- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CDC covered up study showing 1135% increase in autism with Hep B vaccine…
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:06 am to trinidadtiger
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:06 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
If schools deem a person is "in the spectrum" do they get extra funding? Does the parent? do they get meds to zombie a normal hyperactive kid who has been fed sugar and chips galore?
The short answer is no. Depends on the needs of the individual student. Many autistic kids need minimal to no additional assistance.
0
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:06 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
If schools deem a person is "in the spectrum"
A school can't gove a diagnosis
If you have met kods with autism they struggle (especially at an early age) in school. I agree there are way more kids "on the spectrum" than should be. Be true autism is way higher than 30 years ago.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:07 am to the808bass
quote:
Whew. We dodged a bullet there.
Whew... just a 768% increase. It's good to know.. years AFTER we trusted the medical authorities that our children only had a seven fold increase risk of autism.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:08 am to lake chuck fan
You’re right on. The biggest driver of the “rise” in autism is how the diagnosis itself has changed over time. In the 80's and 90's the criteria broadened, awareness grew, and clinicians started recognizing kids who would’ve once been labeled with something else. That’s why you see the graphs climbing. it’s not a sudden epidemic, it’s the medical community spotting and naming it. Vaccines aren’t part of that story, no matter how often people try to tie them in.
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 10:08 am
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:09 am to Placekicker
RFK was easily the best cabinet pick
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You know better to rely on only an abstract and spike the football because retards online can't even read that properly.
That's a direct quote from the source YOU LINKED!
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:10 am to Louisianalabguy
quote:
Whew... just a 768% increase. It's good to know.. years AFTER we trusted the medical authorities that our children only had a seven fold increase risk of autism.
What is this recurring theme where y'all ignore the total post?
It's almost as if you're seeking out things to confirm your preconceived worldview crafted by charlatans
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:11 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
That's a direct quote from the source YOU LINKED!
Yes, and if you keep reading, you'll learn why that's still not a worthy conclusion.
Abstract =/= Studies
Actual studies found no such increase.
Also a direct quote from my post:
quote:
It is, in fact, impossible to tell from this abstract alone what explains the results. There just isn’t enough information in the abstract. The way science works is that after an abstract, authors will move on to produce a paper in which they usually provide more details, do more careful analysis, and often add more data. The abstract is a first step of the research process.
These researchers did that. In 2003, they published a more complete paper in the journal Pediatrics, which showed no link between autism and thimerosal exposure. Review data based on multiple papers shows a similar result.
Why'd you stop reading?
This post was edited on 9/1/25 at 10:12 am
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:11 am to Placekicker
RFK is anti vaccine and clearly full of shite. Also woefully under qualified to tell us if vaccines were bad anyways.
Anyone who believes he will produce better health outcomes should come look at my ocean front property in Arizona. It's really nice this time of year.
Anyone who believes he will produce better health outcomes should come look at my ocean front property in Arizona. It's really nice this time of year.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:12 am to oklahogjr
Why would a newborn need an STD vaccine?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:13 am to Padme
quote:
Why would a newborn need an STD vaccine?
Can HepB only be transmitted via sexual contact?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Perhaps most importantly, people who have more vaccines early on tend to have more well-child visits, and those well-child visits are also where other diagnoses (such as autism) are often made.
The CDC says only about 1% of children are NOT fully vaccinated at 2 years old (though I have to wonder if that's only counting legal citizens). The quoted sentence above is meaningless.Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:15 am to SlowFlowPro
You didn’t answer my question
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:15 am to Padme
Because sex is not the only way to get hep B...
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:16 am to Padme
quote:
You didn’t answer my question
I'm showing why it's a bad question.
When did you stop beating your wife?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
These researchers did that. In 2003, they published a more complete paper in the journal Pediatrics, which showed no link between autism and thimerosal exposure. Review data based on multiple papers shows a similar result.
Why'd you stop reading?
This is one of the "zombie ideas" (like the Wakefield study, which is the best example) that shamble on despite being a rotting corpse. RFK knows these don't work, so he's using his trying to create some new "official" versions and is supposed to reveal the true cause of autism later this month (guess what it will be?
). Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
Is beating my wife the only way I can get some pussie?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:18 am to TigerDoc
quote:
You’re right on. The biggest driver of the “rise” in autism is how the diagnosis itself has changed over time. In the 80's and 90's the criteria broadened, awareness grew, and clinicians started recognizing kids who would’ve once been labeled with something else. That’s why you see the graphs climbing. it’s not a sudden epidemic, it’s the medical community spotting and naming it. Vaccines aren’t part of that story, no matter how often people try to tie them in.
Thx. I guess I owe my son an apology! Lol
He's in his residency to be a doctor and explained this to me.
I wasn't sure how accurate he was....
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why'd you stop reading?
Why did you stop thinking?
Posted on 9/1/25 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's almost as if you're seeking out things to confirm your preconceived worldview crafted by charlatans
The first question any parent should ask themselves is " Is any of this naturally occurring in a one month old?" Then ask " Is my infant deficient in this?"
Then find the answers to injecting synthetic molecules into infants that weigh less than 12 pounds and have only mothers milk (colostrum) to provide immunity.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News