- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:04 am to kingbob
quote:
Actually, this is a lie. The industrial zone largely gets their water from the river.
thats total bullshite.
here's a map of ALL wells in BR.
MOST are for industry. Why are you a fricking liar?
That image is from the Water Resources Group at LSU....who the frick are you citing?
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:07 am to Bison
quote:
I know someone will turn this into a political issue
You posted on the PB, dumb frick
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:08 am to CptBengal
Because the wells for industry are used for brine and storage. They get their potable water from the river. That's why the water at Exxon tastes like shiite.
This post was edited on 11/15/17 at 10:08 am
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:09 am to kingbob
quote:
Because the wells for industry are used for brine and storage. They get their potable water from the river. That's why the water at Exxon tastes like shiite.
so you actually think industry uses more potable than i-water?
so you're not just a liar, you're stupid too.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:10 am to CptBengal
Wells for Brine and storage are not tapping into the same aquifers as the BR Water Co's wells.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:12 am to GumboPot
quote:
Water from water wells are A LOT cheaper than building water treatment plants to treat surface water from the Mississippi River.
This is the core issue.
I've seen some people at plants close to the river that bitch about their discharge into the MS saying that they have to put it back in cleaner than it was when they took it out. There are some other issues concerning river levels and river navigation, but treatment cost is the biggest issue.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:14 am to kingbob
quote:
Wells for Brine and storage are not tapping into the same aquifers as the BR Water Co's wells.
:sigh:
should i show you another one of the graphs from water resources at LSU?
seriously. stop repeating what you heard from your coworker.
here ya go d-bag.
Not the same...right?
I mean we can go well by well too. I actually have all that data. some industrial on the same sand layer as some drinking. Come on, tell me what else your coworker said...
Posted on 11/15/17 at 10:16 am to CptBengal
quote:
CptBengal
Dude, you need to get laid. You're the angriest person on earth. I'll get you a hooker.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 11:04 am to CptBengal
quote:
heard from your coworker.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 11:05 am to Bison
Once the benzene contamination under Exxon infiltrates the aquifer it really won't matter.
Posted on 11/15/17 at 11:14 am to Bison
I'm absolutely ready to protect the acquifer.
Not on the basis of a likely biased article though.
- any evidence to support the assertion that it's the companies draining the acquifer?
- do we have a scientific report on the salinization increases in drinking water? How far reaching is this problem?
- what is the draw rate for the city itself? What is the draw rate from local agriculture? Agriculture tends to use 1000% more water than anything else.
With actual facts, we can create solutions. I'm absolutely not sure that draining water from the Mississippi is a solution. How would that effect discharge rates of water or mud? How would it effect local fisheries?
Not on the basis of a likely biased article though.
- any evidence to support the assertion that it's the companies draining the acquifer?
- do we have a scientific report on the salinization increases in drinking water? How far reaching is this problem?
- what is the draw rate for the city itself? What is the draw rate from local agriculture? Agriculture tends to use 1000% more water than anything else.
With actual facts, we can create solutions. I'm absolutely not sure that draining water from the Mississippi is a solution. How would that effect discharge rates of water or mud? How would it effect local fisheries?
Posted on 11/15/17 at 2:16 pm to Bison
Baton Rouge had great tap water in comparison to any other place I have ever lived except my granddad’s well in Desoto Parish. Oil production ruined our well. Why does Exxon need good water? Why can’t they use river water?
Posted on 11/15/17 at 2:22 pm to Bison
That aquifer is not going to be depleted.
Stop with chicken little shite.
Stop with chicken little shite.
Popular
Back to top

0






