Started By
Message
locked post

CDC advising not to take dangerous J&J vaccine they approved, said was safe and effective

Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:23 am
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53729 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:23 am
Uhoh vax bros........

What happened Vax bros?

quote:

CDC Panel Abruptly Shifts Stance on J&J Coronavirus Vaccine, Recommends Pfizer, Moderna Shots Instead




LINK

At this point the stripper whispering in your ear at Larry Flynt's is more credible.


quote:

Earlier this year the CDC recommended a 10-day pause on the use of the J&J vaccine "out of an abundance of caution" when six women developed the condition after the single-dose shot. When it lifted the pause, the agency said it had “confidence that this vaccine is safe and effective in preventing COVID-19."


It's not safe or effective, fricking unreal.
This post was edited on 12/17/21 at 7:26 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85108 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:26 am to
All about the money….

I’d take JJ over the others… least effective, less myocarditis, only 1 shot.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28170 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:26 am to
CDC needs to be banned from social media for fearmongering and spreading misinformation.

We all know every shot is safe. Safe just like the 2020 election.
Posted by Privateer 2007
Member since Jan 2020
7951 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:27 am to
quote:

not safe or effective


Yep. And can't exactly reverse taking it.
For those who did, it's done. Damage is done.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:29 am to
As Meatloaf sang years ago, Two out of Three Ain't bad.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
40155 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:34 am to
quote:

I’d take JJ over the others… least effective, less myocarditis, only 1 shot.


but J&J is the one causing blood clots.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85108 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:42 am to
quote:

but J&J is the one causing blood clots.


As I’ve read, the clots are less common than the myocarditis?

Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17490 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 7:59 am to
Wait??? Sooo.. the CDC is tin foil hat wearing science deniers????

I can’t imagine being a prog reading that from the CDC. Their marching orders required them to call anyone questioning the vaccines names and exclude them from any conversation (ban and delete)

But now.. uh oh.. their marching orders now conflict.

It’s no wonder their brains can’t function. They have to flip flop on everything at lightening speed and defend things they previously ridiculed. That’s why they sound so stupid.

If only they would just try to think and rationalize. Not take spoon fed thoughts. If only.

Oh well.. remember to open your trunks today progs.
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
5071 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:00 am to
I would be willing to bet that J&J did not want to play patty cake with this admin on kickbacks as much as the other two. It has been reported that the US Govt has large stake in both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.. Also Pfizer is most widely held stock by Congress.
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8296 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:04 am to

quote:

but J&J is the one causing blood clots.



Take a daily aspirin, Baw.
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
13269 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:10 am to
so, they want people to take the even more questionable mRNA shots....

This is about getting rid of the control group of non-mRNA people before the long term effects become obvious.

Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
13269 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:13 am to





CDC, EPA, Team Fauci
Posted by TigerCat33
Member since Apr 2015
1345 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:14 am to
Sweet.

I’m sure the 17,311,789 people that have taken the J&J jab feel great about this. Especially since the federal government has granted immunity from liability. They also granted the food and drug administration the same immunity.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70335 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:14 am to
quote:

All about the money….


And the mRna has something in it they desperately want every single human to have injected into them
Posted by TxRan2020
Texas
Member since May 2020
721 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:14 am to
Exactly. Or else it’s J&J’s “turn” to bribe the CDC to flip flop the “science” back into their favor.
Posted by TNTigerman
James Island
Member since Sep 2012
12090 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:24 am to
The more reason to take the J&J if you're considering.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11821 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:26 am to
quote:

effective in preventing COVID-19


Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11821 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:28 am to
quote:

I would be willing to bet that J&J did not want to play patty cake with this admin on kickbacks as much as the other two. It has been reported that the US Govt has large stake in both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.. Also Pfizer is most widely held stock by Congress.



J&J must not have any available board seats for government employees.
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:35 am to
They have a quota to meet for Pfizer/Modena.

When they release the details in 2055, this will be known.
Posted by Von
Wichita Falls, TX
Member since Feb 2019
2667 posts
Posted on 12/17/21 at 8:55 am to
Sounds like they want to concentrate diminishing sales to the more profitable shots.

I remember getting strikes on FB last year for sharing links to patent filings showing some CDC employees owned patents to some of the ingredients in the other two shots.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram