just trying to manifest a violation?
I DIDN'T MAKE UP ANYTHING DUMBASS. IT'S BEEN REPORTED BY MULTIPLE NEWS OUTLETS THAT THERE WAS SOME QUESTION AS TO SOME IMPROPRIETY OF PROCEDURE IN CONVENING THE GJ, DUMBASS.
quote:
an admission that you don't know what your own accusations are
THEY'RE NOT MY ACCUSATIONS, DUMBASS.
MY GOD, YOU'RE A DUMBASS., AND A FEMALE SFP TO BOOT. YOU JUST OBFUSCATING TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE YOU CANNOT BE REASONED WITH, YOU DUMBASS.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:01 pm to TD422
quote:
I USED THE WORD POSSIBLE DUMBASS.
If an indictment is an accusation of a possible crime and you're claiming that suggesting Murrill possibly committed crimes was egregious, so you're using the same framing of "possibility of a violation" to figuratively indict officials in New Orleans?
Fighting fire with fire. Nice.
quote:
MY GOD, YOU'RE A DUMBASS., AND A FEMALE SFP TO BOOT. YOU JUST OBFUSCATING TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S REASONABLE TO CONCLUDE YOU CANNOT BE REASONED WITH, YOU DUMBASS.
All caps and everything! Waiting with bated breath for you to call me emotional now. This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:14 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
If an indictment is an accusation of a possible crime and you're claiming that suggesting Murrill possibly committed crimes was egregious, so you're using the same framing of "possibility of a violation" to figuratively indict officials in New Orleans?
Fighting fire with fire. Nice.
AND YET YOU FAIL TO SEE HOW THAT NEGATES YOUR ARGUMENT THAT MURRILL SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
AGAIN, YOU'RE ONLY INTERESTED IN THE LAW AS A NIGHT STICK WHEN YOU WANT TO APPLY IT. SCREW EVERYONE ELSE, RIGHT?
DUMBASS.
AND DON'T BOTHER REPLYING, I'M DONE WITH YOU. YOU'RE SO BLINDED BY YOUR IDEOLOGY THAT YOU CAN'T SEE PAST YOUR OWN FACE.
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:16 pm to TD422
quote:
THAT NEGATES YOUR ARGUMENT THAT MURRILL SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
I NEVER MADE THE ARGUMENT THAT SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
AND DON'T BOTHER REPLYING!
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 4:17 pm
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News