- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:34 pm to 3down10
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:34 pm to 3down10
quote:
What evidence do you have that she's making more now? Y
I never made that argument. You used the DW as evidence, not me. It's your point to defend.
quote:
You are the one who is making the accusations that it's money based
Well yeah. She used it as part of her money-making online platform.
If it wasn't money-based, she could have done it elsewhere for free and demonetized all her content on it. Did she?
quote:
. I think she's charged by searching for the truth, something you apparently have trouble understanding.
I understand actually looking for truth
I also understand grifting
Again, I called her out as a grifter years ago, before she was "searching for the truth", as you put it.
quote:
First, Charlie wouldn't at all want to shut her up. In fact, he would want the opposite. That's what Charlie was actually about, open discussion and debate.
And part of that is calling her a grifter and people who believe her stupid/insane.
You're the one trying to prevent rational criticism and engaging in dishonesty doing so.
The only people trying to minimize or stop conversations are you and your ilk. The rest are laughing at you
quote:
Second, if you can't count on your friends to ask questions about your murder, who can you count on?
We know what happened to CK
quote:
Third, she can get clicks talking about anything.
And she chooses things rational people correctly criticize her (and he audience) for choosing.
quote:
Spoiler: It's a dude.
Where are your objective, verified facts to back this up?
quote:
The only people who hate people asking questions are people who don't want their actions questioned.
This is an example of the dishonesty referenced above.
Nobody "hates" her doing this. We are LAUGHING AT YOU.
1
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:34 pm to Hognutz
Not anything close to specific evidence or evidence relating to the shooting, really.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:34 pm to 3down10
quote:
Except each floor did not add to the weight. Extreme amounts of each floors exploded out up to 600 feet away from the building.
A building pancaking, the air will be compressed and forced laterally at violent speeds. 
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:36 pm to the808bass
quote:
What do you think this means?
Skip to the part where Jews planted thermite in the building and also tricked some Ayrabs to running planes into them.
Here we go with the collectivism where it's impossible that Jewish people are individuals who act on their own.
It's funny how fricking brainwashed you are.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:38 pm to 3down10
quote:
Here we go with the collectivism where it's impossible that Jewish people are individuals who act on their own.
Do you think Israel had anything to do with 911?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:39 pm to 3down10
quote:
Third, she can get clicks talking about anything.
This demonstrably false.
She jumped from 48th in Q2 to 28th in Q3.
She’s riding the wave of Charlie’s death and loving it.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:40 pm to RogerTheShrubber
No no no. Gypsum would never be forced outwards. It’s incredibly resilient.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:42 pm to the808bass
quote:
No no no. Gypsum would never be forced outwards. It’s incredibly resilient.
I kinda thought this stuff was common knowledge, I guess not.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:45 pm to RogerTheShrubber
This is the same guy who said the exterior modular steel plates that transferred half the load of gravity from the interior structural columns were “cosmetic.”
Then he argued that it’s like a bowling ball going through glass.
He has no idea what he’s arguing. He thinks that everyone creates arguments on the fly because that’s what he has to do.
Then he argued that it’s like a bowling ball going through glass.
He has no idea what he’s arguing. He thinks that everyone creates arguments on the fly because that’s what he has to do.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
I didn't say it was but, are you saying this is meaningless?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:47 pm to Hognutz
quote:
I didn't say it was but, are you saying this is meaningless?
I said it was non-responsive to my question.
Which is going on an hour of not being answered (relevantly, at least).
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never made that argument. You used the DW as evidence, not me. It's your point to defend.
Well yeah. She used it as part of her money-making online platform.
If it wasn't money-based, she could have done it elsewhere for free and demonetized all her content on it. Did she?
You claimed she was doing it for money. I pointed out she didn't need to do it for money, she was already getting paid for content.
quote:
I understand actually looking for truth
I also understand grifting
Again, I called her out as a grifter years ago, before she was "searching for the truth", as you put it.
Jibber Jabber
quote:
And part of that is calling her a grifter and people who believe her stupid/insane.
You're the one trying to prevent rational criticism and engaging in dishonesty doing so.
The only people trying to minimize or stop conversations are you and your ilk. The rest are laughing at you
You have not addressed the things she's said or tried to disprove anything. All you and others have done is call her names and attack her.
quote:
We know what happened to CK
What's the harm in people investigating?
quote:
And she chooses things rational people correctly criticize her (and he audience) for choosing.
In your opinion. But again, you only attack her not her claims.
quote:
Where are your objective, verified facts to back this up?
Look it up yourself.
quote:
This is an example of the dishonesty referenced above.
Nobody "hates" her doing this. We are LAUGHING AT YOU.
No, that's the image you want to project. You're going to find that kind of stuff doesn't work on me because I don't give a frick what your opinion of me is.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:51 pm to Morgus
No doubt she’ll milk anything she thinks she has to any low information clowns that will give her platform traffic.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
Searches about Robinson originating in Israel prior to Charlie's murder aren't a connection huh... And D.C., and not just him, the hospital, doctors and more....yeah, ok.
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:54 pm to Snipe
quote:
No doubt she’ll milk anything she thinks she has to any low information clowns that will give her platform traffic
Sounds like she has triggered you. I don’t really believe one way or another about this, but the grown men that stay so pressed about what this woman says is hilarious. I’ll also say the full court press of Jew propaganda has been fun to watch lately too
Posted on 10/25/25 at 7:55 pm to Snipe
quote:
Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.
Yeah, but she's my kind of kra-zay.
BOOM MAGA MAGA MAGA BOOM!
Posted on 10/25/25 at 8:12 pm to the808bass
quote:
This demonstrably false.
She jumped from 48th in Q2 to 28th in Q3.
She’s riding the wave of Charlie’s death and loving it.
I don't know what 48th to 28th is ranking exactly or what is significant about it.
Do you have a long term trend, or something other than of 2 numeric ranking data points?
Not that I think it means anything to be honest.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 8:18 pm to 3down10
quote:
Not that I think it means anything to be honest.
She's not doing this for money
Data showing she's doing it for money turns me into Caveman Lawyer and I conclude it doesn't mean anything
Posted on 10/25/25 at 8:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
She's not doing this for money
Data showing she's doing it for money turns me into Caveman Lawyer and I conclude it doesn't mean anything
The data could only possibly show she is making more money compared to the previous quarter. It does not show her motivation.
Who in your opinion is allowed to talk about Charlie Kirk?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 8:25 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Anyone who thinks that kid did it alone, is an absolute lunatic moron.
Page 16 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News